General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTribes prevail, kill proposed coal terminal at Cherry Point
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/environment/tribes-prevail-kill-proposed-coal-terminal-at-cherry-point/The Lummi Nation has prevailed in its fight to block the largest coal port ever proposed in North America, at Cherry Point.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the agency reviewing permits for the deep water port project, agreed with the tribe Monday that it could not grant a permit for a project that would infringe on the Lummi Nations treaty-protected fishing rights.
The 34-page decision was celebrated by community groups and tribes all over the Northwest that opposed the coal port.
The developer, SSA Marine of Seattle, declared the decision inconceivable and political, rather than fact-based. Bob Watters, SSA senior vice president and director of business development, said the company was considering all action alternatives.
https://m.
Lummi hereditary chief Bill James, on the beach at Cherry Point, says saving it is to preserve the tribes very way of life. Its the site of an ancient Lummi village. (Alan Berner/The Seattle Times)
spanone
(135,830 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)raging moderate
(4,304 posts)And Army Corps of Engineers!
suffragette
(12,232 posts)yellerpup
(12,253 posts)You are both environmental protectors of your Nation and our mutual Nation. Thank you for voting to keep all our relations safe.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)They recognize we all share the world and share our responsibility to the future generations which will live here.
yellerpup
(12,253 posts)This is what democracy looks like, people coming together.
Faux pas
(14,672 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)Coal prices are falling faster then oil. Likely won't recover. Especially in China, which has pretty much ended its campaign to build coal fired plants. China was going to be the major customer, but all over the planet, countries are going in another direction. India is going green, as is much of SE Asia.
This terminal never had a lot of support in the non-tribal community either.
Good news though. The thought of multiple 100-car coal trains running through the Cascade Mountains and to the shores of the Salish Sea on a daily basis is very troubling.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)The study found that some vehicle queued up for train crossings downtown and in SoDo could get 900-1,000 feet long as cars wouldn't have time to clear out entirely during train crossings between 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. This is especially dangerous for three Fire Stationsone under construction on 4th Avenue S, another on Alaskan Way, and a third on Fourth Avenuewhose emergency response times could be impacted by the delays.
"When we run trains through SoDO and [in Belltown], it impacts all modestrains, cars, pedestrian, transit," McGinn said. "The public and policymakers need to take a close look at these findings as we examine the proposal to export more coal."
"The impacts on traffic, the impacts on employment, commuter traffic, theyre all negative for Seattle," added Seattle City Council member Mike O'Brien. "There is no benefit. This is about being a leader to building a sustainable system if a project like this goes forward, our progress [to become carbon neutral by 2050] goes down the drain."
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)An important principle.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)The fight will continue, but this is an important victory.
Historic Victory for Treaty Rights: Northwest Tribes Rejoice as Army Corps Rejects Coal Terminal
Gateway Pacific Terminal, proposed by SSA Marine subsidiary Pacific International Terminals, was planned to handle the export of up to 54 million dry metric tons per year of bulk commodities, mostly coal. BNSF Railway Inc. had proposed adding rail facilities adjacent to the terminal site.
The project was opposed by First Nations in the Pacific Northwest and Canada, particularly those who share the Salish Sea. The risk of coal and oil spills was too great, they said, and they contended that coal dust from the railway and terminal would affect the health of marine waters and nearby communities. They also contended that increased shipping would result in substantially increased ballast water discharges, which would introduce invasive species to the local marine environment.
~~~
We are thrilled with todays announcement by the United States Corps of Engineers that it is denying the Gateway Pacific Terminal permit at Cherry Point because of the impact it would have on treaty rights, Quinault Nation President Fawn Sharp said in a statement. She is also president of the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians and vice president of the National Congress of American Indians.
It is an appropriate and just decision, she said. But everyone who cares about fish and wildlife, the environment and human health should be happy with the Corps decision. This is an historic victory for tribal treaty rights as well as for everybody else who lives here. Those who understand the great value of our natural resources to our health and culture, as well as the sustainable economy of the entire region, will applaud todays announcement.
Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/05/10/historic-victory-treaty-rights-northwest-tribes-rejoice-army-corps-rejects-coal-terminal
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)They've worked so hard for this, for us all!
pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)maxsolomon
(33,327 posts)How did that one sneak past the tribe?
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)Awareness of these issues has been growing. Sadly, part of it is due to the casinos. Many tribes have more money now, which equates to more power. The more money and power is perhaps not a bad thing, but it's kind of sad they had to go that way to get enough political power to get noticed and listened to.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)1823 Johnson v. MIntosh first claim of discovery ruling
1832 Cherokee v. Georgia ruling that Indians are like wards to the guardian
1855 Point Elliot Treaty defines agreement between US government and Pacific northwest Tribes
1859 Point Elliot Treaty proclaimed law of the land
1872 President Grant shrinks Lummi reservation land by Executive Order
1883 Religious Crimes Code bans religious freedom for Native Americans (unless Christian)
1923 Circular 1665 banned Native American ceremonial dancing
1950 Last termination era residential schools, forced relocations, extermination of tribalism
1955 Tee-Hit-Ton termination era case all Indians declared to have been conquered
1970 Lummi refuse $58,000 offer for San Juan Islands and mainland Lummi home areas
1974 Boldt decision reestablishes Native American treaty claims
1978 American Indian Religious Freedom Act allows aboriginal ceremonies
1979 Lummi tribe closes commercial herring fishery for conservation purposes
1979 Supreme Court ruling on Boldt decision reaffirms rights to treaty fisheries
1988 Supreme Court strikes down American Indian Religious Freedom Act
2011 Pacific International Terminals illegally bulldozes and drills on GPT land
In the case of the territory of the Lummi Indians, the United States offered to pay $58,000 in the early 1970s for the San Juan Islands and mainland homeland areas in Whatcom County. When the Lummi refused this offer the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), as the tribes guardian, accepted the money on behalf of the tribe (their wards) and placed it in the U.S. Treasury. The BIA argued with the Lummi, saying the tribe could use this money to build a school, a hospital, or homes for their people. The Lummi response was to order the BIA off the reservation. After their unceremonious departure, the BIA made it clear that they would hold the money until the tribe came to its senses.
At the time of this offer the United States was still in the fever of the Termination era, conveniently terminating treaty duties and responsibilities owed to the tribes. During this most recent cycle of termination, which began in the early 1950s, the United States (through overt actions as well as subterfuge) sought to disband all tribes and exterminate tribalism. The BIA was busy relocating the individual Indians as well as whole families into major metropolitan areas to break apart their kinship ties and separate them from their collective tradition of tribalism.9 Adding insult to injury, the BIA was shamelessly paternalistic and accepted offers by non-Indians to buy Lummi land. The ultimate goal of the BIA, an agent and agency of the United States, was to make our exile permanent. Though they are the Bureau of Indian Affairs, their allegiance is first and foremost to the federal government, not the tribes. In other words, the United States attempted to pay itself to gain control of our lands. This action was as corrupt and unconscionable as the perverse application of the Discovery Doctrine in the MIntosh decision and the twisted principle of wardship in the Cherokee ruling.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)I am humbled. Great photo of the chief at the end of the day.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Wado! It would improve Native Americans' lives across the board if the federal government would just honor the treaties.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)It's been a long, hard fight to make them honor the treaties.