Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
Fri May 20, 2016, 05:32 AM May 2016

New analysis: Genetically engineered foods not a health risk

(I know some of the arguments, but this is what people will be reading and thinking, so I thought some might like to see this.).


Genetically engineered crops don’t appear to harm humans or the environment, according to a new report released May 17 by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.

An extensive analysis of two decades’ worth of evidence dug up no substantial proof that genetically engineered foods were any less safe to eat than those that are conventionally bred. The study’s authors also found no conclusive causal link between the engineered crops and environmental problems. The authors note, though, that it’s not always easy to make definitive conclusions; measuring long-term environmental changes is complicated.

The news comes in the midst of political tumult in the United States over laws to label foods made with GE ingredients. But when it comes to food safety and the environment, the authors conclude, how a plant is made isn’t as important as what is actually created.

“It is the product, not the process, that should be regulated,” the authors write.


https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/science-ticker/new-analysis-genetically-engineered-foods-not-health-risk
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New analysis: Genetically engineered foods not a health risk (Original Post) jtuck004 May 2016 OP
the roundup they spray on them is the real problem Viva_La_Revolution May 2016 #1
No it's not. LAGC May 2016 #3
Many humans with their biases won't be convinced by science FLPanhandle May 2016 #2
THE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY SIDE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS HuckleB May 2016 #4
As a side note (i.e., bookmark for future reading), the top link in the petronius May 2016 #5

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
3. No it's not.
Fri May 20, 2016, 12:16 PM
May 2016

People get sick from so-called "organic" foods far more often than they do from mass-produced GMOs with their myriad of quality controls. The entire "organic" food industry is a sham, tricking people into paying more for inferior product. What a racket!

If not for the steady progress of science and GMO foods, there would have been mass starvation across the world and no way we could support a global population of over 7 billion people.

The anti-GMO conspiracists of the left are just as much of an albatross as the climate change deniers on the right.

There's always going to be people opposed to change and progress and the steady march of science. We shouldn't buy into their paranoia and conspiracy theories.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New analysis: Genetically...