McConnell: No New Supreme Court Justice Until The NRA Approves Of The Nominee
(apparently I missed this when it first happened)
McConnell: No New Supreme Court Justice Until The NRA Approves Of The Nominee
by Ian Millhiser Mar 20, 2016 11:33 am
CREDIT: AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File
Supreme Court justices are nominated by the president and appointed with the advice and consent of the National Rifle Association, according to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). McConnell offered this unusual view of the confirmation process during an interview with Fox News Sunday. In response to a question from host Chris Wallace, who asked if Senate Republicans would consider the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court after the election if Hillary Clinton prevails, McConnell responded that he “can’t imagine that a Republican majority in the United States Senate would want to confirm, in a lame duck session, a nominee opposed by the National Rifle Association [and] the National Federation of Independent Businesses.”
The Majority Leader’s statement is significant for several reasons. For one thing, it suggests that his previously stated position that “this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new President,” is a sham. Simply put, it’s unlikely that the NRA or the NFIB will change their position on a nominee just because Hillary Clinton is president and not Barack Obama.
But it’s also worth examining exactly who McConnell would give a veto power over nominees. The NFIB, of course, was a plaintiff in NFIB v. Sebelius, the first Supreme Court case seeking to repeal the Affordable Care Act. That lawsuit called upon the justices to impose limits on federal power that even the late Justice Antonin Scalia refused to impose in previous cases (although it’s worth noting that Scalia abandoned his previous principled stance when given the opportunity to cast a vote against Obamacare). When the NFIB isn’t fighting to take health care away from millions of Americans, it fights equally hard against raising the minimum wage.
The NRA, meanwhile, is known for its increasingly absolutist opposition to gun safety laws. Though Garland’s record on guns is fairly thin, the NRA opposes Garland’s nomination based on two cases he considered as a judge.
. . . .
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/03/20/3761908/mcconnell-no-new-supreme-court-justice-until-the-nra-approves-of-the-nominee/
= new reply since forum marked as read
GOTV and sweep these unconstitutional assholes out of office! 
No lobbying group should have any say in the supreme law of the land. McConnell is batshit insane if he thinks he can get away with this. He must be removed as majority leader. And fuck, it's way past time to impeach McConnell for this nonsense. 
Is this even legal? What if the Dems said no supreme court justices would be nominated unless they had the approval of Planned Parenthood? How well would that go over with the far right?
God, I just can't believe this shit! Grrr! 
This is absolutely absurd. 
That would piss me off so much!
I am sure that if we dig deep enough we'll find some cases coming before SCOTUS that will significantly impact our nation's lax gun laws. I'm sure that McConnell is guilty in this.
Maybe you, too, could borrow a copy from Khizr Kahn.
?w=736&h=442&l=50&t=40&q=80
=====================
