Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NutmegYankee

(16,478 posts)
2. Like property, it's a right to own.
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 05:33 AM
Jun 2016

Whether someone has the means to buy property is another matter. And has been an issue since day one.

 

Night Watchman

(743 posts)
5. "Own"?
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 06:02 AM
Jun 2016

That word is not in the Second Amendment: "Keep" and "Bear" are. That could easily be viewed as a way for Revolutionary War veterans to hang on to the weapons they used.

NutmegYankee

(16,478 posts)
8. It falls under keep, which means own and possess.
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 06:19 AM
Jun 2016

It's the primary definition of the word: have or retain possession of.

If you keep chickens, you own them as property for instance.


As an interesting note, the right to own property also isn't in the Constitution, though it is protected by the 9th Amendment. The only stuff about property are limitations on the Government taking it (like 5th, 14th).

 

DetlefK

(16,670 posts)
3. Your premise is wrong. Otherwise many other things would have to be free as well.
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 05:52 AM
Jun 2016

Food, housing/clothing, medical care... And this would reduce the number of acceptable societies to socialist ones.

Self-defense is an inherent right. The 2nd Amendment is a cruel fuck-up by the Founding Fathers by tying self-defense to the ownership of a particular object AND by tying that private ownership to public interest.

 

DetlefK

(16,670 posts)
7. Because they give too much preference to the public over the individual.
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 06:13 AM
Jun 2016

Take a look at actual socialist societies:
Communist countries? They turned into oligarchies and created economic havoc by putting the production of the public over the needs of the individuals.
How about Libya? At face-value it was a just regime, but in practice the will of political minorities was rendered meaningless and Gaddafi was able to rule by demagoguery.

A little bit of socialism is good, but full socialism is a horrible, horrible idea.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
6. For the same reason you can publish a newspaper, but they don't buy you a printing press
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 06:04 AM
Jun 2016

Or you can have a religion, but they don't buy you a bible and church.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
10. Maybe you're right, maybe uncle sam should provide each of us a M4 for civil defense.
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 07:00 AM
Jun 2016

My EDCs on the other hand don't have anything to do with the 2A, but instead help assure me ability to defend myself. After all you have to be alive before anything else matters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Guns are Such a Gawd-G...