Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStartup Employees Invoke Obscure Law to Open Up Books
http://www.wsj.com/article_email/startup-employees-invoke-obscure-law-to-open-up-books-1464082202-lMyQjAxMTA2NjI0NDQyNzQ1WjFor more than a year, Jay Biederman has pestered Domo Inc. for its financial statements. The former manager wants to estimate how much his tens of thousands of shares in the tech startup are worth.
Domo, whose software analyzes corporate data, has rejected those requests, he said, keeping its financial records under wraps like most privately held startups.
But the law may be on Mr. Biedermans side.
He recently discovered section 220 of Delawares corporate law, which can compel locally incorporated companies such as Domo to open up their books to shareholders. The law, little known in Silicon Valley, is a potentially valuable tool for thousands of tech workers who received stock awards to join fast-growing startups, as well as other small investors, who now question their shares worth.
To take advantage of the law, stockholders must simply prove they own at least one share and send the company an affidavit that states which documents they want and why. The magic words for unlocking financial information? For the purpose of valuing my shares, says Michael Halloran, a securities lawyer with Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
Domo, whose software analyzes corporate data, has rejected those requests, he said, keeping its financial records under wraps like most privately held startups.
But the law may be on Mr. Biedermans side.
He recently discovered section 220 of Delawares corporate law, which can compel locally incorporated companies such as Domo to open up their books to shareholders. The law, little known in Silicon Valley, is a potentially valuable tool for thousands of tech workers who received stock awards to join fast-growing startups, as well as other small investors, who now question their shares worth.
To take advantage of the law, stockholders must simply prove they own at least one share and send the company an affidavit that states which documents they want and why. The magic words for unlocking financial information? For the purpose of valuing my shares, says Michael Halloran, a securities lawyer with Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
I wonder what this will do to DE's "incorporate here and leave" strategy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 633 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Startup Employees Invoke Obscure Law to Open Up Books (Original Post)
Recursion
May 2016
OP
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)1. I wonder the same.
I love it when stuff like this bites corporations in the ¥£.
merrily
(45,251 posts)2. This is not a little known law, ffs. Stockholders are owners. Owners of a business are entitled to
disclosure. Directors have a fiduciary duty to make disclosures to stockholders, just as trustees, since long before corporations existed, have had a fiduciary duty to make disclosures to the beneficiaries of the trust. If no one had put it into a statute, it would still be well settled law. It's not rocket science or a secret to anyone, except maybe the author of this article.
Of all publications, the wsj in particular should be ashamed of having published an article containing nonsense like that.