General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt would be great if Jill Stein (who hates Hillary) would for the sake of country ask the Greens
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by tammywammy (a host of the General Discussion forum).
to support Hillary. The Dems have so much more in common with the Greens at this point. They would be able to have almost as much influence on the platform in July as BS supporters, although not officially on the committee. People of mutual interests need to come together to defeat the GOP, no matter who their candidate ends up being.
I really don't see why the Greens can't or won't do this. Talk about a "revolution!" That would be one. The Libertarians have almost cut off the Greens at this point.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)How does the Green Party not care about America's well-being?
Are you suggesting the Green Party does not deserve to exist? What it is?
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)2000 was a perfect example where Nader used the green party to throw a wrench into the democratic side of the election....and succeeded
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Well I can not blame them for not giving a crap about the democratic party, but 'america's well being?"
Are you kidding me????
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)first made me like Mrs Obama was a local encounter she had at an ice cream shop around the corner with a guy in a Green Party tee shirt. She walked in, looked at the room and made a bee line to the Green and asked for that vote with a big smile of the sort one offers to allies.
Good thing Michelle Obama does not have your attitude.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)one of the other party candidates? It's kinda the whole point of being in a third party not to do that.
And no one really cares what's in the platform.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)to Bernie to help work in the coming political revolution.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)This reminds me of the people predicting the end times. The date always gets pushed back.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)it reminds you of.
MADem
(135,425 posts)She certainly has a good opinion of herself!
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/25/jill_stein_pens_open_letter_to_bernie_sanders_green_party_presidential_candidate_invites_sanders_to_cooperate_on_political_revolution/
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Did you somehow miss the big red stop sign when you began to post?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)"For the sake of the country" HUH?
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)I don't think you're going to get your wish.
rogerashton
(3,920 posts)New York is the exception. In New York, it would be legal for the Greens to put HRC in the ballot as their candidate for president; in that case (on the one hand) Green votes would count toward HRC in determining New York's vote in the electoral college, but (on the other hand) those votes would count to keep the Greens on the ballot in the next election. In other states, a two-party consensus makes this impossible under electoral law (since both of the major parties would prefer to keep other parties off the ballot entirely.) It would be good if, in the future, the Democratic Party would change its position on this.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)a thriving Working Families Party that regularly cross nominates with the Democrats. Any State could do that if they wanted to. NY is not THE exception, it is one of eight exceptions. Along with NY and Oregon, CT, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, South Carolina and Vermont make up the eight States with some form of electoral fusion.
rogerashton
(3,920 posts)and, agreed, it is not a DNC thing. As I said, it is bipartisan, in most states. And it could be costly to either major party in given circumstances. The OP was saying that the bGreens should support Hillary, and these electoral laws make it essentially suicidal -- from a party point of view. As we sow so shall we reap.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)There is very little in common. I cannot see any 'endorsement' of Hillary coming. If Hillary wanted votes from the Left, she wouldn't have been so Rightwing. Clinton political expediency triangulation kind of blew up in her face. Sucks for her, and the RW Democrats who thought she'd be a good candidate.
demmiblue
(36,841 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)as with the moderate republicans who claim they did not leave the party but the party left them...i am beginning to understand how that feels
Warpy
(111,245 posts)Jeez.....
Beowulf
(761 posts)Might mimic some Green ideas, however, the two parties have few similarities in values and ultimate goals. The Clinton wing is much more comfortable hanging out with the GOP than the Greens.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)... to garner an endorsement like that. I somehow don't see that happening any time soon.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)You can repost in General Discussion: Primaries