Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,301 posts)
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:42 PM May 2016

Now the Benghazi nutcases are fighting...

I hope they destroy one another.

The Benghazi Feud: Who Gets 'Credit' For Failed 'Investigation'

Submitted by Ari Rabin-Havt on Thursday, 5/12/2016 5:42 pm

As Rep. Trey Gowdy’s Benghazi Select Committee continues to run up the tab (currently $6.7 million) of the eighth congressional investigation into the September 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, it has a new and surprising target for its ire. The Benghazi Select Committee has begun to feud with Judicial Watch, which has attempted to turn the tragedy in Benghazi into its own public relations and fundraising extravaganza. Judicial Watch, which has attempted to turn the tragedy in Benghazi into its own public relations and fundraising extravaganza and the Benghazi Select Committee have begun to feud over who gets the credit.

The National Review reports:

Republican Committee spokesmen are accusing Judicial Watch, the conservative watchdog group pursuing a parallel inquiry into the Benghazi attacks, of drafting in the Committee’s investigative wake while claiming credit for some of its most important discoveries.

They say they held their tongues after Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch’s president and an erstwhile ally, accused them of “bungling” the investigation in a March interview with the Washington Post. But as the release of the final report nears, GOP lawmakers, led by committee chairman Trey Gowdy, are worried that the group will over-politicize their much-anticipated report. So they’ve opened fire, accusing Judicial Watch of mischaracterizing the facts in a rush to enhance its reputation and boost fundraising. Judicial Watch has a history of misleading the press and fomenting conspiracy theories that are tailor-made to spread through the conservative media, while the Benghazi Select Committee has a track record of producing embarrassing flubs and not much else. Each group has a reason to fight for credit. Gowdy will ultimately need to justify his committee’s multimillion-dollar price tag, while Judicial Watch needs to prove success in its Benghazi efforts to justify its own fundraising. Ironically, both of these groups are searching for adulation based on an investigation that has thus far produced only criticism and no meaningful results.

- See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/benghazi-feud-who-gets-credit-failed-investigation#sthash.geSfFo3m.dpuf

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now the Benghazi nutcases are fighting... (Original Post) Archae May 2016 OP
Hmmm, let's see... world wide wally May 2016 #1
Just can not make this crap up. Wellstone ruled May 2016 #2
Klayman and Judicial Watch parted ways and are now suing each other. Archae May 2016 #4
Wow,Klayman sounds like a real trip. Wellstone ruled May 2016 #5
More than you realize. Archae May 2016 #6
Like I said,he is sticking his beak into the Bunkerville Wellstone ruled May 2016 #7
Good malaise May 2016 #3

world wide wally

(21,739 posts)
1. Hmmm, let's see...
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:55 PM
May 2016

$6 million on this, plus $50 million plus on Bill Clinton. And still not one proven case against either one. Are you sure I have to pay taxes for this?

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
2. Just can not make this crap up.
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:57 PM
May 2016

Is Klayman going to be their lead Lawyer? Judicial Watch reminds me of Joe McCarty and Richard Nixon and their little buddy Roy Cohen. What can go wrong I ask.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
5. Wow,Klayman sounds like a real trip.
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:40 PM
May 2016

He has been Hanging around Vegas trying to get the Judge hearing the Bundy Cases fired. What a wacha adoodle.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
7. Like I said,he is sticking his beak into the Bunkerville
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:31 AM
May 2016

Case. Read some of his so called briefs,all I can say is wow. This is stuff of Cleon Skousen and his Religious interpretation of our constitution. I do remember now of this Guy coming up with some conspiracy crap about the Clinton's. Understand this Guy has some major ethics issues pending and he is not allowed to Represent anyone in a Federal Court.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Now the Benghazi nutcases...