General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs the problem with Trump or with Trump supporters?
He says he could stand in the middle of Times Square and shoot someone and his supporters would still be with him. Is that true?
It has become more obvious that Donald Trump is not going to change. Is it possible to change his supporters?
The Republican Party, through years of lying and deceit, have created a monster, over which they have no control. It appears that this monster is now in control of the Republican Party?
Is there anything that would turn them away from their support of Donald Trump? So far, we have seen nothing.
Response to kentuck (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Protalker
(418 posts)I went to the Hillary stop in Columbus yesterday. The crowd was diverse. Think of how monolithic the Republicans were.
uponit7771
(90,346 posts)uponit7771
(90,346 posts)... have to say or at least for oppo research.
The issues with people who are fearful is their need to confirm their fears or unease by any means necessary and winger hate media does that for them
Arkansas Granny
(31,517 posts)I think they gravitate to him because he says all the hsteful , ugly things they are afraid to say.
kentuck
(111,098 posts)If they ignore those, there is little hope that many will change, in my opinion.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)it can be incredibly destructive and dangerous. Trump is a rightwing populist.
And sometimes vast swaths of the population are willing, almost eager, to embrace fascism.
kentuck
(111,098 posts)There can be a populism of hate and assorted phobias and there can be a populism for equality and justice.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Light side populists appeal to our ideals and dreams of a better world. Dark side populists appeal to fear and hate, claiming that they will protect us from our worst nightmares.
Not all populism is the same. Some can be a force for good, in my opinion.
Vinca
(50,273 posts)he has molded himself into the hero of a bunch of hate-mongering dimwits. I would hope some would come to their senses, but we could be in a Brexit situation come November: Trump wins and the dimwits say they wish they could take their votes back.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Don The Con is the master of pandering to all sorts of deep-seated and barely suppressed frustration and rage and also of whipping up media attention, that is how he has gotten as far as he has.
It is important to note that the white working class votes for the GOP almost solely because of social conservatism, xenophobia, and racism, not because of Republican economic policy. Drumpf's "genius" was to merge the social conservatism, xenophobia, and racism with an populist-sounding economic message, to the horror of the GOP party establishment, who want nothing to do with that "populism".
I think we are seeing the start of a political realignment in this election, with the Dems becoming the (small L) libertarian and pluralistic party (thanks to Wall Street Republicans fleeing Drumpf) and the GOP the authoritarian nationalist party.
kentuck
(111,098 posts)Both Parties are going thru dramatic changes.
No matter who he shot by some it would be considered justified. If it was someone from a different background then the supporter some would support it. Even if it were law enforcement some would still support him. There are different groups of sovereigns with different beliefs. Most believe the federal government has no right to enforce laws. But as a example some of the sovereign supporters believe the only law enforcement group that has a right to enforce the law is the county sheriff. Federal, state, or city doesn't have any right to. There by they aren't bound to federal, state or city laws.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)chicken or egg?