General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo what exactly is Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe being investigated for?
<snip>
First, the facts: CNN reported the investigation's existence Monday afternoon and seemed to suggest that the inquiry may include McAuliffe's connection to a Chinese billionaire businessman, Wang Wenliang, who has donated to McAuliffe's campaign.
The Washington Post's Matt Zapotosky reported Monday evening that the investigation may be much broader than McAuliffe's ties to Wang. An unnamed government official told Zapotosky that investigators have been scrutinizing McAuliffe's personal finances: "including personal bank records, tax returns and public disclosure forms that date back many years -- and are interested in foreign sources of income."
If true, both those investigations -- and they really are dealing with two different subjects, campaign finances and personal finances -- are serious, says John Dunbar, the political director at the Center for Public Integrity and a campaign finance expert.
"Broadly speaking, any donation that's connected to a foreign national is going to attract a heck of a lot of attention from state and federal investigators," he said (for reasons we'll get into below). But it's also rare for investigators to actually launch an investigation, which takes a ton of public resources, he said.
"If it's in fact true, then it's definitely serious," Dunbar said.
Then there's the question of how McAuliffe's personal finances may fold into this, which raises a whole other set of questions and implications we'll get to.
We spoke with Dunbar and combed through appropriate campaign finance laws to try to better understand what, exactly, the FBI and the Justice Department are investigating about McAuliffe (D). With the caveat that we can't answer that question yet, here's what we do know:
<snip>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/24/so-what-exactly-is-virginia-gov-terry-mcauliffe-being-investigated-for/
grasswire
(50,130 posts)He says something like "we don't know the extent of this investigation".
I think there's a lot he knows that he's not telling yet.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)sorting through that fiasco he has come up. It could be that he's going to be folded into that. God, what a load of bullocks.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Haven't we all seen enough crime shows on TV to know that grabbing an associate to squeeze is very productive? And they apparently surprised him, too!
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Like the last guy. I'm good with that.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)for bad behavior.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I protested in Richmond during the vagina probing with the last guy. It's a touchy subject pardon the obvious, if any tries to compare spongebob vagina probe to McAuliffe.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)We deserve better. I always thought McAuliffe was a weak and crooked lackey, but he came in at just the right time when the guy before him was a total Jeebus warrior vagina prober.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I voted for the dem, a far better choice than the cooch. If a better dem was running I would have voted for him/her. Or I could have just not voted.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Martha Coakely ran against Charlie Baker here in MA in 2014. You may remember her as the only candidate ever to lose to Scott Brown for the US Senate. Well, she ended our wonderful era of Deval Patrick here by losing to Charlie Baker. She was the "party choice" flaws and all, and that's why we lost.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Do some reading on our last governor and get back to us... And then you can question me.
phylny
(8,380 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and also aware of the current governor's rep and ties (what a surprise! your favorite candidate!). As for questioning you, just take that as a given.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)It was not lesser of 2 evils, it was typical insider dem politician vs ban the gay, anti abortion fundie loon gun toting teabagger. And his side kick for Lt governor rev ewwww. It was not a hard choice. McAuliffe got quite a few gop female votes it was such a terrible alternative.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Response to cali (Original post)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)It appears that various lengths of stovepipe are involved, some labeled "the Chinese," others labeled "dark rumors" and "serious if true." Naturally, this all goes directly to the Clinton campaign, and whatever bad conclusions can be drawn must be immediately welded forever to the Clinton campaign.
Meanwhile, it's just too much of a stretch to connect Donald Trump's past public dealings with (for example) organized crime and wonder if that might have an effect on any prospective Trump administration.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I'm sure more on them will emerge if Trump really is the Republican candidate.
How close is McAuliffe to Clinton?
I have some vague idea that they are friends, but I don't know where I got it.
Any information?
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)He had a prominent position during Bill's re-election campaign in 1996 (national chairman?), and he was also a prominent supporter during Hillary's 2008 campaign. Folks from Virginia can probably supply some more information.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... the DNC Chair for 4-5 yrs, and has been tied up with the Clinton's since before they moved into the WH. Here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_McAuliffe
Yip, I think we could call them friends.
Ford_Prefect
(7,895 posts)madville
(7,410 posts)candidates on the same ticket under FBI investigation at the same time may be a bit much I would think.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)So he is on record stating this, I just heard him saying myself.
http://www.fec.gov/pages/brochures/foreign.shtml#Individuals_Green_Card
An immigrant may make a contribution if he or she has a "green card" indicating his or her lawful admittance for permanent residence in the United States.
Quite honestly, the GOP tried to pull this with McAuliffe when he was running for governor.
The Virginia GOP is pissed at him and I smell operatives here.
The what they do know section of the article is an awful lot of hypothesis.
I am serious when I say this, it is really sad that we are so quick to jump on Dems, And in Virginia's case, we should be happy to have a (D) as a Governor.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)governor. Better by far than mcDonald.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I won't settle for less.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)ToxMarz
(2,166 posts)comfortably vote for them because the Democrats are just as bad. The previous Rethuglican Governor was taken down by illegal campaign finance, so the the Democratic Governor must at the very least be tainted with the appearance of illegal campaign financial activity. Even if it is never proven, it is never disproven.
malaise
(268,980 posts)and Dems insist on promoting some seriously compromised folks. Ah well - the entire system stinks
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Just ask Don Siegelman and Elliot Spitzer