Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiteTara

(29,713 posts)
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:20 PM May 2016

GMOs Are Safe, But Don't Always Deliver On Promises, Top Scientists Say

http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/05/17/478415310/top-scientists-say-gmos-are-safe-but-dont-always-deliver-on-promises

The National Academy of Sciences — probably the country's most prestigious scientific group — has reaffirmed its judgment that GMOs are safe to eat. But the group's new report struck a different tone from previous ones, with much more space devoted to concerns about genetically modified foods, including social and economic ones.

The report marks an anniversary. Twenty years ago, farmers started growing soybeans that had been genetically modified to tolerate the popular weedkiller known as Roundup and corn that contains a protein, extracted from bacteria, that kills some insect pests.

In the years since, arguments about these crops have grown so contentious that the National Academy can't be sure that people will believe whatever it has to say on the topic.

Even before this report came out, an anti-GMO group called Food & Water Watch attacked it. The group accused some members of the committee that prepared the report of receiving research funding from biotech companies, or having other ties to the industry.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GMOs Are Safe, But Don't Always Deliver On Promises, Top Scientists Say (Original Post) WhiteTara May 2016 OP
Not eating them... bkkyosemite May 2016 #1
since they aren't labeled WhiteTara May 2016 #2
Fear is s cool. HuckleB May 2016 #5
Well well,appears we have a bit of Wellstone ruled May 2016 #3
Exactly. HuckleB May 2016 #4
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
3. Well well,appears we have a bit of
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:59 PM
May 2016

descent as per the NPR story. Seems the evidence presented was brought by persons with a agenda. If my memory works at this late stage in life,Bio Scientist keep finding Glyophospate tracers in our food supply,last I recall was,that chemical is one of the so called weed killers. And Pioneer Hybrid Seeds created a Genetic Modified Organism of Glyophosphate and injected that into the genome of Corn. Well,fine and dandy for them,question is what the heck are we doing putting a harmful chemical into one of our main food ingredients . Sure as heck did not increase Corn yields,in fact studies from the U of Nebraska as well as Iowa prove non GMO Corn produces higher yields. Go Figger,must be a profit enhancer Monsanto. Who woulda thunk.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GMOs Are Safe, But Don't ...