Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:18 PM Jun 2016

Judge on Stanford attacker's consent claims: "I take him at his word"

Ugh.

A recently-released transcript of the sentencing hearing for Brock Turner, the ex-Stanford swimmer convicted of sexually assaulting an unconscious woman, sheds new light on a judge's controversial decision to sentence Turner to six months in jail.

At the June 2 hearing, Turner's lawyer Mike Armstrong argued that Turner has admitted digitally penetrating the woman, but says that "in his drunken state, he remembered consent." In explaining his sentence, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky's appears to believe Turner is being truthful in that regard.

<snip>


http://www.cbsnews.com/news/brock-turner-ex-swimmer-judge-in-stanford-sex-assault-case-i-take-him-at-his-word/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge on Stanford attacker's consent claims: "I take him at his word" (Original Post) cali Jun 2016 OP
there are words--but they would get me banned. niyad Jun 2016 #1
Yeah, me too. cali Jun 2016 #3
"He told me he was innocent! What was I supposed to do? Not believe him?" Aristus Jun 2016 #2
believes the rapist, not the woman. geez, colour me soooooo not surprised. for a guy niyad Jun 2016 #5
The woman said nothing but that she didn't remember the attack. Igel Jun 2016 #8
Well, in CA if you're legally impaired, I think passed out applies in this case justiceischeap Jun 2016 #9
there is the medical evidence, for one thing. and, as was pointed out, if the woman was niyad Jun 2016 #10
but the 12 page letter of the woman means absolutely nothing to you, persky? niyad Jun 2016 #4
Classic confusion there, your honor gratuitous Jun 2016 #6
Yes. This is something many don't understand. trotsky Jun 2016 #17
This should be unbelievable. Unfortunately, there are (too many) more judges like Persky. Eugene Jun 2016 #7
makes me wonder. the man used to prosecute sexual assault cases. maybe somebody should niyad Jun 2016 #11
yeah. that I'd like to see. cali Jun 2016 #14
Does Judge Persky have a daughter we can introduce Brock to? WillowTree Jun 2016 #12
The two Swedish guys said the girl wasn't moving, how is the judge going to believe Turner over... uponit7771 Jun 2016 #13
I'm speechless. Odin2005 Jun 2016 #15
And why not? Really, what can one say to adequately express cali Jun 2016 #16
my comment to him is the benediction, "may you receive everything you deserve". niyad Jun 2016 #18
Grrr! This just enrages me! smirkymonkey Jun 2016 #19

Aristus

(66,266 posts)
2. "He told me he was innocent! What was I supposed to do? Not believe him?"
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:21 PM
Jun 2016

Really bad judgment, judge...

niyad

(112,974 posts)
5. believes the rapist, not the woman. geez, colour me soooooo not surprised. for a guy
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:26 PM
Jun 2016

who used to be a prosecutor specializing in sex crimes, one would think he would know better.

Igel

(35,268 posts)
8. The woman said nothing but that she didn't remember the attack.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:44 PM
Jun 2016

That's sort of a problem. It's not he-said/she-said.

It's he-said/ ... .

Even if the judge said, "Don't believe the kid" it wouldn't have much mattered, I suspect because there's no competing claim. Instead of, "I take him at his word," the judge would have said, "No basis for an opinion." Which leaves us ... where, exactly?

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
9. Well, in CA if you're legally impaired, I think passed out applies in this case
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 08:07 PM
Jun 2016

you can't give consent.

niyad

(112,974 posts)
10. there is the medical evidence, for one thing. and, as was pointed out, if the woman was
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jun 2016

unconscious (which is how the swedes found her) she was incapable of consent. PERIOD! I do not know why this is such a difficult concept for some to grasp.

niyad

(112,974 posts)
4. but the 12 page letter of the woman means absolutely nothing to you, persky?
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jun 2016

you are nothing more than a rape apologist, and I hope your days on the bench are coming to a close through recall. you are a disgrace.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Classic confusion there, your honor
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jun 2016

Of course you can take the defendant at his word that he "remembered consent." It's very convenient and self-serving for Mr. Turner to say so, but there's no reason to doubt that that's what Mr. Turner remembered. After all, even a judge can't read a person's mind.

The problem with Mr. Turner's remembrance, though, is that the woman he was in the process of raping wasn't conscious. It's really tough to get someone's consent in that state. That thing I just said about reading a person's mind? Yeah, it goes for the defendant, too. He can't read his victim's mind and claim there was consent when she wasn't competent to give consent because she was unconscious.

See how that works, your honor? It sounds like you were gulled, either by a devious defendant who is much smarter than you, or of your own volition.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
17. Yes. This is something many don't understand.
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:57 AM
Jun 2016

Consent isn't a one-time yes or no. It is an ongoing agreement for personal intimacy. If someone consents to sexual contact, THEY CAN CHANGE THEIR MIND AT ANY TIME! And if they're unconscious, that's a NO. Always. This should not be difficult!

Eugene

(61,791 posts)
7. This should be unbelievable. Unfortunately, there are (too many) more judges like Persky.
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:21 PM
Jun 2016

"I'll take him at his word" or "I'll give you the benefit of the doubt"
has been heard in many sex assault cases.

niyad

(112,974 posts)
11. makes me wonder. the man used to prosecute sexual assault cases. maybe somebody should
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 10:49 PM
Jun 2016

check those records.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
13. The two Swedish guys said the girl wasn't moving, how is the judge going to believe Turner over...
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 11:21 PM
Jun 2016

... two sober people?

Yeah, he should be recalled or impeached or some shit... he's a horrible

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
16. And why not? Really, what can one say to adequately express
Thu Jun 16, 2016, 09:21 AM
Jun 2016

one's outrage and disgust with this man?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge on Stanford attacke...