Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:50 PM
PlanetaryOrbit (155 posts)
Women may soon be required to register for Selective Service. How do you feel?
The Senate just passed a $602 billion defense spending bill. In it, among other things, is a requirement for women to register for Selective Service, just like men. The Senate bill still has to be reconciled with the House version, though. And if Obama vetoes it, the Senate may very well override the veto since it already had/has 85 votes in the Senate.
What are your thoughts on it? My thoughts are that this is going to be a highly unpopular move, but it's the fair thing to do. I do not agree with the societal attitude that if a man dies in combat, it is less tragic than if a woman dies in combat - which seems to be part of the attitude driving the notion that only men should be drafted and not women (society really does not consider all deaths to be equal). I think this is one of those "equality goes both ways" situations. At any rate, it's not like a military draft is going to be reinstated any time soon, so registering for Selective Service is simply going to entail filling out some unpopular paperwork.
|
84 replies, 7957 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
PlanetaryOrbit | Jun 2016 | OP |
obamanut2012 | Jun 2016 | #1 | |
csziggy | Jun 2016 | #3 | |
Hortensis | Jun 2016 | #10 | |
obamanut2012 | Jun 2016 | #26 | |
Hortensis | Jun 2016 | #27 | |
obamanut2012 | Jun 2016 | #62 | |
Starry Messenger | Jun 2016 | #14 | |
gollygee | Jun 2016 | #21 | |
obamanut2012 | Jun 2016 | #25 | |
JanMichael | Jun 2016 | #37 | |
bemildred | Jun 2016 | #48 | |
Iggo | Jun 2016 | #57 | |
scscholar | Jun 2016 | #58 | |
obamanut2012 | Jun 2016 | #61 | |
Calista241 | Jun 2016 | #68 | |
no_hypocrisy | Jun 2016 | #2 | |
ancianita | Jun 2016 | #4 | |
demmiblue | Jun 2016 | #7 | |
apcalc | Jun 2016 | #19 | |
smirkymonkey | Jun 2016 | #30 | |
MerryBlooms | Jun 2016 | #33 | |
appalachiablue | Jun 2016 | #53 | |
rainy | Jun 2016 | #5 | |
JustinL | Jun 2016 | #43 | |
PlanetaryOrbit | Jun 2016 | #50 | |
mahina | Jun 2016 | #6 | |
Hortensis | Jun 2016 | #12 | |
Just reading posts | Jun 2016 | #29 | |
Hortensis | Jun 2016 | #34 | |
Just reading posts | Jun 2016 | #36 | |
snooper2 | Jun 2016 | #67 | |
JustinL | Jun 2016 | #44 | |
Hortensis | Jun 2016 | #46 | |
LanternWaste | Jun 2016 | #70 | |
-none | Jun 2016 | #8 | |
Just reading posts | Jun 2016 | #9 | |
Basic LA | Jun 2016 | #22 | |
jberryhill | Jun 2016 | #11 | |
pnwmom | Jun 2016 | #13 | |
KamaAina | Jun 2016 | #15 | |
JennyMominFL | Jun 2016 | #16 | |
HereSince1628 | Jun 2016 | #17 | |
apcalc | Jun 2016 | #18 | |
auntpurl | Jun 2016 | #20 | |
valerief | Jun 2016 | #23 | |
hunter | Jun 2016 | #24 | |
davidn3600 | Jun 2016 | #28 | |
smirkymonkey | Jun 2016 | #31 | |
davidn3600 | Jun 2016 | #39 | |
REP | Jun 2016 | #32 | |
LeftRant | Jun 2016 | #35 | |
catnhatnh | Jun 2016 | #38 | |
PlanetaryOrbit | Jun 2016 | #40 | |
uppityperson | Jun 2016 | #41 | |
JonLeibowitz | Jun 2016 | #79 | |
JustinL | Jun 2016 | #42 | |
treestar | Jun 2016 | #45 | |
struggle4progress | Jun 2016 | #47 | |
Zing Zing Zingbah | Jun 2016 | #49 | |
tonyt53 | Jun 2016 | #51 | |
Agnosticsherbet | Jun 2016 | #52 | |
libodem | Jun 2016 | #54 | |
Jester Messiah | Jun 2016 | #55 | |
notadmblnd | Jun 2016 | #56 | |
Peace Patriot | Jun 2016 | #59 | |
Warren DeMontague | Jun 2016 | #60 | |
PlanetaryOrbit | Jun 2016 | #63 | |
Downtown Hound | Jun 2016 | #64 | |
LWolf | Jun 2016 | #65 | |
bigwillq | Jun 2016 | #66 | |
Stellar | Jun 2016 | #69 | |
JonLeibowitz | Jun 2016 | #80 | |
Stellar | Jun 2016 | #81 | |
frogmarch | Jun 2016 | #71 | |
RAFisher | Jun 2016 | #72 | |
lunatica | Jun 2016 | #73 | |
bonemachine | Jun 2016 | #74 | |
OldHippieChick | Jun 2016 | #75 | |
peace13 | Jun 2016 | #76 | |
Agnosticsherbet | Jun 2016 | #77 | |
shenmue | Jun 2016 | #78 | |
Vinca | Jun 2016 | #82 | |
Skittles | Jun 2016 | #83 | |
lumberjack_jeff | Jun 2016 | #84 |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:52 PM
obamanut2012 (24,240 posts)
1. Pass an ERA, and I'm 100% for it
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:54 PM
csziggy (33,888 posts)
3. ^^^THIS^^^
If women have all the obligations as men we should be assured we have all the rights that men have.
|
Response to csziggy (Reply #3)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:04 PM
Hortensis (56,782 posts)
10. Pass this and the ERA will be that much more doable.
Want equal rights, shoulder equal responsibilities.
Have equal responsibilities, no excuse to deny equal rights. |
Response to Hortensis (Reply #10)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:18 PM
obamanut2012 (24,240 posts)
26. Nope, give us the rights first, or they will never come
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #26)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:22 PM
Hortensis (56,782 posts)
27. "Give?" "Come?" Since "they" gave us the vote,
a long time ago now, we can do far better for ourselves than sit around waiting for things to be given to us and to come along. Just imo.
|
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:10 PM
Starry Messenger (32,336 posts)
14. Same.
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:32 PM
gollygee (22,336 posts)
21. That and deal with the rape epidemic in the US military
Agreed.
|
Response to gollygee (Reply #21)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:17 PM
obamanut2012 (24,240 posts)
25. Yes, cosign
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:44 PM
JanMichael (24,507 posts)
37. Ding! We have a winner! nt
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #1)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:44 PM
scscholar (2,902 posts)
58. Really? You support the Republican's War on Women? (ntxt)
Response to scscholar (Reply #58)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:39 PM
obamanut2012 (24,240 posts)
61. lolz you guys!
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #1)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 03:10 PM
Calista241 (5,483 posts)
68. Agreed. If you get all the benefits of our society, you should have to pay for it like everyone.
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:53 PM
no_hypocrisy (42,672 posts)
2. One of two things:
A) It might discourage a capricious vote by Congress to enact a draft for war, or
B) We may continue having unitary engagements without the votes of Congress indefinitely because the draft would be so unpopular. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:54 PM
ancianita (31,925 posts)
4. This will NEVER be fair to women until all reported rapes are prosecuted by civilian law. A woman
should never have to fight both an enemy in front of her and one in back of her who's supposed to actually protect her as he would any brother-in-arms. There is no harassment or rape that ever -- ever -- should be endured for any alleged greater good.
If you don't protect your female military, you don't get to draft them. My vote is no until the DoD has restructured all justice processes for military rape. No fucking exceptions. |
Response to ancianita (Reply #4)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:31 PM
apcalc (4,381 posts)
19. Good and important point!
Response to ancianita (Reply #4)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:14 PM
smirkymonkey (63,221 posts)
30. +1000
This and No ERA, no draft for women. Both those conditions MUST be met before women can be forced to register.
|
Response to ancianita (Reply #4)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:27 PM
MerryBlooms (11,317 posts)
33. Rec. Well stated.
![]() |
Response to ancianita (Reply #4)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:27 PM
appalachiablue (38,722 posts)
53. +5. Also equal pay for US women enforced across the board or else severely penalized.
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:58 PM
rainy (5,982 posts)
5. I say that when women make up at least half of the war deciding body of our government then women
can register.
|
Response to rainy (Reply #5)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:49 AM
JustinL (722 posts)
43. does that apply to other groups as well?
Shouldn't nonwhite and nonreligious people also be exempt since they're also underrepresented in Congress? For that matter, what about young people?
FWIW, I believe the draft should be eliminated entirely. |
Response to rainy (Reply #5)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:20 PM
PlanetaryOrbit (155 posts)
50. Like JustinL said.........
What about every racial minority in America?
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:59 PM
mahina (16,208 posts)
6. I agree it's the fair thing to do, and also think it will make more people pay attention
Both to politics and international affairs, as well.
It should increase voter turnout too, this go round at least, as young women become aware that this is on the horizon. |
Response to mahina (Reply #6)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:06 PM
Hortensis (56,782 posts)
12. Right. Personally, I think the draft should
extend right through the 40s or so. THAT would make more people pay attention.
|
Response to Hortensis (Reply #12)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:13 PM
Just reading posts (688 posts)
29. You want 45 year old Americans to be pulled from their jobs and sent into military service?
Um....really?
|
Response to Just reading posts (Reply #29)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:34 PM
Hortensis (56,782 posts)
34. Really. It'd pretty much mean the end
to unnecessary, for-profit wars, don't you think? I also feel that mature adults are exactly the ones who should be going to war, instead of sending their kids. I won't be holding my breath waiting for a national wave of proud responsibility, though.
|
Response to Hortensis (Reply #34)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:36 PM
Just reading posts (688 posts)
36. Why not just draft 80 year old great grandmothers while you're at it?
I won't be holding my breath waiting for a national wave of proud responsibility, though.
I hope not, since your proposal hasn't the slightest chance of ever being put into effect. |
Response to Just reading posts (Reply #36)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 01:41 PM
snooper2 (30,151 posts)
67. are you saying 80 year old great grandmothers couldn't contribute to a war effort?
Isn't that ageism!
|
Response to Hortensis (Reply #34)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:51 AM
JustinL (722 posts)
44. and what about those who are killed and maimed while we're waiting for the end of war?
Are they just unwilling martyrs to the cause?
|
Response to JustinL (Reply #44)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 04:31 AM
Hortensis (56,782 posts)
46. You seem to have less faith in the willingness
of people to just say no when it's their own comfort and economic wellbeing on the line, JustinL. I'm pretty sure that, short of the equivalent of another bombing of Pearl Harbor and threats invasion across both oceans, using a draft that could hit anyone any time during a quarter century of their adulthood would be bad for a party at reelection.
I imagine the citizenry might even have a whole new viewpoint about the desirability of protecting Middle East or Asian oil pipelines in 115 degree temperatures versus putting sustainable energy programs in high gear right here at home. Just for one for-instance. I must say I'm a little disappointed at all this resistance to even an unrealistic air-dream of sharing responsibility and sacrifice. '"Give" me the Equal Rights Amendment and then maybe I'll consider whether I'm interested in shouldering the equal responsibilities that should come with it.' 'Our kids can go to war and all we'll do is grumble that war is evil or wave flags, but don't even think we'd go instead.' Just maybe if it were older women voters who were being raped we'd scream bloody murder legally, make lousier victims than our daughters? What would our husbands have to say about it? Would people who've grown relatively educated and prosperous in maturity see institutionalized victimization as appropriate for them? |
Response to Just reading posts (Reply #29)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 03:34 PM
LanternWaste (37,748 posts)
70. As recently as 2011, the army allowed anyone up to the age of 42 years old to enlist
As recently as 2011, the army allowed anyone up to the age of 42 years old to enlist and complete basic training.
![]() |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:01 PM
-none (1,884 posts)
8. Oh, hell no.
Never mind both my daughters are in their 30's and not subject to the draft.
A better plan is to stop our corporate wars of choice, then we would not need a possible draft. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:03 PM
Just reading posts (688 posts)
9. I'm against the Draft. Not a fan of involuntary servitude.
Response to Just reading posts (Reply #9)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:35 PM
Basic LA (833 posts)
22. You & me both !
I'm against the draft. (I speak as a Vietnam vet.) I'm even against jury duty, except for DU.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:04 PM
jberryhill (62,444 posts)
11. It only makes sense
Putting aside the whole issue of whether ANYONE should have to register, I don't see why only men should. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:09 PM
pnwmom (107,970 posts)
13. It's not fair till we pass the Equal Rights Amendment.
The main excuses for not passing it before were gay marriage and women being drafted. If they want to draft women, the ERA needs to get passed first.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:20 PM
KamaAina (78,249 posts)
15. "Me And Julia Down By The Schoolyard"
a potential remake of the Paul Simon classic.
![]() |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:26 PM
JennyMominFL (218 posts)
16. Get rid of it
I think it's fair for all Americans to register. However, as someone who served in the Miltary, I would rather have someone serving next to me because they choose to rather than being forced to. I'd rather just get rid of it completely. and I agree with the poster above who said we should pass the ERA first
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:30 PM
HereSince1628 (36,063 posts)
17. I'm not a fan of conscription. I'd have many concerns with women actually being drafted
I'd want to be sure that the differences in assignment to modes of service wouldn't be unreasonably sex-biased.
Making conscription acceptable to congress critters could create a real mess of gender bias |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:30 PM
apcalc (4,381 posts)
18. Pass the ERA
Then it would be fine.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 05:39 PM
valerief (53,235 posts)
23. I see an increase in pregnancies if there's a draft. Cuz war shit sucks and only benefits
WAR PROFITEERS.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:02 PM
hunter (36,975 posts)
24. I think this Selective Service registration is bizarre.
The Vietnam war ended before I was draft age and I also missed this registration crap. Registered or not, Uncle Sam knows who you are.
My mom's family are pacifists. That's how most of her ancestors ended up in the U.S.A.. They escaped the U.S. Civil War too. Both my dad and his dad served in the military. My grandpa was an Army Air Force officer in World War II. He didn't fly; they decided he was more valuable on the ground. After the war he was an aerospace engineer and worked on the Apollo Project making some especially difficult bits of metal. If I was asked to fight an unjust war I'd walk away. If my kids were asked, and they chose not to fight, I'd find a way that they could walk away. My mom's dad was a conscientious objector in World War II. He was also a welder. They gave him a choice, prison or building and repairing ships for the Merchant Marine. He built ships. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:11 PM
davidn3600 (6,342 posts)
28. So we are going to have a female commander-in-chief...
....who will be just as war-hawkish as her white male predecessors. And women want to have no skin in the game?
I mean if you are going to have this system, then it should be for both genders. That is if you believe in equality and want combat jobs open to women. Otherwise, just scrap the whole damn thing. You can't just have equality only in the areas you want. It's ridiculous to scream for equal rights for an entire century but still expect men to go out and be the only ones forced to die for their country whether they agree with the war or not. |
Response to davidn3600 (Reply #28)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:17 PM
smirkymonkey (63,221 posts)
31. Yes, but we don't have equal rights yet.
So no draft until the ERA is passed.
|
Response to smirkymonkey (Reply #31)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:08 PM
davidn3600 (6,342 posts)
39. What would passing ERA magically do?
I'm all for it.
But I don't know what it would legally accomplish. Since it failed to pass in the 1980s, most states and the federal government have passed laws already that do what the ERA would have accomplished back then. So it has made it a bit redundant, legally speaking. Like I've said before, Democrats should have pushed for a full blown ERA back in 2009 instead of Lilly Ledbetter Act, which has turned out to have practically no effect. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:25 PM
REP (21,691 posts)
32. The exemption for women has been for breeding more soldiers, not sentiment
Women have traditionally been exempted from the battlefield simply because of the one-to-one ratio of woman to birth at a time, whereas a single male can impregnate many women within a short time period. So if the male population was decimated or even more severely reduced, the few remaining men could impregnate the ample supply of women to bring up the numbers of available cannon fodder.
Dress it up with some sentimental excuses, such as the delicate nature of the fairer sex or women might go insane on their periods and defect, but the true reason is that women have traditionally been reserved to serve in the trenches as breeding stock. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:36 PM
LeftRant (524 posts)
35. I think it's great. We'll have more discussions about our military use perhaps.
We already know they CAN serve. I think the furtherance of equality demands this
![]() |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:44 PM
catnhatnh (8,976 posts)
38. It wouldn't be fair???
What the hell kind of idiot thinks the draft has ever been fair to males??? And now filling out a fucking form is less fair to women then that part where males were actually killed half way around the world for years in Vietnam??? Equality? But filling out a sheet of paper is bullshit?
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:58 PM
PlanetaryOrbit (155 posts)
40. The penalty for men and women who don't register
Does anyone know if the main penalty for not registering for Selective Service, is that you cannot get FAFSA federal student financial aid?
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Reply #40)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 11:45 PM
uppityperson (115,527 posts)
41. That is true, and you can't get a drivers license either.
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Reply #40)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 05:21 PM
JonLeibowitz (6,282 posts)
79. Not just that: ineligibility for many federal and state government jobs.
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:35 AM
JustinL (722 posts)
42. I feel that the Selective Service should be abolished n/t
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 12:52 AM
treestar (81,509 posts)
45. Fine
That is perfectly ok and right. Any opposition I have torched raft is another issue
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 04:34 AM
struggle4progress (114,739 posts)
47. It means twice as much opposition to a draft
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 08:09 AM
Zing Zing Zingbah (6,496 posts)
49. I imagine a woman could get out of serving by getting pregnant
if ever called up to draft. The draft would be for women at prime ages for child bearing. I imagine attempting to draft women would result in a large baby boom in this country. Sure they can register, but I just don't think actually drafting them is going to work out so well.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:21 PM
tonyt53 (5,737 posts)
51. I'm fine with it. For the next war, I'd prefer we reinstate the draft with zero deferments.
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:26 PM
Agnosticsherbet (11,619 posts)
52. There is no reason women should be denied the requirement to sign up for selective service.
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:29 PM
libodem (19,288 posts)
54. All the responsibility
None of the perks. That was a big issue when we tried to ratify the ERA.
Maybe this issue eill help make us equal to that one fucking rib from Adam? Signed Paying For It Ever Since ![]() |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jester Messiah (4,711 posts)
55. It seems overdue.
Equality means equality.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 05:35 PM
notadmblnd (23,720 posts)
56. It means nothing, just like males registering for SS currently means nothing
Currently we have an all volunteer military not a draft so registering for the draft is kinda meaningless.
Now what they should do is require all young people to serve in the military, no exceptions. Religious get no breaks, college students get no breaks, rich get no breaks. Everyone has skin in the game. I could almost guarantee our leaders wouldn't be so quick to lob bombs when they determine they want to loot other countries of their resources if they have to risk losing their offspring for $$s |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 06:57 PM
Peace Patriot (24,010 posts)
59. I'm totally favor of women being able to kill for Exxon Mobil!
Especially after TPP gets shoved down our throats, and automation then cuts our throats, and the last of our working class jobs disappear, what are people gonna do to make a living, huh? Women will need to be equal opportunity killers to have any income at all, and, hey, I hear the health care is terrific and it's included in the package if you survive the oil wars and need prosthetic devices or whatever.
Yes! Draft women! It's only fair! I considered using ![]() Positive statement: Feminism is, and always has been, about peace and social justice--NOT about war, and especially not about UNJUST war to make the uber-rich uber-richer! Peace ![]() |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 07:07 PM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
60. I think it's right.
Particularly if gender is really a meaningless fiction, or whatever. I don't know how anyone can justify handling it an other way. How are we supposed to approach 18 year olds who identify as non gender binary, etc?
Only fair way to handle it is, everyone registers. But really we should do away with the whole thing. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 12:08 PM
PlanetaryOrbit (155 posts)
63. When the House and Senate reconcile the different bill versions
Is the House typically more likely to cave in to the Senate, or vice versa?
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 12:36 PM
Downtown Hound (12,618 posts)
64. I think Selective Service is a con job and always has been
If we ever needed a draft again, we could easily come up with one without wasting millions of dollars a year during peacetime on a bullshit bureaucracy that serves no purpose.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 01:23 PM
LWolf (46,179 posts)
65. Fair? I suppose. Right? No way in hell.
I support equal rights. I support treating genders equally.
I strongly oppose the Selective Service System in total. This shouldn't be unpopular due to gender. It should be unpopular because it's a move in the wrong direction. It's doubling the number that are mandated to register, from 50% to 100%. Instead, the Selective Service should be abolished. That 50% should be dropped to 0%. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 01:37 PM
bigwillq (72,790 posts)
66. Fine by me (nt)
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 03:28 PM
Stellar (5,644 posts)
69. Are they still being raped in the service?
Frontline |
Response to Stellar (Reply #69)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 05:23 PM
JonLeibowitz (6,282 posts)
80. Seems like both men and women were raped.
Response to JonLeibowitz (Reply #80)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 07:11 PM
Stellar (5,644 posts)
81. I know, and I remember reading that nothing is being done about it. nt
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 03:44 PM
frogmarch (12,092 posts)
71. Would the women be maids and waitresses at
military bases?
OK, what about pay? Would the women receive equal pay to the men's? |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 03:53 PM
RAFisher (466 posts)
72. Way overdue.
I remember in high school when I found out that only males could be drafted. It struck me as very old. As a male I didn't think it was fair, especially in this day and age when so much of warfare is with the Air Force and Navy. What, women can't fly a plane just as well as a man?
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 04:01 PM
lunatica (53,410 posts)
73. I say men shouldn't have to register for Selective Service
Let the politicians go themselves and not be allowed to even send their children. We'll see how many wars we start then.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 04:04 PM
bonemachine (757 posts)
74. Eliminate Selective Service
Period.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 04:50 PM
OldHippieChick (2,434 posts)
75. Okay, let's take this one step further
As much as I was against the draft during Viet Nam, now I say bring it back. Bring it back for men and women and no more "rich" guy deferments. These same folks who have had to make several return trips to Iraq and Afghanistan should get to share the glory w the sons and daughters of the well-to-do.
I predict we would stop all this endless war talk. People need to realize what is at stake. if it is their children, they might not be so rah-rah. |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 04:54 PM
peace13 (11,076 posts)
76. ERA and yes.
Both!
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 04:56 PM
Agnosticsherbet (11,619 posts)
77. I think women should be equal in all ways, including the annoying necessity of registering for the
Selective Service.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 05:04 PM
shenmue (38,410 posts)
78. I'm okay with it
![]() |
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 07:12 PM
Vinca (49,396 posts)
82. If men have to register, women have to register.
You can't cherry pick what parts of equality you like.
|
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 07:15 PM
Skittles (149,497 posts)
83. I served
Response to PlanetaryOrbit (Original post)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 07:27 PM
lumberjack_jeff (33,224 posts)
84. Not a lot of support for equality here... except for the presidency, of course.
There is something to be said of electing a commander in chief who controls the fate of lives they value as well as those they don't.
I think it's funny that people condition their support for the responsibilities of citizenship on passage of the ERA. Every single law that would be rendered unconstitutional by its passage were intended to help women. Now that women can serve in combat, the entire premise of Rotsker vs Goldberg is irrelevant. The male-only draft is unconstitutional and counterproductive. One of the primary reasons young men are poorly educated is because if they don't register to be drafted, they aren't allowed to apply for student aid. |