Voting, in the current context, is about HARM REDUCTION.

[KamaAina]

From an FB friend.

[stillwaiting]

1. Who does Kissinger support again?

I am not saying anything other than "Who does Kissinger support again?".

I am in a truly perplexed place right now.

[Kelvin Mace]

7. I had and HRC supporter flat out tell me that if Kissinger helped her win

that was cool with him.

[NightWatcher]

2. Makes you miss the days of Hope and Change

Woo me with grandiose promises, don't threaten me with an Or Else.

[amborin]

3. Hillary is the war candidate; we cannot have more of her misguided regime change

[KamaAina]

4. Oh, right. She's the one who wants to nuke ISIS.

[Fumesucker]

5. Iran, not ISIS...

I know it's hard to keep all this stuff straight but Hillary spoke of "obliterating" Iran.

[Kelvin Mace]

6. Harm is relevant

Sure it voting for the lesser of evils might protect some American lives, but what about all the other people who will die as a result of eternal warfare and new adventures in invasion?

[Maedhros]

8. I look at the long-term result.

We are continually brow-beaten into voting for increasingly less-liberal, less-progressive, more-corporate Democratic candidates because, we're assured, the Republicans are much worse.

Assuming we continue this strategy, where does that leave the Democratic Party in 2024? 2032? What kind of corporate hellscape will we have triangulated ourselves into?

[Kelvin Mace]

9. In my view, "It's the climate change, stupid!"

Trump or HRC will doom us. Trump will refuse to do anything, and will try to obstruct, or undo what we have done. HRC will simply drag her feet until all the damage is irreversible. Only Sanders will try and take immediate action.

So, that said, it's an easy choice for me.

[Jester Messiah]

10. There's none to be had between Trump/Hillary. n/t