Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 01:27 AM Jun 2016

Bank of America fires employee for this facebook post



http://www.myajc.com/news/news/racist-facebook-post-claims-another-victim-bank-of/nrYwL/



The very Facebook that Lindgren loathed reacted in kind, blasting her for her comments and flooding Bank of America with calls, emails and social media posts.

“Christine McMullen Lindgren wrote a horrifically racist, anti-Black comment on Facebook and she proudly listed you, Bank of America, as her employer,” one person posted on Facebook. “Does she represent the racist values you strive for or the ones you’ve promised to abandon?”


“Does Christine McMullen Lindgren really work for you? If she is one of your employees, are you going to take action against her?” someone else wrote. “Failure to do so sends a very loud message to your current African-American customers. I’m sure possible new customers will have a second thought before opening an account with Bank of America if this is not addressed properly.”

“I hope this company’s values do not align with Christine’s,” wrote another woman, offering to send the bank screenshots. “Let this be a lesson to those who choose to be nasty on the Internet and believe their actions have no repercussion. Please, let me and others who have reported her know that this situation will be taken care of. Thank you.”

By 1 p.m. Thursday, Bank of America had let them know.

Andy Aldridge, a senior vice president and communications manager for the bank, confirmed that Lindgren had worked at the bank and that the comments were “reprehensible and unacceptable.”
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bank of America fires employee for this facebook post (Original Post) Liberal_in_LA Jun 2016 OP
Wow. Absolutely vile. saltpoint Jun 2016 #1
chair enid602 Jun 2016 #3
Trump U. LOL. Does Trump U have saltpoint Jun 2016 #4
I believe the statue in this clip would do mythology Jun 2016 #43
I could definitely see Trump saltpoint Jun 2016 #69
lol! nt ecstatic Jun 2016 #6
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes Major Nikon Jun 2016 #2
Truly, this. Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #10
I'm going to borrow this response. It's so apropos. NightWatcher Jun 2016 #27
Well, her post going viral will ruin her life. Sadly, PatrickforO Jun 2016 #5
If this is true, passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #7
I doubt she will learn it even then Major Nikon Jun 2016 #11
Who said she will learn? She will probably blame blacks for her being fired. Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #28
based on her writing she should have been there already, she obviously isn't very bright snooper2 Jun 2016 #39
I just shake my head rpannier Jun 2016 #8
I just had a horrible thought GummyBearz Jun 2016 #67
Another heartwarming tale from "post-racial America." Chakab Jun 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Jun 2016 #12
I am sure BOA asked her if she posted it. nt Logical Jun 2016 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Jun 2016 #63
They even said "After a brief investigation", and the woman has not said she was framed. nt Logical Jun 2016 #64
1st amendment doesn't protect idiots from the wrath of the boss, only the government restricting Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #13
In this case, people reported her to her employer nxylas Jun 2016 #14
Because every Facebook account is 100% legit. Califonz Jun 2016 #15
I am sure BOA asked her if she posted it. nt Logical Jun 2016 #60
If you are going to post stupid stuff to the internet, ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #16
Fired for something that had nothing to do with her job? MichMan Jun 2016 #17
You can't possibly think that any black customer of her's... MrScorpio Jun 2016 #19
You would need to know what is in the BOA Employee Handbook for starters. avebury Jun 2016 #20
This has everything to do with her job gollygee Jun 2016 #23
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! malaise Jun 2016 #65
She feels this way about many of her customers... Phentex Jun 2016 #24
I honestly can't tell if you're serious or just trolling... Blue_Tires Jun 2016 #29
I think he's just going for the negative attention at DU JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #31
Exactly! mountain grammy Jun 2016 #42
Look at her post on facebook Mendocino Jun 2016 #47
FFS, what is wrong with you? I would fire her dumb ass also. Not the type of person I want..... Logical Jun 2016 #66
One day... MrScorpio Jun 2016 #18
Won't someone think of White 'Murica's tears that need to be dried??? HughBeaumont Jun 2016 #21
Sometimes the wheel of Karma rolls quickly. hobbit709 Jun 2016 #22
sometimes what we think is private is not dembotoz Jun 2016 #25
And she got four likes. gollygee Jun 2016 #26
The people who "liked" the post should be identified as well philosslayer Jun 2016 #30
Only one JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #32
I also see gollygee Jun 2016 #34
Ahh - see that one now JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #35
This is further evidence that people who hold such beliefs deutsey Jun 2016 #33
If a particular, preening, petulant, petty, profusely prevaricating prick... MrScorpio Jun 2016 #37
She should look at the positive romanic Jun 2016 #36
Most places I've worked have language that explains why this sort of thing can end a job. ladyVet Jun 2016 #38
I would have fired her on the basis of her incoherent writing, before I bullwinkle428 Jun 2016 #40
That's quite the hate filled run-on sentence. Ace Rothstein Jun 2016 #41
Making America great again! The Trump campaign will hire here.. mountain grammy Jun 2016 #44
Maybe the Klan has an opening? Mendocino Jun 2016 #45
Enjoy your hate filled existence Christine. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #46
Here's my problem with this: Oneironaut Jun 2016 #48
They said they investigated gollygee Jun 2016 #49
Good point. How many people would look that far, though? Oneironaut Jun 2016 #50
I'm sure her employer would gollygee Jun 2016 #51
Not to mention if they did not investigate properly, and terminated her employment Glassunion Jun 2016 #56
Wow Trump has made it "cool" to be a racist bigot! redstatebluegirl Jun 2016 #52
That's called, "asking to be fired." tabasco Jun 2016 #53
I would like to think that BOA Mendocino Jun 2016 #54
Total lack of Awareness and the Truth 4Q2u2 Jun 2016 #55
For what it's worth Different Drummer Jun 2016 #57
Also, there's an article on her somewhere Different Drummer Jun 2016 #62
Freedom of Speech =/= Freedom from Consequences. JBoy Jun 2016 #58
+1,000. n/t Different Drummer Jun 2016 #61
Will she now file for the dreaded welfare? I wonder if she will get the cosmic irony? Rex Jun 2016 #68

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
1. Wow. Absolutely vile.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 01:33 AM
Jun 2016

The Trump campaign probably contacted her immediately after termination to offer her a job.

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
69. I could definitely see Trump
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 05:31 PM
Jun 2016

contending for such an award.

Possibly in the Lifetime Achievement category.

PatrickforO

(15,420 posts)
5. Well, her post going viral will ruin her life. Sadly,
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 01:49 AM
Jun 2016

she will become unemployable and will experience the very poverty she claims it so easy to lift oneself out of. She will understand the humiliation of shopping with a food stamp card, and have to watch deferred maintenance build up on her house and car while she prays nothing she cannot afford happens to either. She'll end up getting a shitty job where she's supervised by a coldhearted jerk and will live in fear of getting fired, because that may mean losing her home.

Horrible way to learn the lesson of empathy.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
7. If this is true,
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:00 AM
Jun 2016

I hope she doesn't have children. And if she does, I hope she hasn't passed on her racism to therm.

Major Nikon

(36,925 posts)
11. I doubt she will learn it even then
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:43 AM
Jun 2016

She will always feel she is superior regardless of her situation. It's really the only thing she has to establish self worth, and that's the saddest part of all.

Dustlawyer

(10,539 posts)
28. Who said she will learn? She will probably blame blacks for her being fired.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:34 AM
Jun 2016

She is a victim of the propaganda that has been spewed to displace the blame of our crappy economy onto minorities and immigrants. TPTB want us to believe others are the cause of our problems, not the fact that the wealthy pay no taxes and suck up all of our tax dollars in government contracts awarded because they bought our Representatives.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
39. based on her writing she should have been there already, she obviously isn't very bright
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:50 AM
Jun 2016

rpannier

(24,915 posts)
8. I just shake my head
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:30 AM
Jun 2016

I would love to know what people are thinking as they post this stuff on facebook and twit
I would like to think there's something that would tell them this is a dumb thing to do
Do they re-read their post?
It's not like a bar, where they blurt something dumb out in a drunken moment

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
67. I just had a horrible thought
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:17 PM
Jun 2016

I leave my facebook password remembered so I just click login. What if someone were to login and write a nasty thing like that as a joke, or to intentionally get me fired, without me even knowing it? I have had a (now ex) girlfriend go through my facebook private messages before when I was out of the room. I removed all my passwords, but the inconvenience was annoying

Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)

Response to Logical (Reply #59)

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
64. They even said "After a brief investigation", and the woman has not said she was framed. nt
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jun 2016
 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
13. 1st amendment doesn't protect idiots from the wrath of the boss, only the government restricting
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:56 AM
Jun 2016

free speech.

Buh bye, klans woman!

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
14. In this case, people reported her to her employer
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:06 AM
Jun 2016

I'm still not happy about the overall trend of employers snooping on their employees' social media posts. This particular case seems clear-cut, but generally speaking, I hate the idea of companies that won't even pay their employees enough to live on expecting to be able to monitor and control those employees' entire lives.

 

Califonz

(465 posts)
15. Because every Facebook account is 100% legit.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:25 AM
Jun 2016

I know because I'm friends with Hugh Jass, Amanda Huggenkiss, and Warren Peece.

ManiacJoe

(10,138 posts)
16. If you are going to post stupid stuff to the internet,
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:49 AM
Jun 2016

it is recommended that you not use your real name and not link to your employer.

MichMan

(17,117 posts)
17. Fired for something that had nothing to do with her job?
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:13 AM
Jun 2016

Am I the only bothered by the fact that she was fired for a Facebook post that had nothing to do with her employment? Her post made no mention of BoA nor anything regarding her job.

Yet previous posters seem to celebrate her being fired for comments, as vile as they are, that were made outside of her employment.

MrScorpio

(73,772 posts)
19. You can't possibly think that any black customer of her's...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:54 AM
Jun 2016

Would have a reasonable expectation of impartial service, would you? This woman was responsible for other people's money, deposited inside of that bank... People who rely on a bank employees' professional judgement and service no matter what.

If this woman was so blatantly biased against black people in general, how can any black customer expect her to do right by them?

Besides, she made it very clear on the same FB page where she posted her vile, bigoted comments that she was an employee of the BOA. Seeing how BOA already had a bad rep about racist hiring practices, the company that she represented felt that it was in their best interest to dissociate itself from her, her comments and her ideology. They're in the business to make money... To the BOA, money is GREEN, whether it's of their black customers, their white customers or any other customer.

Clearly it's not in the interest of the BOA to look racially biased by association in so obvious a case.

avebury

(11,196 posts)
20. You would need to know what is in the BOA Employee Handbook for starters.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:57 AM
Jun 2016

There could be language in it that prohibits behavior that would show BOA in an unfavorable light to the public. What probably sunk her with BOA was that it is alleged that her FB page mentioned that she was proud about her employment with them as well as publicizing her extreme racist attitudes. That kind of stuff tends to get the public slamming a company (facebook, emails, phone calls, and so on). Had she left BOA out of her FB page she might have been able to keep her job because people might not have known where she works. Look at the daycare that employees the woman whose child went into the gorilla moat. They ended up taking their FB page down.

Most Banks tend to be pretty conservative and they get enough bad publicity on their own without crap like this. For sure, even had they not terminated her employment, they could not have allowed to her work with the public in any manner.

Social media is a double edged sword. What you put out there always has the potential to come back on you and smack you in the head. Some people just don't get that part of the process.

Edit to add: OK she is a personal banker, in Atlanta. There was no way she was going to survive her idiocy and keep her job. She brought bad publicity to the bank and it would have cost the bank business.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
23. This has everything to do with her job
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:19 AM
Jun 2016

There's a lot of racism in the banking industry. If you can't get rid of even the most blatant racists, how can that ever be fixed?

Phentex

(16,708 posts)
24. She feels this way about many of her customers...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:22 AM
Jun 2016

so it DOES have to do with her job. How can you not see that?

Plus, it shows a lack of intelligence which the bank may want.

JustAnotherGen

(38,041 posts)
31. I think he's just going for the negative attention at DU
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:43 AM
Jun 2016

Seriously - any true liberal or progressive ally of black people would understand -

Our money is just as green as that in the pockets of white Americans -

And I demand to know WHO I'm giving my money to. I need to know what kind of person you are.

I don't understand this segment of liberals/progressives that don't get -

We don't like giving our money to 'those' people. So we need them outed and removed from the financial stream. I'll pay my taxes so she can have TANF and SNAP if necessasy.

Mendocino

(8,484 posts)
47. Look at her post on facebook
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jun 2016

a bit deeper. She stated "personal banker at Bank of America" along with birthplace, her college and present location.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
66. FFS, what is wrong with you? I would fire her dumb ass also. Not the type of person I want.....
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:14 PM
Jun 2016

to work for me.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
21. Won't someone think of White 'Murica's tears that need to be dried???
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:09 AM
Jun 2016

"PC" = "I should be alloweds to say '(insert racial slur here)', '(insert homophobic slur here)', '(insert ethnic slur here)' or '(insert sexist slur here)' without these libs runnin their big fat YAPPERS about it!"

The problem with many of these people is that their culture is "America 30 Years Ago" and never figured out how to adapt to 2016.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
26. And she got four likes.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:28 AM
Jun 2016

I can't believe people at DU are defending her, or at least looking for any possible "reasonable explanation" as so often happens when there's an incident of racism. I'm sure she would have told them if her Facebook was hacked.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
30. The people who "liked" the post should be identified as well
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:38 AM
Jun 2016

And THEIR employers notified.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
34. I also see
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:48 AM
Jun 2016

One person saying that BOA shoulnd't have acted as "judge jury and executioner" and one saying "because Facebook is always legit" or something, which sounds like they're saying that this person should be given the benefit of the doubt because sometimes people use fake names on Facebook.

JustAnotherGen

(38,041 posts)
35. Ahh - see that one now
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:56 AM
Jun 2016

Yeah -

There was no judge, jury, or executioner.

Employer - Employee.

Employee offensive to a group of people the Employer has a HISTORY or racist behavior towards.

Black people were taxed to save their asses.

She was fired.

It happens every day.

People need to worry about their own checkbooks and not others.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
33. This is further evidence that people who hold such beliefs
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:45 AM
Jun 2016

increasingly feel there's no need to hide them or to use racist dog-whistle language anymore.

MrScorpio

(73,772 posts)
37. If a particular, preening, petulant, petty, profusely prevaricating prick...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:47 AM
Jun 2016

Is picked to perform presidentially, his off-putting, phylogenetic pandering will please plenty of pronounced pink pigmentation preferers to proclaim themselves.

That's for sure.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
36. She should look at the positive
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:59 AM
Jun 2016

She won't have to pay for those kids that black moms can't "afford" because now she's broke and unemployed.

Karma always wins in the end.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
38. Most places I've worked have language that explains why this sort of thing can end a job.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:48 AM
Jun 2016

Anything an employee does that could come back on the employer results in termination. She evidently had something that let people know who she worked for, and it obviously didn't paint BoA in a good light, so down she went.

People seem to think that because Trump can get away with the stuff he says, they can too. Doesn't work that way.

bullwinkle428

(20,662 posts)
40. I would have fired her on the basis of her incoherent writing, before I
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:57 AM
Jun 2016

even got to the despicable racism.

Oneironaut

(6,289 posts)
48. Here's my problem with this:
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:55 AM
Jun 2016

What if I hate someone so much that I decide to create a profile picture with their name and face, and then write a vile message like this. Then, I report it to that person's employer to get them fired. It would work 100% of the time. This is why I hate social media.

I'm sure that this is actually this woman's posting, but imagine for a second that it isn't. What if it was the doing of a vile, vengeful person who wanted to destroy her life? Something to consider. We trust that these stories are true, but sometimes they aren't.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
49. They said they investigated
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jun 2016

Which might have meant simply asking her.

Of course it's also easy to tell if a Facebook account is new or if a person has been using it for a long time. If she's been posting photos of herself and her family here and there for ages, it's a legit page.

Oneironaut

(6,289 posts)
50. Good point. How many people would look that far, though?
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:10 AM
Jun 2016

Our media is so crappy that it uses Twitter as a legitimate news source. Hopefully BoA actually confirmed that this person wrote the message, and didn't just say, "People are outraged. Let's fire the employee to please them so that we don't look bad."

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
51. I'm sure her employer would
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:12 AM
Jun 2016

They said they investigated and they had until 1 pm, so they had a morning to look into it.

People don't just fire people instantly. This is pretty quick, but it did give plenty of time to look into her Facebook and to simply ask her.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
56. Not to mention if they did not investigate properly, and terminated her employment
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:44 AM
Jun 2016

she would have grounds to sue BofA for wrongful termination.

Could you imagine how badly you would sue a former employer who terminates you for something this terrible, if in fact you were not the responsible party? There would be a huge opportunity for a libel suit.

redstatebluegirl

(12,827 posts)
52. Wow Trump has made it "cool" to be a racist bigot!
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jun 2016

Good for BOA for firing her. They will be screaming "free speech" and we hate "politically correctness" but this has to be stopped.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
53. That's called, "asking to be fired."
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jun 2016

A vile racist with anger issues. The employer made the correct decision.

Mendocino

(8,484 posts)
54. I would like to think that BOA
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:31 AM
Jun 2016

did this because it was the ethical thing to do rather than them losing money from people threatening to pull their accounts. Bottom line always runs business.

 

4Q2u2

(1,406 posts)
55. Total lack of Awareness and the Truth
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jun 2016

I hope she was not a loan officer. If she was, I wonder how many AA she denied loans to, based on her expert knowledge of race.
BOA had to fire her. Any minority seeking a loan would be able to point to her post and tie BOA to her racist attitude and prove that they did not have a fair and equal chance of benefit.

A BOA employee blaming minorities for a poor economy, now that is rich. Maybe with all her free time she might investigate her former employers record in the housing meltdown.
I mean who knew that the poor and underprivileged in this country held sway over a trillion dollar economy.

Different Drummer

(9,083 posts)
62. Also, there's an article on her somewhere
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:11 PM
Jun 2016

that, I believe said, she is over 50. I can't remember exactly what the article listed her age as being. 50+ is not the best time of life to be looking for employment--if, in fact, she can find any at all.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
68. Will she now file for the dreaded welfare? I wonder if she will get the cosmic irony?
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jun 2016

I kid, she will pretend to be the victim for the rest of her life.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bank of America fires emp...