Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Occupy Democrats came up with a perfect response to Yertle's BS about Soc. Sec. (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 OP
K & R... dhill926 Jun 2016 #1
Mitch is right. erlewyne Jun 2016 #24
Also, the Republicans want to poison any cooperation they can't Akamai Jun 2016 #51
I suspect Republicons plan to convert FICA to a plain tax on lower-income workers. raging moderate Jun 2016 #2
well they are actually the dumb ones hill2016 Jun 2016 #3
Scrap the cap. raging moderate Jun 2016 #4
Bingo!!!! Wellstone ruled Jun 2016 #6
well hill2016 Jun 2016 #7
Social Security does NOT run out in 2035!!! Get your basic facts straight. wolfie001 Jun 2016 #12
Even better... freebrew Jun 2016 #13
Yes freebrew!!! wolfie001 Jun 2016 #14
Absolutely. tecelote Jun 2016 #16
Senator Sanders liberal from boston Jun 2016 #64
I used to know the history better... freebrew Jun 2016 #66
Agree deist99 Jun 2016 #52
Makes perfect sense to me! wolfie001 Jun 2016 #62
Agreed! ChaunceyGardenier Jun 2016 #65
Her candidate has expressed support for benefit cuts. alarimer Jun 2016 #58
oh look, more rightwing bullshit Skittles Jun 2016 #33
Right-wing bullshit from a fan of the right wing of the Democratic Party. Scuba Jun 2016 #40
Are we used to it yet? OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #54
The proper response is "thank you sir (or maam), may I have another." Scuba Jun 2016 #63
I am SICK of these fucking trolls Skittles Jun 2016 #67
No, the government stole from Peter to pay Paul. FICA programs are Peter. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #53
The trust fund is out, and has been Because dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #15
In Vietnam.... lastlib Jun 2016 #28
I will be happy to keep paying. drray23 Jun 2016 #26
Same here. While I'll notice it, I have no problem doing my fair share. Just don't piss it on MIC. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #27
maybe you could pony up a DU donation Skittles Jun 2016 #34
i do. i donate every month to DU.nt. drray23 Jun 2016 #61
Bless your heart forever! raging moderate Jun 2016 #49
Yay! It's good to know that not all Hillary supporters are DINOs. KPN Jun 2016 #59
The Medicare FICA deductions fund only Part A - Hospital Insurance progree Jun 2016 #39
Which is why we need single payer. It's all do-able. KPN Jun 2016 #60
Republican talking points from a DU member?? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #42
Don't ask. It is forbidden to speak of it. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #55
Excellent!!! And vote the Turtle out of office! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #5
Which is it Mitch? Imma-gonna-say... LYING FailureToCommunicate Jun 2016 #8
The Panama Papers felix_numinous Jun 2016 #9
That's right... ReRe Jun 2016 #35
Word! libodem Jun 2016 #10
How would Kentucky's economy do with a loss of Downwinder Jun 2016 #11
that is the national total. KY is 1,081,642 per month yellowdogintexas Jun 2016 #56
Thanks for the correction. Downwinder Jun 2016 #57
this was reagan era/greenspan FUCKUP to 'fix' the baby boomer bust for SS. pansypoo53219 Jun 2016 #17
Workers had their SS contribution were raised after that.. whathehell Jun 2016 #46
Raise the minimum wage to 15 dollars Poincare Jun 2016 #18
Get our Living Wage Jobs back into this country. -none Jun 2016 #47
"The NSA...........the only part of government that actually listens." Equinox Moon Jun 2016 #19
By borrowing from SS, they've made it part of debt. George Eliot Jun 2016 #20
What you call borrowing, I call stealing. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2016 #25
There's so much about the timing of all this . . . conspiracy? George Eliot Jun 2016 #68
That's what repukes do, shell game economics wordpix Jun 2016 #45
Don't you think this started with the DLC? Rubin was Clinton's guy. Or George Eliot Jun 2016 #69
Medicare is not 100% funded by FICA taxes. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #21
Really? Educate us! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #43
Approximately 41% of total Medicare spending comes from general revenue... PoliticAverse Jun 2016 #44
He supports a racist and a bigot, fraud and on top of that a white nationalist-------------- turbinetree Jun 2016 #22
Great post malaise Jun 2016 #23
Yertle's response: Marie Marie Jun 2016 #29
Thank you, thank you, thank you ... Jopin Klobe Jun 2016 #30
You know what I think of when I hear "entitlements?" ReRe Jun 2016 #36
I just can't believe that lie is still being told… midnight Jun 2016 #31
They have plenty to do with the national debt. Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #32
I guess it is how you look at things. There are no "excess" FICA taxes. mikehiggins Jun 2016 #37
It boils down to trust Cordy Jun 2016 #38
Social Security, a 20% problem Arizona Roadrunner Jun 2016 #41
A more viable and permanent solution is to get our Living Wage Jobs back into this country. -none Jun 2016 #48
K&R avaistheone1 Jun 2016 #50

erlewyne

(1,115 posts)
24. Mitch is right.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:11 PM
Jun 2016

To him the national debt is a good thing. It is part of
the GOP platform. Medicare and Social Security work.
He wants that money! Get rid of them.

 

Akamai

(1,779 posts)
51. Also, the Republicans want to poison any cooperation they can't
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:09 AM
Jun 2016

control and take a profit from.

raging moderate

(4,297 posts)
2. I suspect Republicons plan to convert FICA to a plain tax on lower-income workers.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:29 PM
Jun 2016

After all, "payroll taxes" sound so innocent. It's just another "payroll tax," don't worry your pretty little heads about how we all-wise Overlords spend the money.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
3. well they are actually the dumb ones
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jun 2016

The Social Security trust fund runs out in 2035. Medicare is in even worse shape.

What happens when FICA deductions are unable to cover the Medicare and Social Security benefits?

raging moderate

(4,297 posts)
4. Scrap the cap.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jun 2016

I speak as somebody who does not draw any Social Security benefits, despite having paid a lot of money into it.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
7. well
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 02:44 PM
Jun 2016

the statement claims that these are "100% funded by FICA". Not true. They are massively underfunded.

wolfie001

(2,227 posts)
12. Social Security does NOT run out in 2035!!! Get your basic facts straight.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 03:56 PM
Jun 2016

After all, aren't we Democrats? It can still pay 75% of the benefit at that time ad infinitum. Remove the cap on the high incomes and that will solve the balance. Poor rich people will have to contribute. Boo fucking hoo.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
13. Even better...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 03:59 PM
Jun 2016

how about the government return the monies it stole(borrowed) from the system, with interest?

64. Senator Sanders
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jun 2016

Thank you freebrew. Social Security is not part of the budget. Suggest you watch online amazing PBS "The Roosevelts" where FDR states he did not want Congress to ever get their hands on SS Fund. Reagan was told by Greenspan that he could transfer funds from SS Trust Fund to ths General Fund.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
66. I used to know the history better...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jun 2016

there are many that know more than me. I do remember the fight put up.
MANY Dems voted to misappropriate SS funds. I believe it was the 60s(?) maybe the 80s, maybe both...
Dems held both houses and yet this anti-democratic move was made with their help.

Taking monies from SS directly because there was SO MUCH $$ TO BE HAD.
The Rs bamboozled the system somehow getting this shit through.
As usual, the Dems had enough turncoats.

A little OT, why am I paying Medicare premiums when I paid for it all my working life?

Just askin'.

deist99

(122 posts)
52. Agree
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jun 2016

But not only remove the cap but also put a cap on maximum amount of benefits allowed. I would also have a minimum amount, my grandmother was living off of a paltry $780 in the early 2000. I would set the minimum amount at $1200 dollars a month and the max at three times that.
As far as Medicare goes I would propose a Medicare tariff on all imported goods to make up that diffierence.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
58. Her candidate has expressed support for benefit cuts.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:33 AM
Jun 2016

Raising the age at which you can draw SS IS a benefit cut. So I'm not surprised that the poster expressed the Grand Bargain (Catfood Commission) talking points.

Mark my words, the Republicans will fail to cut SS and Medicare (because they promise a lot but never deliver) but the Democrats WILL, because they (including Hillary) pretend to be progressive to get elected, then govern like old-school Republicans.

The only thing wrong with SS is the cap. Raise that and you will have eliminated most of the issues around it. Medicare requires more, but, since every retiree uses it, regardless of income, perhaps instead of a straight 1% payroll tax, it should be a progressive rate. I don't know.

But these are only problems because we refuse to spend the money to fix it and we spend far, far too much on the military.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
15. The trust fund is out, and has been Because
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jun 2016

the Gov't spent it, even tho they were not supposed to count it as part of the budget.
They they put IOUs in the fund, in the form of Treasury notes...

the reason they do not want to have Soc. Sec. anymore is they want to spend billions on weapons, not people.

there IS enough money in the coffers.
The issue is, who gets it?

lastlib

(23,213 posts)
28. In Vietnam....
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jun 2016

we "had to destroy the village in order to save it." Now, the GOP wants to SAVE Social Security in order to DESTROY it.

The people who want to privatize Social Security are mainly the Wall Street vultures who want to get their grubby hands on the money, and the GOP does their bidding. Imagine if we had followed their plan under GWB before 2008--what would've happened to all of our retirement plans in the Bush crash? Many of us never would recover from that, but the Wall Street vultures would've walked out happy with their fortune in fees for taking our retirement $$ for a ride in the toilet.

drray23

(7,627 posts)
26. I will be happy to keep paying.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:40 PM
Jun 2016

I am fortunate enough to make more than the cap. so I pay zero above that. if the cap is lifted it will solve that issue and people like me or richer won't even notice the slight difference.

progree

(10,901 posts)
39. The Medicare FICA deductions fund only Part A - Hospital Insurance
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 06:16 AM
Jun 2016

Medicare Part B and Part D are funded 25% by premiums and copays, and 75% by general revenues.


felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
9. The Panama Papers
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 03:32 PM
Jun 2016

ended that excuse forever, that there are not enough funds.

Money never disappears--it only changes hands.

yellowdogintexas

(22,250 posts)
56. that is the national total. KY is 1,081,642 per month
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:10 AM
Jun 2016

the line quoted in you post is all areas of the US. Kentucky totals are right below that. 1,081,642 per month.

Which makes more sense, considering the relatively small population of KY

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
57. Thanks for the correction.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 11:26 AM
Jun 2016

I have trouble with those big numbers.
Total monthly benefits (thousands of dollars)

$1,081,642,000 per month

pansypoo53219

(20,969 posts)
17. this was reagan era/greenspan FUCKUP to 'fix' the baby boomer bust for SS.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 04:35 PM
Jun 2016

greenspan fucked up tho w/ the lowass cap. no INDEXING of the cap.we need to LIFT the cap or raise it. greenspud left a time bomb.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
46. Workers had their SS contribution were raised after that..
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:13 AM
Jun 2016

I'm not sure that the cap was lower before that...It may ha e been, I don't know..I do know that we, those making under $100+, were paying more out of their paychecks.

Poincare

(11 posts)
18. Raise the minimum wage to 15 dollars
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 04:55 PM
Jun 2016

Would double the amount of FICA taxes collected at the low end of the wage scale. That should add 10 to 15 years of solvency. But, most of these projections are relying on static conditions( inflation, median wage,..) and anything that delivers a result beyond 5 years is just a guess. Unless we create a paper bank, who employs all senior citizens, then Congress will find the money quick.

-none

(1,884 posts)
47. Get our Living Wage Jobs back into this country.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:13 AM
Jun 2016

That is the real reason there is a problem with Social Security. Too many of our Living Wage Jobs have left the country.

George Eliot

(701 posts)
20. By borrowing from SS, they've made it part of debt.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 05:06 PM
Jun 2016

You are right, of course. It should not be part of the debt. Same is true of how pensions were included in business assets and then zeroed out in bankruptcy. Pensions were fully paid and never considered assets of corporations until simple little laws were changed. How convenient. Just move money from one account to another. And whamo, it becomes an asset for the rich. The thing about McConnell is he obstructs everything for the rest of us that he gets for Kentucky. I read a lengthy article on him and he brings home the bacon including health care for his own which keeps him in office. But he denies same for the rest of us.

it is our lawmakers that makes this corruption possible.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
25. What you call borrowing, I call stealing.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:35 PM
Jun 2016

And I am sure you also noticed that after they made it mandatory for employees to contribute to pension funds, and illegal to get ahold of the money for years,
that suddenly we had a giant crash of the banks holding the money, just as the us boomers were getting ready to cash it out for our retirement.

Now there is talk of the Gov. creating another fun retirement plan for workers.

George Eliot

(701 posts)
68. There's so much about the timing of all this . . . conspiracy?
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jun 2016

I'm not a conspiracy nut but on the other hand, timing is all. And the timing sure did benefit all those financial institutions. And yet all those people who owned that money are left helpless and we're voting back in all the same people who did it to us the first time. How do you explain that?

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
45. That's what repukes do, shell game economics
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 08:57 AM
Jun 2016

I'm incolved in local politics in a red town in a blue state. Never ceases to amaze me how many shell games go on.

George Eliot

(701 posts)
69. Don't you think this started with the DLC? Rubin was Clinton's guy. Or
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jun 2016

Or was Clinton Rubin's guy? We have one party now with two labels. That's the problem.

turbinetree

(24,695 posts)
22. He supports a racist and a bigot, fraud and on top of that a white nationalist--------------
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 05:43 PM
Jun 2016

so when you present him with "stuff" and a set of questions, he blames the working class stiffs in this country who are trying to have a job, get a job, to pay for there later years, thanks from those like Francis Perkins, and hoping that there social retirement isn't given to the same hucksters on Wall Street who want to make a buck off my social security and keeping you in power.

We are not into scams there Mitchie turtle lips, we do know how to add 1+1 = 2 and not 2+2=5, or is this beyond your right wing comprehension, its not past ours, we took the civic class.

Honk------------------for a political revolution



Jopin Klobe

(779 posts)
30. Thank you, thank you, thank you ...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jun 2016

... this has been stated weakly over the years ...

... it needs to be shouted over and over and over and over again ...

... "Entitlements* have nothing to do with the national debt!" ...

... now, tend to your wife's father's Asian shipping company's interests in regard to the stinking TPP, TIPP, TPTPTPT, whatever ...


*and, Yes, we're freaking ENTITLED to this money, you God damned tax evaders ...

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
36. You know what I think of when I hear "entitlements?"
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 01:32 AM
Jun 2016

I think of all the Corporate Welfare that's handed out on an annual basis to American Corporations. All the loopholes that have been created and sneaked into the back of innocent-sounding Bills by the Corporation's Congressional crony pals.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
32. They have plenty to do with the national debt.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jun 2016

Because all of the excess of the FICA taxes over the amount spent on the programs over the years has been spent by the government on other stuff. The "trust fund" is an accounting fiction; there is no real money in the "trust fund" and economically, the situation is exactly the same as if they were funded as part of the general budget.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
37. I guess it is how you look at things. There are no "excess" FICA taxes.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 02:24 AM
Jun 2016

There may be more taken in than is needed in any particular year but all of that money is collected and intended for use in the future years when the number of retired Americans goes up. That was the rationale for increasing the tax years ago, not to generate money to pay for wars that were never declared, and so forth.

I remember when the media and "learned" spokespeople mocked Al Gore over the concept of a locked box for FICA receipts. Instead the government was able to issue "bonds" for the money they used, the same bonds they now want to renege on because paying them back would increase the debt.

Cordy

(82 posts)
38. It boils down to trust
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 03:55 AM
Jun 2016

It seems to me the people we can't trust with our SS, are the people who have it. So the first thing to be done is get it out of their hands some how. Maybe an Amendment to the Bill of Rights, thou shall not tamper with SS funding, or spend eternity in Prison.

 

Arizona Roadrunner

(168 posts)
41. Social Security, a 20% problem
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 07:53 AM
Jun 2016

Social Security is an insurance program. You don't ask how much you earn in order to determine if you collect on an insurance claim. Also, even if the trust fund is or goes broke, people will get 75% to 80% of their benefits due to people paying in each year. All you have to do is remove or adjust the cap subject to FICA higher to make up for the 20% problem. Therefore, anytime people are saying Social Security will go broke, they are either uninformed, ill-informed, or a propagandist for some cause.

-none

(1,884 posts)
48. A more viable and permanent solution is to get our Living Wage Jobs back into this country.
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 09:26 AM
Jun 2016

That is the real problem in the first place. Raising the cap without getting our Living Wage manufacturing jobs back into this country is only diddling with the symptoms.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Occupy Democrats came up...