General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have very mixed feelings about Brexit
On one hand, it is partially a result of bigotry and xenophobia.That is bad news
But it is also a populist revolt against the elites who have gutted the economy for workers while enriching the coffers of Global Corporate Empires and Banksters.
It was a giant public rejection of usual stranglehold of "elite conventional wisdom" that has undermined democracy and broadly based economies.
Every sword is usually double-edged. This one is no exception, IMO.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)British youth and the college educated overwhelmingly voted to say. As you can see from the image, the vote was anti-liberal, anti-progressive, pro-regressive, anti-immigrant.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Chucky Todd, of all people, summed it up pretty well. He cited the fact that many different factors contributed to this, including the chaos engendered by the turmoil in the Middle East.
He referred to that old saying about the web of effects when a butterfly flaps its wings.
It is possible that a post Brexit Britan will elect right wing pigs. But it is also possible they will elect progressive politicians. Or a mix of both.
But bottom line is that the long process of boiling the lobsters, who don't notice until they die was briefly interrupted. What is done with that is anybody's guess -- but it was at least interrupted and long-simmering issues have to be dealt with.
lapfog_1
(29,194 posts)It was written on the bloody bus and Farage says it was a 'mistake' to promise money to the NHS. They LIED.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)they're lying. One of these days people will discover that. I hope it's not too late for all of us.
lapfog_1
(29,194 posts)and globalization.
They are cheering the result.
But this twitter post pretty much sums up the reality,
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ft-reader-comment-eu-referndum-brexit-sums-um_uk_576d0185e4b0d25711496124?edition=uk&utm_hp_ref=uk
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)in the socialist left. And they had some good arguments to support their stand. But my comrades supported "Remain" for equally good reasons or better. Mostly because this vote will encourage the right-wing and proto-fascist forces in Europe.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)They are about to reap the whirlwind....
lapfog_1
(29,194 posts)When the facts met the myths they were as useless as bullets bouncing off of aliens.
---
The USA is maybe even worse of when it comes to fact free claims being made by racist isolationist demagogues
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Disaffected working people who don't completely understand why or how they are being screwed could just as easily be brought into our camp if we offered some hope of an unfucked future. Austerity and joblessness in the face of rampant wealth concentration is not that hope.
call out and condemn hate, racism and xenophobia, but don't simply dismiss individuals and groups of people who are being screwed and searching for answers.
My take anyway...
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)ignorance.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)They had a report from some seaside town that voted to Leave.
The reporter said he had interviewed townspeople who said that many felt displaced by an influx of new immigrants, and they felt they were being crowded out. In addition, the owners of businesses that had previously employed local people were bringing in foreign workers at lower salaries instead.
Simple bigotry, or people being pushed to their limits of tolerance by social and economic forces?
No easy answers sometimes.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)The only reason the leave vote won was because the UK still has hand counted paper ballots. If they had electronic voting machines, I have no doubt the vote would have been for Remain.
It goes to show that paper ballots help ensure democracy -- whether for good or bad.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)no one tests how true they are.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)So, we will see if the elites overturn the will of the people... Then the 'bigots' will be correctly upset about such.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)n/t
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Fortunately, it didn't catch on here.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)Britain's industrial losses weren't primarily due to trade with Europe and they certainly weren't due to European immigration. If you can put that causal link together, more power to you. Trade with much less developed countries than anything on the continent (aside from bit players like Bulgaria) has a lot more to do with their ills. They simplified all of their anger into a single point.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's an unfortunate pattern of history that we seldom do anything about anything until forced to by upheavals.
The point is that people feel powerless in the face of massive combinations of forces.
We seldom stand up to those, and instead just let things simmer. Sometimes, wake up calls are necessary..
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)They've simply changed the location of their over-seers..
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)smart people that are informed and a little wise - have mixed feelings about this
katsy
(4,246 posts)When tptb want all the money AND all the power... comes the backlash.
The rw uses fear of "the other" and hatred for anyone "not us" to stoke anger. Then the elites, who may as well be living on mars for all they know of the hardships their policies inflict on ordinary people, implement unfair trade deals. Perfect storm.
All parties involved are perfectly wrong.
The politicians perfectly ignore an effective & fair safety net for all workers.
They perfectly do not ensure that earnings aren't just a race to the bottom, but a fair assessment of the workers contribution to society.
The capitalists view profit as their only goal & divorce themselves from the society they were once a member of. Labor has no seat at that table.
Oh you can try to have it all... the power & the money concentrated at the top. But only for so long because it will always, always cause an ugly backlash.
You want a healthy society? Take the power or the money. But not both. Either give the workers the money or give them power over the direction of their communities. That's a successful formula for peace. At least IMO.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)katsy
(4,246 posts)Wish i had considered that.
You are correct.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Bad Thoughts
(2,514 posts)The former is more primal and more easily conservative and reactionary.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)anti-Europe, anti-immigrant sentiment for decades. This ill-judged, foolhardy referendum campaign allowed them to push it to never-before-seen levels.
No, zenophoia, bigotry, racism and neo-fascism are the culprits, not a "revolt against corporations and the elite".
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's not always clearcut
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Unfortunately, just as Reaganism is still wreaking havoc on America's working and middle classes 30 years on, the same is true of Thatcherism in the UK.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)And my group supported "Remain" BECAUSE of those reasons. But there were some good arguments on the LExit side of things too. Unfortunately, those arguments got outshouted by the racists and proto-fascist right wing.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)but other socialist groups supported the Brexit and had some good arguments in their favor. It was definitely a mixed bag.
Now I'm just wondering if this is the push that tips the world economy into the next recession.
pampango
(24,692 posts)Neal Farage of UKIP who is an anti-immigrant right winger and Boris Johnson who may succeed Cameron as Prime Minister. Johnson's goal is to turn the UK into a "neoliberal fantasy island" and a "hyper-capitalist island freed from EU regulation".
Replacing the EU's worker and environmental protections with "hyper-capitalism" does not seem aimed to harm the 1%.
I don't see a double-edged sword - just a single-edged conservative one.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)They can elect good progressive politicians to fill thevoid, or shitty right wing ones.
That's up to them. I don't think everyone who supported this would also automatically vote for right wing cranks, and there was a mix of motives involved.
pampango
(24,692 posts)to the whim of caliber of politicians that get elected.
I would prefer that "shitty right wing" politicians not have the power to strip away these rights. That may be "undemocratic". So be it.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Person 2713
(3,263 posts)tandem5
(2,072 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 24, 2016, 08:11 PM - Edit history (1)
a solution in and of itself when in fact it is only just that, a recognition, which is maybe a good first step, but a knee jerk reaction of cutting out a tumor is not likely to cure the underlying systemic cancer.
In the case of America, a populist movement that elects a top ballot individual isn't likely to send a message or wrest free a stranglehold. It is the same ol' story: engaging in uncomfortably boring and anti-adhd requiring work that examines how our representatives are appointed in each branch of government and then implementing reform there would bring about real change. For example tackling the very complex and corruptible congressional district drawing across our country would have a huge impact on our national political landscape, but the work and focus involved would be equally monumental.
If populism can't be harnessed to tackle complexity then maybe it's not really a signal that something's wrong; maybe its just another component of what is wrong.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)represent us and work on the details.
That's the theory of representative government -- the "good people with smarts and correct intentions" is the key to that.
tandem5
(2,072 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 25, 2016, 02:39 PM - Edit history (1)
and in this case the UK's parliament is within its right to overrule this referendum.
I'm not advocating that every voter familiarize herself with procedural nuance as it pertains to every bill that comes along, but to return to my one example about gerrymandering, it is sort of difficult to elect good people when the electorate has been hand picked to select the corrupt one. I'm not necessarily saying that an individual should take on a redistricting board directly, but to even hope to affect change we need voters that are aware and informed especially at the state and local levels and popular zeal doesn't usually translate to long-term resolve to understand a larger, complete picture of the political landscape.
daleo
(21,317 posts)This is a rebuke of global capitalism, though many adherents of the position are motivated by bigotry and isolationism.
Conversely, many adherents of international labour arbitrage via exploitive global capitalism disguise their true motivations in a warm blanket of international egalitarianism and fellow feeling, when they just want a cheap and compliant workforce.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)I would tell that POS Juncker that invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty depends on his actions.
Play a little poker here, UK folks.
Trust me, with the upcoming 3rd Greek bailout and impending European bank crisis...you will be happy in one year that you have this referendum in your hip pocket.
There will be other countries heading for the door soon.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Even if article 50 is evoked, it isn't permanent nor is the two year timeline have a strict deadline. That is, article 50 also gives the framework on how to re-join the EU. So, you have a good point that this could be a good negotiating point. Junker is, incorrectly, stating this is the end of the relation of the UK and the EU.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Germany itself has offered "associate membership" to the UK, according to reports. Apparently they had "plan B" all ready to go.
Shows that Berlin is the true power in charge of the EU, not Juncker or Schulz.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)And, that is a large part of why the UK wanted out, it was their local power was being usurped by unelected beaurocrats in Brussels and not just because the majority of the UK residents are unintelligent, racists.
MerryBlooms
(11,761 posts)I have no idea how this how this disentangling will unfold. I'm pretty sure all the 'experts', on msm are talking out their collective ass.
Whatever happens, man, what an incredible unexpected turn.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)"populist revolt against elites"...no, it wasn't. Have you actually followed the campaign, at all? Are you aware of who exactly was leading the "Leave" campaign? Nigel Farage, former City broker and public schoolboy (NB this means that he went to a private boarding school), and Boris Johnson (Old Etonian, Oxford graduate, Bullingdon Club member). A lot of the leaders of the "Leave" campaign WERE elites. And it wasn't a "revolt against elites", it was a reactionary backlash against immigration. The Leave campaign was using posters like this:
I'm REALLY getting kind of sick of seeing generally ignorant and ill-informed Americans who know jack-all about the politics, the issues, and the campaign giving their witless opinions of how it's a "revolt against elites".
Number23
(24,544 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Did you read the Op?
I haven't the time but have someon expkain to you whst "mixed feelings" means.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)and half of your "mixed feelings" are based on bullshit.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Just don't assume people who don't agree with you are all ignorant
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)I'm pretty sure you're ignorant.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I know that a lot of shitty elements were involved in the Leave movement
Once again have someone explain mixed feelings to you
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)And your bullshit "neoliberalism" "striking back at elites" blah blah is nothing more than nonsense that has very little to do with most of the arguments and reasons I've heard for why people voted to leave.