Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:27 AM May 2016

Does this sound ominous? the Women's Enhanced Reflection Act

It's got your 1984 language down perfectly. Could these antedeluvian cretins be more paternalistic?


Gov. Jon Bel Edwards intends to sign the Women's Enhanced Reflection Act, making Louisiana the sixth state to make women wait three days after meeting with a doctor to have an abortion.

Opponents say its an unnecessary hurdle for an already-legal medical procedure. One woman, who has had multiple abortions, thinks it is a pause women need to consider alternatives to abortion.

<snip>
http://m.wdsu.com/news/lawmakers-pass-3day-wait-requirement-for-women-seeking-abortion/39505932

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does this sound ominous? the Women's Enhanced Reflection Act (Original Post) cali May 2016 OP
If you have a right to something, you shouldn't have to wait on it 3 days NightWatcher May 2016 #1
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #23
So says the conservative troll Red State Prisoner May 2016 #26
Equating a medical procedure with shopping for a doodad is ridiculous. nt cyberswede May 2016 #30
Really? SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #32
The rule about waiting to actually get a gun you've purchased COLGATE4 May 2016 #33
As I understand it.... Delver Rootnose May 2016 #38
False equivalency. Part of that 3 day wait for a gun is to check to see if you can legally buy a gun NightWatcher May 2016 #42
what flavour pizza do you like? niyad May 2016 #47
I will say what everyone is thinking awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #51
Except with gun scscholar May 2016 #54
It could be these waiting periods leftynyc May 2016 #2
+1 demmiblue May 2016 #4
That and forced ultrasounds cali May 2016 #5
That too leftynyc May 2016 #24
Perverted Potty Party Pisses me off lagomorph777 May 2016 #40
Good alliteration. libdem4life May 2016 #52
Well said! PatSeg May 2016 #22
Hear, hear! smirkymonkey May 2016 #34
Yea so they can have a test for VD. That's the ticket. classykaren May 2016 #41
Why don't they simply require a man to tell her what to do? Orrex May 2016 #3
So true. OldHippieChick May 2016 #7
What an ass A Little Weird May 2016 #6
I propose a 3-day-waiting-period before going to a toilet frequented by transgender people. DetlefK May 2016 #8
I knew this would be brought into it. If only reproductive rights were as much cali May 2016 #9
Jon Bel Edwards is a Democrat? WTF Snarkoleptic May 2016 #10
A few weeks ago someone here argued he should be the VP nominee rpannier May 2016 #12
I guess it's a buyer-beware thing and we cannot assume D means he's pro choice. Snarkoleptic May 2016 #16
Another abandon supporters to get votes from people who won't vote for him rpannier May 2016 #19
No relation Roy Rolling May 2016 #28
You call it a purity test, I call it having certain core principles, DLevine May 2016 #44
"...his stance on abortion has been consistent" Not so much. Snarkoleptic May 2016 #49
A pro-choice Democrat wouldn't get elected in Lousiana TexasBushwhacker May 2016 #25
This is the kind of erosion of Democratic Party principles we have been seeing for decades now. alarimer May 2016 #35
Agreed, it is maddening. nt DLevine May 2016 #45
I'm not sure why they think women are stupid and wouldn't have already reflected gollygee May 2016 #11
Shoving government where it doesn't belong fasttense May 2016 #13
Why is a Democratic Governor tomg May 2016 #14
Even i, a graduate of catholic schools with their "Consistent Life Ethic" teachings, who has... lostnfound May 2016 #15
In some states abortion is not widely available milestogo May 2016 #17
How about a waiting period for buying a gun? Betty May 2016 #18
Trust me on this. lapislzi May 2016 #20
Yep - you nailed it. cyberswede May 2016 #31
Enhanced Reflection? LOL! Nitram May 2016 #21
It's very Orwellian. alarimer May 2016 #36
It must be a chic word. You know, like "Enhanced Interrogation." malthaussen May 2016 #27
Exactly. 3catwoman3 May 2016 #55
"Women's Enhanced Reflection Act" sulphurdunn May 2016 #29
Just like the TPP classykaren May 2016 #43
And you thought you'd never get an ERA. See? You just had to wait. NT mahatmakanejeeves May 2016 #37
Yet everyone here cheered when this guy won davidn3600 May 2016 #39
Enforced delay is "enhanced reflection" like torture is "enhanced interrogation". nt bemildred May 2016 #46
of course it does. not to mention how damned insulting it is. women are too damned stupid, niyad May 2016 #48
Ref for exposure awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #50
Is there a 3 day waiting period for a vasectomy? libdem4life May 2016 #53
Targeting a specific group for restrictions that don't apply to all groups... blackspade May 2016 #56
The only enhancement locks May 2016 #57

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
1. If you have a right to something, you shouldn't have to wait on it 3 days
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:31 AM
May 2016

Of course this is a hurdle for women who have to travel away from home to see the doctor, hoping that a delay will make them unable to return.

Fucking swine

Response to NightWatcher (Reply #1)

Red State Prisoner

(138 posts)
26. So says the conservative troll
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:21 AM
May 2016

What an asinine comparison. I could have forgiven an apples to oranges argument. Apples to asparagus...yeah, that's just stupid.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
33. The rule about waiting to actually get a gun you've purchased
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:53 AM
May 2016

is designed to prevent its use of it based on a temporary emotion of the moment. Most women don't make up their minds to have an abortion on the spur of the moment.

Delver Rootnose

(250 posts)
38. As I understand it....
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:27 AM
May 2016

....is the three day waiting period for gun purchase is to allow time to do a background check to see if you are legally allowed to have the gun. I could be wrong though.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
42. False equivalency. Part of that 3 day wait for a gun is to check to see if you can legally buy a gun
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:46 AM
May 2016

Felons and violent people are not allowed to own firearms. There are no exceptions for women who wish to visit a doctor...

niyad

(113,302 posts)
47. what flavour pizza do you like?
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:39 PM
May 2016

if you do not see the difference between a medical procedure and a piece of weaponry, you have some serious problems.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
2. It could be these waiting periods
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:33 AM
May 2016

piss me off more than anything else. As if the decision to terminate a pregnancy isn't hard enough, these clowns are basically patting us on the head and saying "we don't think you've thought about this long enough little lady, you need to think about it some more". So freeking condescending. That doesn't even get into that so many women have to travel hundreds of miles TWICE (perhaps even having to pay for hotels and such). These kinds of bullshit laws are only to punish women for wanting control of our lives. Grrrrrrrrr

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
24. That too
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:14 AM
May 2016

They treat us like simpleminded children. And donnie has promised to put only forced birth judges on the court. That alone makes the comparison between dem and rep a very stark contrast.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
40. Perverted Potty Party Pisses me off
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:33 AM
May 2016

They spend all their time dreaming up ways to get inside women's vaginas and peer into bathroom stalls.

Goddamned perverts.

PatSeg

(47,427 posts)
22. Well said!
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:08 AM
May 2016

Maybe men should have a three day waiting period when they first decide to initiate a sexual encounter.

Orrex

(63,208 posts)
3. Why don't they simply require a man to tell her what to do?
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:44 AM
May 2016

She's just a woman, after all. She can't be trusted with decisions and whatnot.

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)
7. So true.
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:52 AM
May 2016

They should just say what they actually mean, and quit this weak attempt to hide their real motives.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
8. I propose a 3-day-waiting-period before going to a toilet frequented by transgender people.
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:56 AM
May 2016

3 days sounds like a reasonable amount of time to ponder whether you REALLY want to use a toilet where a transgender person could be in that other stall.

Maybe it's time to consider alternatives to public toilets? How about shitting behind a bush or tree? Or shitting your pants? Or holding it in until you find another toilet?

And what we definitely need is politicians meddling with your body. All they are asking for is that their opinion be more important than the opinion of people actually on the case. Is that really that much of a demand?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. I knew this would be brought into it. If only reproductive rights were as much
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:00 AM
May 2016

of a cause celebre. No one is proposing boycotting these states that abrogate women's constitutional rights.

Snarkoleptic

(5,997 posts)
10. Jon Bel Edwards is a Democrat? WTF
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:01 AM
May 2016

If this is not evidence of the need for a purge in the party, I don't know what is.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
12. A few weeks ago someone here argued he should be the VP nominee
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:19 AM
May 2016

I was certain we could do better and Edwards has proven me correct

Snarkoleptic

(5,997 posts)
16. I guess it's a buyer-beware thing and we cannot assume D means he's pro choice.
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:33 AM
May 2016

Although he was seemingly not anti-choice back in 2006 when he answered a questionnaire-
"Abortion is the freedom of choice, between the appropriate parties and their higher power."

http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/John_Bel_Edwards_Abortion.htm

I know that reddish state Dems must be a bit conservative to get elected, but the election is in the rear view and this flip-flop is flat-out pandering to the right.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
19. Another abandon supporters to get votes from people who won't vote for him
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:48 AM
May 2016

But... as I recall from reading somewhere he is related to the former LA Gov Edwin Edwards

Roy Rolling

(6,917 posts)
28. No relation
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:31 AM
May 2016

JBE is not related to Edwin Edwards. And his stance on abortion has been consistent. No, he does not pass the 100% purity test. He did expand Medicare, protect LGBT rights, and support a medical marijuana bill. Cut him some slack, I guess those critical of him would support his opponent David Vitter?

This is the real world, dreamers. Sometimes you have to take the good with the bad.

DLevine

(1,788 posts)
44. You call it a purity test, I call it having certain core principles,
Fri May 13, 2016, 11:05 AM
May 2016

principles that are non-negotiable. A woman's right to choose is one of mine.

Snarkoleptic

(5,997 posts)
49. "...his stance on abortion has been consistent" Not so much.
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:26 PM
May 2016

Although he was seemingly not anti-choice back in 2006 when he answered a questionnaire-
"Abortion is the freedom of choice, between the appropriate parties and their higher power."

http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/John_Bel_Edwards_Abortion.htm

TexasBushwhacker

(20,186 posts)
25. A pro-choice Democrat wouldn't get elected in Lousiana
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:17 AM
May 2016

It is largely evangelical Christians and Catholics. At least he expanded Medicaid and supports raising the minimum wage. He also wants to let all current business tax credits to expire, especially the ones for the O&G industry.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
35. This is the kind of erosion of Democratic Party principles we have been seeing for decades now.
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:16 AM
May 2016

I have no used for "Democrats" who compromise away our very rights. But we have to vote for them because they have a "D" after their names, don't you know?? Because electability or some bullshit.

Oh yes, I see it has already raised its ugly head in this very thread. But, fuck compromising on essential principles for illusory electoral gains.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
11. I'm not sure why they think women are stupid and wouldn't have already reflected
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:04 AM
May 2016

On this decision.

Oh wait, they just want to make it cost more. And then women will be further along in their pregnancies when they abort, and they'll complain about how long they waited, and make the safe forms of abortion for later pregnancies illegal too.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
13. Shoving government where it doesn't belong
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:20 AM
May 2016

If a woman's womb were a corporation, all women would have 2 votes. One for her and one for her womb.

lostnfound

(16,178 posts)
15. Even i, a graduate of catholic schools with their "Consistent Life Ethic" teachings, who has...
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:33 AM
May 2016

taken decades to come around to a pro choice position, find these waiting periods absolutely absurd, insulting, and unreasonably burdensome on people who can least afford it.

Enough stories of young poor women, too young for birth, and women with life threatening or nonviable pregnancies, being forced to go on an expensive odyssey, far from home or the support of their loved ones -- in some cases unable to care for their other children, in some cases already devastated by circumstances beyond their control -- have convinced me that government needs to stay out of this.

If the government wants to do something, it can fund contraceptives and it can provide far more support for new parents.

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
17. In some states abortion is not widely available
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:33 AM
May 2016

so the woman is already taking a day to travel. Add 3 days and she has to pay for a hotel also. Its just one more way of screwing poor women.

lapislzi

(5,762 posts)
20. Trust me on this.
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:50 AM
May 2016

If you're in the clinic to have an abortion, I assure you that you've thought about it for AT LEAST three days. Three fucking days of saying to yourself any combination of the below:

--Make this fucking thing be over already
--I wish it didn't have to be this way
--I want this baby but I can't handle it
--I detest that sperm donor
--FML
--I hope it doesn't hurt too much

By the time you get to the damn clinic, you are 100% sure you either can't or don't want to be pregnant any more, for one reason or another.

The end.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
36. It's very Orwellian.
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:17 AM
May 2016

A lot of Republican policies (and this is, despite it being signed by an alleged Democrat) are like that. "Clear Skies Initiative", "No Child Left Behind" etc.

malthaussen

(17,194 posts)
27. It must be a chic word. You know, like "Enhanced Interrogation."
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:24 AM
May 2016

In fact, when you think of it, both "enhancements" are just torture.

-- Mal

3catwoman3

(23,975 posts)
55. Exactly.
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:08 PM
May 2016

"Enhanced reflection" is some mighty fine and fancy obfuscatory terminology.

Reminds me of the "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit" saying.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
29. "Women's Enhanced Reflection Act"
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:31 AM
May 2016

Anyone using weasel word terminology like that is absolutely up to no good.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
39. Yet everyone here cheered when this guy won
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:31 AM
May 2016

Electing "Democrats" is all that matters, right? That's the DU TOS.

niyad

(113,302 posts)
48. of course it does. not to mention how damned insulting it is. women are too damned stupid,
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:43 PM
May 2016

too ignorant, to think for themselves, so we have to MAKE them do it.

a great big FU to all the woman-hating gestational slavers and their enablers. just remember something. NONE of you would be here without women. you ALL came from between a woman's legs (unless a c-section) and THAT is the root of the problem for so many, I think.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
50. Ref for exposure
Fri May 13, 2016, 08:46 PM
May 2016

First, they want women who have to travel to spend the money for one night's lodging, now they want to make it 3? Anyone who doesn't vote for our primary winner needs a kick in the nether regions, because if Trump wins we lose the SC for a long time.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
56. Targeting a specific group for restrictions that don't apply to all groups...
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:48 PM
May 2016

Is unconstitutional.

How do so many incopitants get elected?

locks

(2,012 posts)
57. The only enhancement
Sun May 15, 2016, 04:19 PM
May 2016

in the Women's Enhanced Reflection bill is the size of the male egos in the Legislature. The only people who will suffer are the women who have decided to have a LEGAL abortion and the unwanted children that the Louisiana legislators refuse to care for and educate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does this sound ominous? ...