Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEU upholds tough rules on tobacco packaging
Rules that will drastically alter cigarette packaging are set to be adopted, after big tobacco firms failed to block new European Union laws.
Europe's highest court upheld a law that will standardise packaging and ban the advertising of e-cigarettes.
The Court of Justice found the laws "did not go beyond the limits of what is appropriate and necessary".
Under the new rules health warnings will have to cover 65% of the front and back of cigarette packaging.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36200778
Europe's highest court upheld a law that will standardise packaging and ban the advertising of e-cigarettes.
The Court of Justice found the laws "did not go beyond the limits of what is appropriate and necessary".
Under the new rules health warnings will have to cover 65% of the front and back of cigarette packaging.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36200778
It's rulings like this that could be threatened by TTIP:
Investment Dispute Settlement It is worrying that this does not appear to include appropriate safeguards for the right to regulate for public health in the proposal and interestingly, there is no general exception of tobacco control measures ( tobacco carve out). EPHA is calling for a public health carve out instead of a tobacco carve out. Greenpeace link - http://ttip-leaks.org/serpedon/doc15.pdf
http://www.epha.org/a/6513
http://www.epha.org/a/6513
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 406 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EU upholds tough rules on tobacco packaging (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
OP
It's not easy to tell what effect new packaging rules will have from 2012 figures
muriel_volestrangler
May 2016
#2
Recursion
(56,582 posts)1. They don't seem to be helping much
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.PRV.SMOK.MA?order=wbapi_data_value_2012+wbapi_data_value+wbapi_data_value-first&sort=asc
The US has some of the most innoccous warnings and one of the lowest smoking rates in the OECD.
The US has some of the most innoccous warnings and one of the lowest smoking rates in the OECD.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,312 posts)2. It's not easy to tell what effect new packaging rules will have from 2012 figures
But since the toughest packaging rules are in Australia, that may be worth looking at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_tobacco_packaging
In 1973, Australia's first health warning on cigarette packages appeared with the simple message 'WarningSmoking is a health hazard'.[3] Since 1 March 2006, graphic images depicting the effects of smoking cigarettes have been required to be displayed on cigarette packets. Warnings must cover 30% of the front and 90% of the back of the box.[4] The 10% of the back not occupied by a warning is used for the message "Sale to underage persons prohibited".
Since 1 December 2012 all forms of branding logos, colours, and promotional texts are banned from cigarette pack designs. The requirement is for plain cigarette packaging showing only brand name and health warning messages. Australia is the first country in the world to have plain packaging cigarette packs.[5][6]
Canada was the first country to use graphic pictures in conjunction with written warnings on cigarette packages, with the legislation coming in 2000.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette_packets_in_Australia
Since 1 December 2012 all forms of branding logos, colours, and promotional texts are banned from cigarette pack designs. The requirement is for plain cigarette packaging showing only brand name and health warning messages. Australia is the first country in the world to have plain packaging cigarette packs.[5][6]
Canada was the first country to use graphic pictures in conjunction with written warnings on cigarette packages, with the legislation coming in 2000.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette_packets_in_Australia
We do have the figures for 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2012 from your source, so, looking at those 2 countries and the UK and USA:
Australia 27 23 20 18
Canada 29 25 21 20
UK 31 27 23 22
USA 28 25 22 21
So smoking is decreasing at a slightly faster rate (down 9% in 12 years, v. 7% for the USA) in the other sizeable English-speaking countries (relevant, since the cultures are fairly similar, and the tobacco companies are more likely to share brands and marketing across them). So there may be something to the packaging rules.