General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"My conscience won't let me go shoot my brother, or some darker people, or some poor hungry people."
"My conscience won't let me go shoot my brother, or some darker people, or some poor hungry people in the mud for big powerful America. And shoot them for what? They never called me nigger, they never lynched me, they didn't put no dogs on me, they didn't rob me of my nationality, rape and kill my mother and father... Shoot them for what? How can I shoot them poor people? Just take me to jail."raging moderate
(4,305 posts)And to the rest of us.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)unblock
(52,227 posts)seems like a one-off kind of decision that should have been resolved in ali's favor by a lower court.
then again, many people just had it in for ali, which no doubt had much to do with why he had to go all the way to the top court.
that said, the supreme court generally prefers to clarify law and establish judicial guidelines and principles, and this really did none of that, being decided on a technicality.
on the merits, in the end, i'm not sure ali would have won. i'm not disputing that his beliefs weren't sincere, but i was under the impression that conscientious objector status couldn't pick and choose which war to fight in. if ali objected to the war in vietnam, but believed that war was ok if called for by "allah or the messenger", then i would think that would disqualify him from conscientious objector status.
regardless, i admire him for sticking to his principles, even at the expense of several years of what would have been the peak of a career that was incredible even without being able to box during that time.
Logical
(22,457 posts)H2O Man
(73,537 posts)that people should be aware of. The SC was set to uphold Ali's conviction, until a young lawyer requested a Justice read "The Autobiography of Malcolm X." That book was what changed the decision.
unblock
(52,227 posts)the author of what was to be the majority opinion changed his mind, so it would have been 4-4, which would have upheld the conviction, but without any written opinion or explanation.
opting instead for the alternative of overturning it based on a technicality seems to have been influenced by a desire to avoid not having any explanation for a decision in a high profile case.
my guess is that voting to overturn based on a technicality won the day thanks to a desire by the justices, in the end, to avoid tackling the substantive issues, while at the same time avoiding not putting out any opinion at all.
FourScore
(9,704 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)when he poked the real americans in their eye with a big stick with this statement of absolute truth and no compromising principle and integrity. This statement is on my wall in very big letters.
yellerpup
(12,253 posts)He had no fear. He was truly The Greatest!
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... of mostly white people and didn't show hide nor hair in the "southern states" where I'm sure West would've loved to explain his language or critique about Obama to the "southern state" people.
No... not at all...
jalan48
(13,865 posts)braddy
(3,585 posts)mountain grammy
(26,621 posts)He was right and he was vindicated. A bright light of humanity has left us.. rest in peace, Ali.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)At that time, it took real guts and commitment.
Logical
(22,457 posts)He would of toured bases, sparring with troops, etc.
So it is ever a bigger deal that he stood up and said no IMO.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)Within days of arriving in Vietnam I realized what we were doing there was Wrong as Wrong can be. Every time I see a Vietnamese Person I want to go up to them and grab and hold them tight and apologize for what my country did to them. The kids doing the fighting I can't fault cause we were lied to to get us there to begin with but the generals and politicians I damn sure can cuss them. The Vietnamese People did nothing to us. They were trying to protect their homes is all. Same as I would do if someone came and invaded us here in America.
Yes Jane Fonda, Mohammad Ali and my late friends brother, Jimmy Smith, who went to Canada rather than return for the third time to Vietnam are my HERO's and I'm damn sure Proud of it. The hell with the war mongers.
I am a man of my convictions as well.
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)FairWinds
(1,717 posts)helped many of us better understand race relations, such
as they are - and were.
He was absolutely right about Vietnam.
Veteran For Peace (Vietnam, 1968-69)
Logical
(22,457 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)Godspeed sir.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)But this nation's corrupt "leaders" chose to follow a path of war upon war mostly for no valid reason whatsoever.
This is what happens after we let the elected miscreants get away with Vietnam. They never had to answer for the Gulf of Tonkin lies or the abuses that came after. Since then, ever so often, we just have to have another war of profit.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)a man of true courage and conviction. in peace he is on his journey.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)He taught us so many things but the best thing we learned was to stand up against wrong. To have the courage to say no.
Ellen Forradalom
(16,160 posts)I've been re-reading Hannah Arendt's "Origins of Totalitarianism." In one chapter she discusses how stateless people and minorities with no government to represent them have the fewest rights, that civil rights precedes human rights. Ali names his statelessness and rightlessness. No wonder he enraged so many.
Logical
(22,457 posts)4bucksagallon
(975 posts)If he was on the SC, had found his voice, and wasn't asleep at the time..... But of course Thomas WAS a draft dodging coward.
13Dogs
(45 posts)"While many scorned Alis decision at the time" - 49 years later it's crystal clear that Ali was on the right side of history with respect to the Vietnam War. The fact that he stuck by his principles, despite the vicious condemnation from the authoritarians and war mongers, speaks volumes of the strength and goodness of this man. He asked the brilliant question, why would I want to go and kill poor people living in the mud for big. powerful America? The fact that question is still sadly relevant almost 50 years later, doesn't say a lot for the human race's progress towards a peaceful planet...but make no mistake, Ali sure did his part, and then some, towards that goal. He was a giant...
Logical
(22,457 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Jnclr89
(128 posts)knock out.