Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 09:56 AM Jun 2016

Republicans Should Worry About Losing the House - By Ramesh Ponnuru

Ramesh Ponnuru, a Bloomberg View columnist, is a senior editor for National Review, where he has covered national politics for more than 20 years, and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Republicans accept the conventional wisdom that Hillary Clinton is favored to win the presidency, and they know that her election would probably end their majority in the Senate. But in a year that has upended political expectations, they have clung to one comforting assumption: Their hold on the House is secure.

Their majority is protected by gerrymandering, the geographic distribution of Republican voters, the power of incumbency and its own sheer size. Republicans have 247 seats in the House, the most since 1931. Democrats would have to win 30 to take back the chamber. And that includes many seats in districts that usually go Republican in presidential contests. That sets the House apart from the Senate, where to keep their majority Republicans will have to hold seats in states that usually vote for Democratic presidential candidates.

But Clinton’s lead in the polls is widening to the point that Republicans need to set aside their complacency. Split-ticket voting has declined over the last generation. If Clinton wins big — because Republican voters stay home, or swing voters choose her party, or both — House Republicans will struggle to win re-election. Henry Olsen, the co-author of a recent book about the Republican party, tells me that an eight-point win would put Republicans in the danger zone.

Now it may be that the decline of split-ticket voting is another pattern this year will disrupt. Maybe voters will distinguish between Donald Trump and other Republicans, rejecting him but not them. Maybe Republican voters will come to the polls to vote for a third-party presidential candidate, such as Libertarian Gary Johnson, and then vote for Republican congressmen while they are there.

-snip-

http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-06-17/republicans-should-worry-about-losing-the-house
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans Should Worry About Losing the House - By Ramesh Ponnuru (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2016 OP
They should be edhopper Jun 2016 #1
I totally agree gopiscrap Jun 2016 #2
I'm sitting here watching my news feed, and it's still running 9 to 1 Trump stories. bemildred Jun 2016 #3
I think the 2010 Reich Wing designed gerrymandered districts makes it impossible. kairos12 Jun 2016 #4
I hope this is a harbinger of good news. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #5

edhopper

(33,432 posts)
1. They should be
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Jun 2016

Every Dem running should make their opponent defend Trump.
Trump will also keep a lot of GOP voters home.
It is still a long shot, but not out of the question.

I think the Senate is a sure bet.

gopiscrap

(23,724 posts)
2. I totally agree
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jun 2016

The same sort of shit bag repuke that would vote for Trump would vote for this repuke congress person...tar them all with the same brush

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
3. I'm sitting here watching my news feed, and it's still running 9 to 1 Trump stories.
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:25 AM
Jun 2016

All about what Trump said, or fending off Trump, or Trump's campaign, or Trump's VP pick, etc.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans Should Worry ...