Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:46 PM May 2016

Tribes prevail, kill proposed coal terminal at Cherry Point

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/environment/tribes-prevail-kill-proposed-coal-terminal-at-cherry-point/

The Lummi Nation has prevailed in its fight to block the largest coal port ever proposed in North America, at Cherry Point.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the agency reviewing permits for the deep water port project, agreed with the tribe Monday that it could not grant a permit for a project that would infringe on the Lummi Nation’s treaty-protected fishing rights.


The 34-page decision was celebrated by community groups and tribes all over the Northwest that opposed the coal port.

The developer, SSA Marine of Seattle, declared the decision “inconceivable” and political, rather than fact-based. Bob Watters, SSA senior vice president and director of business development, said the company was “considering all action alternatives.”


https://m.




Lummi hereditary chief Bill James, on the beach at Cherry Point, says saving it is to preserve “the tribe’s very way of life.” It’s the site of an ancient Lummi village. (Alan Berner/The Seattle Times)
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tribes prevail, kill proposed coal terminal at Cherry Point (Original Post) suffragette May 2016 OP
K&R... spanone May 2016 #1
Thank you! Very good news today! suffragette May 2016 #4
Hooray, Lummi Tribe! raging moderate May 2016 #2
Very glad for it! I added a picture to the OP. Think you'll like it. suffragette May 2016 #6
Wado, Lummi Nation! yellerpup May 2016 #3
Salish Sea tribes have been working cross border on environmental issues. suffragette May 2016 #12
Awesome job! yellerpup May 2016 #14
K N R-ed Faux pas May 2016 #5
Thank you! suffragette May 2016 #22
There are some market forces in play, too... Wounded Bear May 2016 #7
Excellent points. Also, traffic studies showed likely delays to emergency vehicles. suffragette May 2016 #8
Treaty rights infringed by environmental impact: Ghost Dog May 2016 #9
Extremely important principle. suffragette May 2016 #10
Way to go Lummi tribe! I love the Northwest! liberal_at_heart May 2016 #11
Through adversity to a win. suffragette May 2016 #23
because they think of the FUTURE. pansypoo53219 May 2016 #13
Yes! A better future for all! suffragette May 2016 #24
There's already an Oil Refinery there. maxsolomon May 2016 #15
Different times... Wounded Bear May 2016 #19
Great response, WB. I added some more info about struggles in 1970s below. suffragette May 2016 #21
They were busy trying to keep their culture and land suffragette May 2016 #20
K&R ReRe May 2016 #16
The photo really captures the place, people and moment. suffragette May 2016 #28
Great news , suffragette! okasha May 2016 #17
So true, okasha! suffragette May 2016 #25
Kick! (n/t) Mike__M May 2016 #18
Thanks! suffragette May 2016 #29
AWESOME! K&R Firebrand Gary May 2016 #26
Good. nt silvershadow May 2016 #27

yellerpup

(12,253 posts)
3. Wado, Lummi Nation!
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:51 PM
May 2016

You are both environmental protectors of your Nation and our mutual Nation. Thank you for voting to keep all our relations safe.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
12. Salish Sea tribes have been working cross border on environmental issues.
Tue May 10, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

They recognize we all share the world and share our responsibility to the future generations which will live here.

Wounded Bear

(58,648 posts)
7. There are some market forces in play, too...
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:10 PM
May 2016

Coal prices are falling faster then oil. Likely won't recover. Especially in China, which has pretty much ended its campaign to build coal fired plants. China was going to be the major customer, but all over the planet, countries are going in another direction. India is going green, as is much of SE Asia.

This terminal never had a lot of support in the non-tribal community either.

Good news though. The thought of multiple 100-car coal trains running through the Cascade Mountains and to the shores of the Salish Sea on a daily basis is very troubling.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
8. Excellent points. Also, traffic studies showed likely delays to emergency vehicles.
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:27 PM
May 2016
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/11/05/coal-trains-could-delay-downtown-sodo-traffic-by-one-to-three-hours-a-day-study-finds

The study found that some vehicle queued up for train crossings downtown and in SoDo could get 900-1,000 feet long as cars wouldn't have time to clear out entirely during train crossings between 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. This is especially dangerous for three Fire Stations—one under construction on 4th Avenue S, another on Alaskan Way, and a third on Fourth Avenue—whose emergency response times could be impacted by the delays.

"When we run trains through SoDO and [in Belltown], it impacts all modes—trains, cars, pedestrian, transit," McGinn said. "The public and policymakers need to take a close look at these findings as we examine the proposal to export more coal."

"The impacts on traffic, the impacts on employment, commuter traffic, they’re all negative for Seattle," added Seattle City Council member Mike O'Brien. "There is no benefit. This is about being a leader to building a sustainable system… if a project like this goes forward, our progress [to become carbon neutral by 2050] goes down the drain."



suffragette

(12,232 posts)
10. Extremely important principle.
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:40 PM
May 2016

The fight will continue, but this is an important victory.



‘Historic Victory for Treaty Rights’: Northwest Tribes Rejoice as Army Corps Rejects Coal Terminal

Gateway Pacific Terminal, proposed by SSA Marine subsidiary Pacific International Terminals, was planned to handle the export of up to 54 million dry metric tons per year of bulk commodities, mostly coal. BNSF Railway Inc. had proposed adding rail facilities adjacent to the terminal site.

The project was opposed by First Nations in the Pacific Northwest and Canada, particularly those who share the Salish Sea. The risk of coal and oil spills was too great, they said, and they contended that coal dust from the railway and terminal would affect the health of marine waters and nearby communities. They also contended that increased shipping would result in substantially increased ballast water discharges, which would introduce invasive species to the local marine environment.

~~~

“We are thrilled with today’s announcement by the United States Corps of Engineers that it is denying the Gateway Pacific Terminal permit at Cherry Point because of the impact it would have on treaty rights,” Quinault Nation President Fawn Sharp said in a statement. She is also president of the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians and vice president of the National Congress of American Indians.

“It is an appropriate and just decision,” she said. “But everyone who cares about fish and wildlife, the environment and human health should be happy with the Corps’ decision. This is an historic victory for tribal treaty rights as well as for everybody else who lives here. Those who understand the great value of our natural resources to our health and culture, as well as the sustainable economy of the entire region, will applaud today’s announcement.”


Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/05/10/historic-victory-treaty-rights-northwest-tribes-rejoice-army-corps-rejects-coal-terminal

Wounded Bear

(58,648 posts)
19. Different times...
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016


Awareness of these issues has been growing. Sadly, part of it is due to the casinos. Many tribes have more money now, which equates to more power. The more money and power is perhaps not a bad thing, but it's kind of sad they had to go that way to get enough political power to get noticed and listened to.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
20. They were busy trying to keep their culture and land
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:24 PM
May 2016
http://whatcomwatch.org/wpww/?p=348


1823 Johnson v. M’Intosh – first claim of discovery ruling
1832 Cherokee v. Georgia – ruling that Indians are like wards to the guardian
1855 Point Elliot Treaty defines agreement between US government and Pacific northwest Tribes
1859 Point Elliot Treaty proclaimed law of the land
1872 President Grant shrinks Lummi reservation land by Executive Order
1883 Religious Crimes Code bans religious freedom for Native Americans (unless Christian)
1923 Circular 1665 – banned Native American ceremonial dancing
1950 Last termination era – residential schools, forced relocations, extermination of tribalism
1955 Tee-Hit-Ton termination era case – all Indians declared to have been conquered
1970 Lummi refuse $58,000 offer for San Juan Islands and mainland Lummi home areas
1974 Boldt decision – reestablishes Native American treaty claims
1978 American Indian Religious Freedom Act allows aboriginal ceremonies
1979 Lummi tribe closes commercial herring fishery for conservation purposes
1979 Supreme Court ruling on Boldt decision reaffirms rights to treaty fisheries
1988 Supreme Court strikes down American Indian Religious Freedom Act
2011 Pacific International Terminals illegally bulldozes and drills on GPT land

In the case of the territory of the Lummi Indians, the United States offered to pay $58,000 in the early 1970s for the San Juan Islands and mainland homeland areas in Whatcom County. When the Lummi refused this offer the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), as the tribe’s “guardian,” accepted the money on behalf of the tribe (their “wards”) and placed it in the U.S. Treasury. The BIA argued with the Lummi, saying the tribe could use this money to build a school, a hospital, or homes for their people. The Lummi response was to order the BIA off the reservation. After their unceremonious departure, the BIA made it clear that they would hold the money until the tribe “came to its senses.”

At the time of this “offer” the United States was still in the fever of the Termination era, conveniently terminating treaty duties and responsibilities owed to the tribes. During this most recent cycle of termination, which began in the early 1950s, the United States (through overt actions as well as subterfuge) sought to disband all tribes and exterminate tribalism. The BIA was busy relocating the individual Indians as well as whole families into major metropolitan areas to break apart their kinship ties and separate them from their collective tradition of tribalism.9 Adding insult to injury, the BIA was shamelessly paternalistic and accepted offers by non-Indians to buy Lummi land. The ultimate goal of the BIA, an agent and agency of the United States, was to make our exile permanent. Though they are the Bureau of Indian Affairs, their allegiance is first and foremost to the federal government, not the tribes. In other words, the United States attempted to pay itself to gain control of our lands. This action was as corrupt and unconscionable as the perverse application of the Discovery Doctrine in the M’Intosh decision and the twisted principle of wardship in the Cherokee ruling.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
17. Great news , suffragette!
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:47 PM
May 2016

Wado! It would improve Native Americans' lives across the board if the federal government would just honor the treaties.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tribes prevail, kill prop...