Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jtx

(68 posts)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 02:58 PM Jun 2016

No Fly Lists - ACLU Statement

Since this subject keeps popping up in several threads.

Here is the ACLU’s statement from when this was discussed last fall:

" the standards for inclusion on the No Fly List are unconstitutionally vague, and innocent people are blacklisted without a fair process to correct government error. Our lawsuit seeks a meaningful opportunity for our clients to challenge their placement on the No Fly List because it is so error-prone and the consequences for their lives have been devastating."


https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/until-no-fly-list-fixed-it-shouldnt-be-used-restrict-peoples-freedoms

LA Times editorial in opposition.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-terrorist-watch-list-20151207-story.html


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. I agree that the no-fly list is often arbitrary, but...
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jun 2016

if we are comfortable with arbitrary reasons to stop someone from flying to see Aunt Belle, why are we so uncomfortable with arbitrarily stopping someone from buying a machine which has as its only purpose killing-- perhaps even killing Aunt Belle?

NickB79

(20,278 posts)
3. "We" should NOT be comfortable with such a list
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:20 PM
Jun 2016

And the ACLU is right: it's a massive invasion of our civil liberties that no progressives should support.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
4. Yes, it is. But it is there while there is no "no kill" list...
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jun 2016

meaning that once again we have completely screwed things up.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
5. One is an enumerated right and the other is travel on a private carrier?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jun 2016


(fyi, I don't care for the nature of these lists for *any* removal of rights.)
 

jtx

(68 posts)
2. Secret Lists are not ok to restrict the right of travel.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jun 2016

It is not OK for that or any other purpose.

The government should not be using secret lists to restrict the right to travel, which is what the suit is about.

What comes after that - secret detention based on the list without indictment or conviction?

This is a huge step into the abyss of a police state.

Read both of the links for thoughtful discussion.

madinmaryland

(65,690 posts)
6. Put Wayne LaPierre on the No Fly List. He is a clear and present danger to society.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jun 2016

Wouldn't it be ironic if he was put on the list. Not able to buy a gun.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No Fly Lists - ACLU State...