General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJetBlue pilot decides this outfit is unacceptable. woman told to change

A JetBlue passenger says the airline has apologized to her after gate agents at Logan Airport forced her to change her shorts because they were too short, CBS Boston reports.
The woman from Seattle, a burlesque performer who goes by the name Maggie McMuffin, told CBS station KIRO-TV she was stopped after she tried to board a connecting flight at Logan May 18 wearing a sweater, thigh high socks and shorts.
She said she was told, "The flight crew had discussed it and the pilot had decided that I needed to put something else on or I would not be allowed to board the flight."
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/jetblue-passenger-stopped-from-boarding-plane-because-shorts-were-too-short/
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)provided that he or she does not discriminate based upon race, sex, religion, or handicap.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Discrimination.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)The captain could decide that nobody wearing purple was allowed to fly, and there would be no grounds for a lawsuit. If, however, he ordered all Muslims to leave the plane then there would be. (Of course in either case he would probably be fired by the airline).
Rex
(65,616 posts)I get the point, just trying to guess what the poster meant and that was my guess. I guess it would be a frivolous lawsuit, but they do get filed too.
I just wonder what danger the passenger brought onboard, besides a bad taste in clothing.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,270 posts)Poor Maggie.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Vinca
(53,994 posts)It's not the most outrageous thing anyone has worn when flying in a sardine can.
Initech
(108,783 posts)Pilots shouldn't give two shits about what someone is wearing.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Wonder why it was the pilot...I mean, they usually don't see the passengers.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Because you're sitting in a cramped plane and you mostly look at the backside of the seat in front of you.
Pretty pointless, in my opinion.
lpbk2713
(43,273 posts)I see no problem here.
Warpy
(114,615 posts)It looks like a come-as-you-are bet was lost or maybe she's just terminally tacky. I imagine the reasoning was that her legs and bum were insufficiently protected to manage the emergency slide in case of trouble.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)cutroot
(1,026 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)LuckyLib
(7,052 posts)Hugely overweight men in tank tops who commandeer both arm rests.
malthaussen
(18,567 posts)And those pants were acceptable at weddings in 1971.
-- Mal
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)I agree she has the right to wear this outfit, but at the same time my inner woman screams "omg that outfit is hideous!!!!!!!!!!!"