Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OHhhh, Rachel says CRISTIE is on the list of Unindicted Co-Conspirators - way to go!! (Original Post) UTUSN May 2016 OP
Of course he was in on it malaise May 2016 #1
He Is the One who Probably brought the case montanacowboy May 2016 #2
The Judge Ruled In Favor.... Laxman May 2016 #3
Why is it that we can't coco77 May 2016 #4

montanacowboy

(6,083 posts)
2. He Is the One who Probably brought the case
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:50 PM
May 2016

to stop the release

And will the judge go along with it? Probably. The scum always go free

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
3. The Judge Ruled In Favor....
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:56 PM
May 2016

of the release denying the John Doe motion. It's on appeal to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. If they don't take the appeal the list will be released on Tuesday. Check out the comment section with the Christiebots freaking out about the communists and still insisting this is all a witch hunt.

'John Doe' request to stop release of Bridgegate names denied

A federal judge today denied efforts by an unnamed "John Doe" to keep the names of others tied to the Bridgegate scandal from being disclosed.

The matter was immediately appealed in advance of a Tuesday noon deadline requiring prosecutors to publicly release the list of "unindicted co-conspirators" involved in the politically-motivated 2013 George Washington Bridge lane shutdowns.

A consortium of news organizations—including NJ Advance Media—has been fighting in court to reveal the names—those who federal prosecutors said had conspired in the bridge scheme, or in the subsequent cover-up, but had not been charged.

That effort came in the wake of indictments brought by the U.S. Attorney's office last year against two former associates of Gov. Chris Christie, charging that they had used the bridge as a vehicle for political retribution with the intent to cause massive traffic tie-ups in Fort Lee to punish the Democratic mayor who had declined to endorse Christie for re-election.

In court documents filed in preparation for the trial of William Baroni, the former deputy executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and Bridget Anne Kelly, the governor's former deputy chief of staff, defense attorneys first learned there was a list of other individuals who allegedly played a role in the conspiracy, but had not been charged in the case.


read the rest here: http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2016/05/john_doe_filing_to_hold_up_release_of_bridgegate_n.html#incart_river_home

 

coco77

(1,327 posts)
4. Why is it that we can't
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:58 PM
May 2016

find out the names till after an election and that is in many cases. I believe that Christie will be Trumps vp.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OHhhh, Rachel says CRISTI...