Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCivil forfeiture: Oklahoma cops are now coming for your prepaid debit cards, too, not just cash
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/oklahoma-police-erad_us_57584060e4b0e39a28ac2083The Oklahoma Department of Public Safety has purchased Electronic Recovery and Access to Data machines for installation in Oklahoma Highway Patrol and Oklahoma City police cruisers, according to an Oklahoma Watch report published Tuesday. The device tells officers the balance of prepaid debit cards and gift cards, and allows them to seize the money if they determine its suspicious. ERAD readers also can provide limited information about pretty much any card with a magnetic strip, including bank debit cards and credit cards.
Oklahoma has become a battleground in the debate over civil asset forfeiture reform in recent years, prompted by high-profile cases of cops using the practice to take cash and property from innocent people often without charging them with a crime. Thanks to the new ERAD readers, police can now access peoples electronic funds as well.
Each ERAD reader is costing the state about $5,000, plus about $1,500 for training. The state has agreed to pay the manufacturer, ERAD Group, 7.7 percent of all funds forfeited with the readers.
...
Oklahomas deal with ERAD Group adds a twist giving a share of the seized assets to a private company.
...
He added, If the police are willing to seize $1,000 worth of cash, I think theyre going to be just as likely to seize $1,000 that they find on a debit card.
Vincent, of the Highway Patrol, was quick to downplay these concerns. He told Oklahomas News 9 that the ERAD devices so far were being used to focus on identity theft, not seizing funds from motorists prepaid cash cards.
State Senator Kyle Loveless said the states lack of reporting standards makes it impossible to know how the new technology will affect civil asset forfeiture.
Theres not a record, Loveless said. Theres not a procedure in place. Theres not policy in place. They dont have to report it to us if they had used it.
Loveless said police didnt discuss the ERAD machines with lawmakers before making the decision to buy them. He learned about the development after reading the report from Oklahoma Watch.
--------------
No procedures, no protocol, no safeguards, no reporting... And now not only the cops get a cut of your money, but a corporation, too. No way this will be abused...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 689 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Civil forfeiture: Oklahoma cops are now coming for your prepaid debit cards, too, not just cash (Original Post)
DetlefK
Jun 2016
OP
You think Hillary Clinton is going to nominate justices opposed to asset forfeiture?
Fumesucker
Jun 2016
#4
raging moderate
(4,304 posts)1. This is a clear violation of the Constitution.
Property should not be seized without due process of law.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)8. If we were to actually abide by the constitution ...
... law enforcement wouldn't even be able to check the balance on the card without a warrant.
raging moderate
(4,304 posts)9. You are correct.
What have we come to?
madokie
(51,076 posts)2. This pisses me off to no end
gollygee
(22,336 posts)3. This is ridiculously wrong
We need a dem. stacked SCOTUS and a case to go to it.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)4. You think Hillary Clinton is going to nominate justices opposed to asset forfeiture?
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)6. Justices??? How about lawmakers opposed to asset forfeiture?
The point of these forfeitures is exactly that the punishment comes before there even is a case who can go to trial.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)7. More likely than trump. N/t
safeinOhio
(32,674 posts)5. Always leave home without it
if you might travel in Oklahoma.