Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why didn't they extend the statute of limitations for the longest serving ReTHUG (Original Post) malaise May 2016 OP
Who is "they" in your question? jberryhill May 2016 #1
The Judges and politicians malaise May 2016 #3
I don't understand your point at all jberryhill May 2016 #4
Well, you can find the reason right here Kelvin Mace May 2016 #2
Which norm was torn to shreds? SickOfTheOnePct May 2016 #5

malaise

(268,885 posts)
3. The Judges and politicians
Tue May 24, 2016, 03:38 PM
May 2016

who can move mountains for their given agendas.

Even M$Greedia failed to cover Hastert with the same enthusiasm and there should have been even more

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. I don't understand your point at all
Tue May 24, 2016, 03:42 PM
May 2016

First off, the criminal charges against Cosby were filed within the statute of limitations for sexual assault in Pennsylvania.

Second, Hastert was never accused of doing anything in Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania and Ohio have different laws.

So you seem to be accusing a nebulous and fictional "they" of some kind of inconsistency which exists only in your mind in the first place, as the statute of limitations was NOT extended for Cosby in the first place.

Secondarily, you seem to think the courts of Ohio and Pennsylvania are run by the same people. They aren't.
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
2. Well, you can find the reason right here
Tue May 24, 2016, 03:38 PM
May 2016
Article 1, Section 9

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.


Article 1, Section 10

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

I assume you are referring to the Cosby case, and all I can tell you is that he is being tried in the one jurisdiction where the statute of limitations had not expired. He has faced civil suits for other instances where the statute had expired.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why didn't they extend th...