Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat's with all this 'Republican candidate but didn't mention him by name' stuff?
Hear it everywhere. Why won't they say 'Trump'? Is it fear that it is just more free advertising for him? Is this a thing now? He that shall not be named? And is this a good thing?
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's with all this 'Republican candidate but didn't mention him by name' stuff? (Original Post)
floppyboo
Jun 2016
OP
spanone
(141,223 posts)1. like a pile of shit, it needn't be named.
Zippyzagnut
(77 posts)2. Drives him nuts
not to be named, adored, exalted. His Cheeto Ego is so big it needs regular feedings.
PJMcK
(24,901 posts)3. It's like Voldemort
"He who shall not be named."
Faux pas
(16,230 posts)4. It doesn't
feed his ego when he can't hear his name.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)5. oh, okay - so it is a thing
thing is, he's a tricky little bugger. I don't have the imaginative energy to put into this, but could he, that shall not be named, turn it to his advantage?
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)6. Been that way for a long time.
"My opponent..." In the world of sound bites, mentioning the opponent's name can be torqued the wrong way. Silly, isn't it?
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)7. Republicans built it and the Republican Party must own it.
