Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CanonRay

(14,084 posts)
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:48 AM May 2016

I just noticed an interesting thing about my ignore list

I have a (I think) fairly short one, only 20 individuals. In looking at their profiles, nearly every single one had a 0% chance of being on a jury. A few of them were under 40%, but not one over that figure. That kind of surprised me. What does that say? Some pretty snarky people, whom I am glad not to converse with.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. Odd how you would only want to talk with people that are in total agreement with you.
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:53 AM
May 2016

Keeping an open mind and being able to hold a dialogue, even with those 100% opposite will make a person more able to understand where the other person is coming from. With that knowledge you can begin an attempt to sway them.

Go ahead and block me too.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
3. That's an odd take. You do know people get posts hidden mostly not fit disagreeing but for being
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:00 AM
May 2016

disagreeable.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
4. I went some fourteen years without putting anyone on ignore.
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:08 AM
May 2016

I have all of six on my Ignore list, and I just did a quick check. Interestingly enough five of the six have their accounts flagged for review, haven't posted in at least a month. One is still active.

And I put those specific members on Ignore only after multiple run-ins with them. Each and every one was rude and obnoxious and DU is better off without them. Certainly my experience here is better off without them.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
8. We all do. It's called "The Internet".
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:16 AM
May 2016

This is a safe haven from that logical fallacy-laden, made-up "fact" manure pit.

To some extent.

Javaman

(62,503 posts)
10. that's one perspective.
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:18 AM
May 2016

the other is, there are people who enjoy hi-jacking threads, employ copious amounts of hyperbole and using a thread as a personal screed that does nothing to help anyone.

so they are blocked and what happens then is: an actual discussion emerges from once there wasn't one.

 

HOPNOSH

(37 posts)
11. Your post is a laugh riot
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:18 AM
May 2016

Extolling the virtues of keeping an open mind and closing with "block me too."

CanonRay

(14,084 posts)
14. You can completely disagree with me and not be a total asshole
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:36 AM
May 2016

which these people were, or I wouldn't have blocked them.

MissB

(15,803 posts)
13. Did you say something?
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:36 AM
May 2016

Kidding.

I only have six folks on ignore. They've shown themselves to be disagreeable sorts- the type that argue without realizing that we are on the same side. When they get that belligerent I figure there is nothing that they say that I would want to hear.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
7. Out of the five I had on my list (for good reasons, they were all economic Republicans) . . .
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:14 AM
May 2016

. . . three have been taken for granite.

. . . one no longer posts.

. . . one is still here, still being a "big tent"er.



Response to HughBeaumont (Reply #7)

Maeve

(42,271 posts)
12. I stopped putting people on ignore when I realized
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:19 AM
May 2016

most of them either left on their own accord or were tombstoned soon thereafter. Jerks eventually make themselves unwelcome.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
18. In my case, it's making it very hard to follow threads.
Thu May 12, 2016, 11:46 AM
May 2016

Okay, they're mostly GD: P threads, and n-Trashing that forum was the worst mistake I've ever made here at DU. But my currently 225-or-so-strong list - up from all of five, pre-2016-primaries - has left me with some popular threads (50+replies) in which I can see maybe a half-dozen.



There's always infighting during primaries...but I'm convinced neither this site nor the Democratic Party will ever be the same after this one.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I just noticed an interes...