Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,894 posts)
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 01:49 PM Jun 2016

(Holland Tunnel) The Latest: Lawyers Will Seek to Have Gun Evidence Tossed

Source: Associated Press

The Latest: Lawyers Will Seek to Have Gun Evidence Tossed

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS JERSEY CITY, N.J. — Jun 22, 2016, 1:41 PM ET

The Latest on three people arrested with a cache of guns at the Holland Tunnel (all times local):

1:30 p.m.

Attorneys for three Pennsylvania residents facing numerous charges after weapons were found inside a van stopped outside New York City say they will seek to have the evidence thrown out.

The attorneys for John Cramsey, of Zionsville, 53-year-old Dean Smith, of Whitehall, and 29-year-old Kimberly Arendt, of Lehighton, argued Wednesday the search that uncovered the weapons Tuesday in New Jersey was illegal.

The three pleaded not guilty. A Hudson County judge declined to give them the option of paying 10 percent of their $75,000 cash bail.

A law enforcement official told The Associated Press one of the people said they were headed to Brooklyn on Tuesday to "rescue" a teenage girl. The official wasn't authorized to discuss the ongoing investigation and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/latest-arrested-tunnel-set-court-appearances-40043203
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Holland Tunnel) The Latest: Lawyers Will Seek to Have Gun Evidence Tossed (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2016 OP
Any good defense lawyer would do that. Glassunion Jun 2016 #1
Yep, but it's kind of uphill jberryhill Jun 2016 #2
True. But step one is usually have evidence dismissed. Glassunion Jun 2016 #3
Oh, of course jberryhill Jun 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jun 2016 #9
Did these lawyers not read leftynyc Jun 2016 #4
According to recent SCOTUS ruling benld74 Jun 2016 #6
Why they had the guns cagefreesoylentgreen Jun 2016 #7
Yes, i'm sure thats the story philosslayer Jun 2016 #8
News reports say they found the woman. Eugene Jun 2016 #10
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
2. Yep, but it's kind of uphill
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jun 2016

It's one thing to pull over a car for a cracked windshield, and then use that as a pretext to search the trunk.

It's quite another thing to pull over a car for a cracked windshield, and then see whatever is in plain view.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
5. Oh, of course
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jun 2016

One theme in the background here is the idea that the employee was looking for a reason to pull them over.

Response to jberryhill (Reply #5)

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
4. Did these lawyers not read
Wed Jun 22, 2016, 02:12 PM
Jun 2016

this week's supreme court decisions? The cops can stop anyone anywhere now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Holland Tunnel) The Late...