General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs the rasmussend reports reliable?
If so we need to stop fighting with each other and start getting along
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/trump_41_clinton_39
Last week, Rasmussen Reports gave voters the option of staying home on Election Day if Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are the big party nominees, and six percent (6%) said thats what they intend to do for now. Clinton and Trump were tied with 38% support each; 16% said they would vote for some other candidate, and two percent (2%) were undecided.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Amishman
(5,918 posts)Might as well read the RNC's numbers...
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Even as a Bernie supporter, I don't think the GE is this close yet. Not until Trump drops the "Woman Card" crap and starts dishing out the real issues.
MFM008
(20,042 posts)as president.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)were the two that had Romney winning in 2012 right up to election day. If that's who you want to hang your hat on, knock yourself out.
krawhitham
(5,061 posts)eissa
(4,238 posts)than Bush and Romney (which seems highly unlikely) then this poll is laughable.
edhopper
(37,180 posts)an outlier
compare it to other polls.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Hence, Repukes love it. They swore in 2012 that it was the only reliable poll (coincidentally, it was the only one that showed Romney winning). Rasmussen is a big reason the Republicans had such a meltdown when Obama won. They had all allowed themselves to be duped and conned into believing they were winning, in no small part because every Repuke pundit was quoting only Rasmussen and saying every other poll was oversampling Dems. In reality, it's the other way around. Rasmussen consistently oversamples Republicans.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Not the worst, not the best. Gallup only got a C+.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)No, they're not.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)They have consistently been the most accurate for awhile now, often calling elections within a point or two. When judging polling I go by two things: number one is either the average or general trends when looking at all polls. If 11 of them show one candidate winning and one shows another, it's usually safe to assume that the other eleven are probably more accurate. Number two is, check what Pew says. It's usually right.
