Who will the bigger enthusiasm gap among their party: Hillary or Dumpf?

[pstokely]

I think it will be Dumpf

[Orrex]

1. The answer can be found in GDP

And the question should have been found there, too.

[moonbabygo]

2. I think so too

and I am shocked. There was a time not so long ago when I though Hillary would just slide in as the nominee and trump would phase out. I guess I wont be playing the lottery anytime soon

[Cobalt Violet]

3. Hillary will get it done!

[pampango]

4. That is the question. Another DU poster shed some light.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027802691

... if a liberal is going to sit in the oval office, let us not take part in putting them there with our names on their support roster. Let us not let a man for 4 years get up on that bully pulpit and create a mistrust of conservatism that destroys the meager gains we've managed.

... Hillary would be more likely to face gridlock on liberal policies than Mr. Trump would.

The party is already destroyed simply by his nomination. #NeverTrump intends to at least salvage conservatism.

If you substitute 'Clinton' for 'Trump' and exchange 'liberal' and 'conservative', it would look like this:

... if a conservative is going to sit in the oval office, let us not take part in putting them there with our names on their support roster. Let us not let a woman for 4 years get up on that bully pulpit and create a mistrust of liberalism that destroys the meager gains we've managed.

... Donald would be more likely to face gridlock on conservative policies than Ms. Clinton would.

The party is already destroyed simply by his nomination. #NeverClinton intends to at least salvage liberalism.

It's hard to imagine anyone facing more 'gridlock' than Obama has or another Democrat will but that has an oddly familiar ring to it.

[pnwmom]

5. 70% of Repub women hate Trump. nt

[MisterP]

6. DWS lost 11 Governors, 13 Senators, 69 Reps, 913 state seats: a WH isn't too steep an order at all