General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Boots on the Ground" in Iraq: Here We Go Again
Your Monday morning (PDT, anyway) Pitt-me-up.
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/35873-boots-on-the-ground-in-iraq-here-we-go-again
Here we are just about two years later, and US soldiers wearing boots are on the ground in Iraq and Syria. The Green Zone in Baghdad has been stormed. The latest US deployments are small, but floods always start with a drip. About 217 US soldiers have been sent to Iraq to augment the more than 4,000 troops already there, along with an additional 250 sent to the urban death zone that is Syria. They're going to a place where hospitals are deliberately destroyed; a medical facility in Aleppo was recently obliterated in an airstrike, killing 14 people. The US blamed the Syrian government, the Syrians and Russians blamed the US, and the dead lie still.
"We see a continual escalation with the now 250 additional troops," said Rep. Barbara Lee. "Whenever you have troops in harm's way, unintended consequences could occur. I'm very worried that our troops, while advisers, are still in the middle of the war and without authorization from Congress." Sen. John McCain, in a rare moment of sense, said, "We used to call it 'mission creep.' I've seen this movie before. It's called Vietnam."...
If Hillary Clinton wins in November, we're in the same boat without all the shouting. She is not as frightening as her presumed opponent, but her judgment on matters of war and personal freedom have been shown to be sorely lacking. Clinton voted with the Bush administration on the Iraq war (which gave us ISIS) and the Patriot Act. Her recent hawkish speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee convention would have made Barry Goldwater hide under the bed with a daisy pressed between his palms. Should she enter that round room after inauguration come January, you can bet your last dime that our 25-year adventure in Iraq will continue, and expand, unabated.
moonbabygo
(281 posts)he is not a war president, but sometimes scenarios change and .... well you read the post
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... the troops out.
We had over 150,000 in Iraq when he took office. We have about 4-5k there now.
We aren't "going" back.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)A new administration will have to do something fresh and bold.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And Eqypt, and Libya ... the same hair on fire nonsense.
Human101948
(3,457 posts)That's one of the big reasons Hillary lost to him.Thank God he didn't take Hillary's advice in most cases.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)There was no way for him to vote against it formally.
And the other thing I find funny in your post is that you think Obama never took the advice of Hillary while she was his SOS. She was in favor of the successful raid against OBL, Biden was not.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)They are soldiers, they are people.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)Boots indeed.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)we also do say boots on the ground on the operational side. You are correct though, it does soften the reality.
actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)And some have said: well we don't have as many there as we did before, so we aren't going back. I agree, WE aren't going anywhere. But some of our fellow citizens are.