General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow did public restrooms get to be separated by sex in the first place?
Last edited Fri May 27, 2016, 03:12 PM - Edit history (1)
Some argue that one solution to this impasse is to convert all public restrooms to unisex use, thereby eliminating the need to even consider a patrons sex. This might strike some as bizarre or drastic. Many assume that separating restrooms based on a persons biological sex is the natural way to determine who should and should not be permitted to use these public spaces.
In fact, laws in the U.S. did not even address the issue of separating public restrooms by sex until the end of the 19th century, when Massachusetts became the first state to enact such a statute. By 1920, over 40 states had adopted similar legislation requiring that public restrooms be separated by sex.
So why did states in the U.S. begin passing such laws? Were legislators merely recognizing natural anatomical differences between men and women?
MORE HERE: http://yonside.com/public-restrooms-separated-sex/
snooper2
(30,151 posts)40 minutes just to undress and redress with all that shit they wore...
RandySF
(58,728 posts)And I remember, at least in those days, that it had very nice chairs for people to sit as they waited for an available stall.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Holy Shit hats off
RandySF
(58,728 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)It wasn't an issue before indoor toilets became common.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)What difference does it make at all?
Just give it good ventilation.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I stand in line waiting for a urnal or toilet and go in after 5 guys. Thankfully I just have to go number 1. It is disgusting and I see that in a mall as well. Anywhere that you have a busy bathroom, the stalls can be a mess. I can't see women being happy about that.
hlthe2b
(102,214 posts)I'm no obsessive, but honestly, I can't imagine how it doesn't make men ill to use them too. Outhouses are cleaner.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Just as disgusting at times...'girls' are not pretty flowers!
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Retrograde
(10,132 posts)A new trend in the SF region is to have one-at-a-time facilities available to everyone. I hope that puddle on the floor of the one I used last night was just leaky plumbing...
Women-only facilities seem to be a little neater than shared ones, but I'm not basing that on any rigorous study. And if a place is busy, it can get out of hand quickly.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)attacked by men, don't want the man who just followed us around the store staring as we lower/lift our clothes to sit on the tiolet.
Let me remind you that American toilet stalls have large gaps around the doors and some men are into watching women go to the toilet. We are not keen to provide the entertainment.
And then there's the issue of showers and locker rooms...
We have a right to dignity and safety.
hlthe2b
(102,214 posts)That said, my early adolescence (as with many girls my age) was marked by bullying females that made shared locker rooms and bathrooms--especially after gym class unbearable. That is undoubtedly also the case with young boys and their bullying classmates in communal gym locker rooms, showers and bathrooms.
I can't believe this has not been brought up. Privacy issues with communal facilities are not just an issue with presumed opposite gender.
That said, I do support gender identity rights on this issue and those "Xian" males that are going into women's restrooms to make some kind of point need to be prosecuted. Certainly not the transgendered...
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)Not to marginalize transgender people.
hlthe2b
(102,214 posts)I in NO way suggested support for marginalizing transgender people--quite the opposite-- and I resent your implication that I did.
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)...your response to Boudica the Lyoness. I think you misunderstood my meaning. I could have been more clear.
hlthe2b
(102,214 posts)and sorry for the misunderstanding.
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)That is the big issue to me with public restrooms.
Men can assault women anywhere. I think it's irrational to assume they will now pretend to be transgendered to follow women into restrooms and attack them, when they don't really need to go to the trouble.
And transgender women or men are not a threat to anyone, by and large, but they have more to fear from others.
I really need think we need to focus on privacy for everyone in these situations. Whether the space itself is unisex or not, all business needs to be done behind closed doors, for everyone's sake.
Same with locker rooms. No more of this changing in front of others. Some of us have always had issues with that. Some may think that's silly, but it is a very real anxiety.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Surely it's enough to provide a few stalls for those who are uncomfortable changing in front of others?
alarimer
(16,245 posts)The point being, is that there should be options for those who desire more privacy.
And schools need to protect kids from bullying in locker rooms. More privacy in changing areas would mean less excuses for avoiding PE.
astral
(2,531 posts)I had just been wondering about that recently, at the health club women tend to cover up with a towel as they walk around or in the sauna, and I don't, as, hey, it's a women's locker room and we're all women. It's my age, I guess.
I had always thought of women's restrooms as a safe place BECAUSE there can be no men around. It is also a place where, at times, especially in our younger years, where women can talk about stuff where no men are around.
Young boys are known to go to the women's room with their Mommys, why, because sending them unescorted into the men's room is not considered safe. Laws are NOT going to change the facts.
I dont want little girls and grown men in the same restroom (unless they are with their father or male guardian who needs to do it that way for whatever reason, just like mothers do with sons). I would not use a toilet shared by men in the same room with me with nothing but a peep-thru stall to separate us, I dont care if he's not trying to peep at me, I still couldn't do it.
But, sooner or later all us old fogies will die off and the brainwashed young will learn there are no lines drawn between the sexes, no Mommy, no Daddy, just Parental Unit One, Two, maybe Three and Four, parental rights have already been eliminated, just in case nobody has noticed.
My mind is a confused fog over transgender persons, so I will not take a stand on that, but the lines aren't even drawn on that, it's just whichever bathroom you identify with that day.
I also am troubled by gradeschool, or even PRE-gradeschool kids being questioned about their gender identity. I say just don't make a big deal about it if they say they're a girl when they're a boy or vice versa. They will either find out it's true, or they will grow out of it in their own time probably when puberty sets in and they are called to be who they really are. Many people really are bi-sexual, too, so let's not try to pigeonhole them as children.
The whole restroom topic just sorta breaks my brain. I was past high school before I found out there really are gay people, it's not a joke. Those were the days, I guess!
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)That's a Fox News talking point.
Transgender people don't swing back and forth between transgender and cisgender status on a daily basis.
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)All dressing and undressing happens in private changing rooms. Seems like that could be applied to the other locker rooms, too.
frankieallen
(583 posts)Piss and pubic hair, don't want to sit in a stall next to a male taking a nasty dump and farting, prefer a clean area to wash up after,.... Shall I continue?
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Moving on ...