Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:17 PM Jun 2016

NAFTA Still Damaging the American Economy and Workforce

"The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented in 1994, two decades ago, under the guise of “free trade” – an agreement whose purpose was to remove trade barriers between Mexico, Canada and the United States. The result was nothing short of a disaster for the United States.

Before NAFTA was signed the United States actually traded at a surplus with Mexico. Mexico continues to be a major trading partner for the United States (our third largest), but that surplus has turned into a consistent deficit. In 2012 our imports from Mexico exceeded our exports by $61 billion. That is $61 billion that shipped across borders instead of being kept in the U.S. where it can create more jobs.

A recent study found that from its implementation until 2013, NAFTA had cost the U.S. 1 million jobs. This is a staggering figure, and yet it tells only part of the story. American jobs have left because factories have left, which will make it even more difficult to restart the American economy. We are losing institutional knowledge that once made us the most productive country in the world, and we are doing so because of a failed policy our politicians refuse to put a stop to NAFTA.

As a candidate, President Obama campaigned under the guise of a trade reformer. He said he would renegotiate NAFTA, and even made ads denouncing his opponent’s support of the trade deal.But since entering office Obama has acted like every other president of late, in that he has embraced free trade as a solution to America’s economic problems. He has failed to act against NAFTA, and has embraced other NAFTA-like “free trade” deals that are destroying American jobs."
http://economyincrisis.org/content/nafta-still-damaging-the-american-economy-and-workforce

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NAFTA Still Damaging the American Economy and Workforce (Original Post) midnight Jun 2016 OP
The article is complete BS MohRokTah Jun 2016 #1
Your welcome to post a link that supports your opinion. midnight Jun 2016 #4
rofl nationalize the fed Jun 2016 #9
TPP is the death knell for national sovereignity Aerows Jun 2016 #2
Absolutely…. midnight Jun 2016 #3
While you're at it, you'll need to rescind those pesky environmental restrictions, or else .. 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #5
So if we told Mexico to go to hell because of a trade deficit, do you think we'd be better off? Hoyt Jun 2016 #6
Here is a better link to the actual data: appal_jack Jun 2016 #7
don't tell it to all the new-normal-loving folks here. nt TheFrenchRazor Jun 2016 #8

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
9. rofl
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:57 AM
Jun 2016


How's that for a source MohRokTah

Should you require more, you are invited to search "Obama NAFTA" on Youtube.

Have a great election!
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
2. TPP is the death knell for national sovereignity
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:24 PM
Jun 2016

but Hillary supports it, so by default, it's the Democratic platform.

"Let us price your medication out of your fiscal abilities. You are suitably thankful, aren't you?"

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
5. While you're at it, you'll need to rescind those pesky environmental restrictions, or else ..
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:52 PM
Jun 2016

you will be faced with a flood of lawsuits to be decided in secret tribunals by
corporate attorneys, lobbyists and their ilk.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. So if we told Mexico to go to hell because of a trade deficit, do you think we'd be better off?
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:54 PM
Jun 2016

I don't. Because folks would just buy goods from China, etc. Now, we could tell them to go screw themselves too, as well as every other country with which we have a deficit. We still wouldn't be better off economically or from a security standpoint. But we could all be like Trump, all Nationalistic and America Firstist. Archie Bunker would applaud.

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
7. Here is a better link to the actual data:
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:59 PM
Jun 2016
http://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/

The Economic Policy Institute has a lot of good NAFTA and Globalization related information. The OP article should have linked back to somewhere like this, rather than just citing "a recent study."

K&R,

-app
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NAFTA Still Damaging the ...