Can anyone help me on this. Did Trump actually end his disgusting 2nd amendment statement

[cornball 24]

with "that would be a horrible day, folks"? If so where can I find testament to that and why is it not being reported via MSM? Thank you for your help.

[librarylu]

1. Here's the video:

Note what follows, too.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/donald-trump-maybe-2nd-amendment-people-could-do-something-about-clinton/2016/08/09/4774f2da-5e67-11e6-84c1-6d27287896b5_video.html

Idk on MSM. I've seen it in several stories.

[cornball 24]

17. Thank you for posting the video. This is very scary stuff. He makes me sick to my stomach.

[lame54]

18. The real telling part comes at the 6 second mark...

When the guy gives a big yawn during a Trump speech

[Stubborn]

2. He did and it completely debunks the argument that he was talking about voting against her.

Because, why would it be a horrible day for him if he won.

It would only be horrible if what they did was something else that a second amendment person would do.

[librarylu]

6. I got into it in cyberspace

before the last election with a fellow who absolutely believed the Constitution gives citizens the right to overthrow the government - and then quoted the Declaration to prove it.

[skip fox]

8. Exactly and if you look at the rhetoric

You'll see he had made a dark suggestion because he undercut it twice with "I doono" and then the "horrible day" comment.

In effect he is making the darkest suggestion and then disavowing his involvement in it. It's the same thing as wehne he say "I doon. That's what I' hearing," and such.

The entire statement, its logic (clearly referring to after she's elected), and the two distancing statements show clearly he meant exactly what we all heard and what the man in the background laughs at.

[underpants]

9. We're missed the big statement "Do the right thing"

After he said "horrible day" he said something about "Do the right thing". THAT send chills up my spine.

[skip fox]

10. Wow. I missed that.

Then he drops his turd of a statement, makes two distancing remarks, then turns around and digs the knife in!

That's rhetoric with an edge.

Thanks.

[underpants]

15. Posted the text below and posted in GD

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028087713

[underpants]

14. Text

(CROWD BOOING) If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is. I don’t know. But — but I’ll tell you what. That will be a horrible day. If — if Hillary gets to put her judges — right now, we’re tied. You see what’s going on.

XXX you see what’s going on? We tied because Scalia – this was not suppose to happen. Justice Scalia was going to be around for ten more years at least and this is what happens. That was a horrible thing.

So now look at it. So Hillary essentially wants to abolish the Second Amendment. Now, speaking to the NRA folks – who are great – when you – when you — and I’ll tell you, they endorsed me.

(APPLAUSE)

They endorsed me very early. My son’s a member. I’m a member.

If you – we can add I think the National Rifle Association, we can add the Second Amendment to the Justices – they almost go – in a certain way, hand in hand. Now the Justices are going to do things that are so important and we have such great Justices, you saw my list of 11 that have been vetted and respected.

(APPLAUSE)

And have gotten great. And they to a little equate – but if you don’t do the right thing, either you’re not going to have a Second Amendment or you’re not going to have much of it left. And you’re not going to be able to protect yourself, which you need.

[klook]

27. I'm sure this will be posted on "Great American Speeches"

along with all of Drumpf's other masterpieces of rhetoric!

He got his point across to his minions, though. Looks like the FBI and Secret Service will continue to have their work cut out for them protecting the Democratic president.

[underpants]

29. Ha!

I had to read through the whole thing. For my next trick in going to step on a rake.

Tttthhwwaaapp

[NurseJackie]

16. It was a CALL TO ACTION on a DEATH THREAT...

... there are no two ways about it. It is what it is. It's clearly what it is.

[thecrow]

20. Even though it was surrounded

by a word salad made from diarrhea of the mouth.

[safeinOhio]

24. Have that person look up

Shays Rebellion. You can only do it if you win

Good luck with that.

[librarylu]

3. Oh, and note the guy yawning

just before he got to the gun control part. I guess that woke him up.

[Glimmer of Hope]

5. And there is the couple that looked at either and smiled. Ugh.

[underpants]

30. Yep, in the red golf shirt

It was pretty clear what he thought Trump meant.

The guy in the blue/black baseball cap over Trumps right shoulder too.

[PearliePoo2]

4. "That would be a horrible day" imo is VERY important.

What did he mean? WHAT would be "horrible" Donald? Please explain! (hopefully to the secret service)

[joshcryer]

13. The way he speaks he leaves whole sentences empty.

It can be interpreted either way, but he knows what he's saying because both interpretations, in his mind, are true.

[tblue37]

21. He said, "That WILL be a horrible day." nt

[PearliePoo2]

23. You're correct. I listened to the clip again.

There is a important, distinctive difference between "would" and "will". (auxilliary verbs)

Would: Used to express contingency or possibility.
Will: Used to express determination, insistence, or persistence.

[July]

7. IIRC, he said WILL rather than WOULD. nt

[sanatanadharma]

11. Trump encouraging the continuance of the trump-pets' "kill her" meme

Trump said, "Nothing you can do folks"
Some audience shouts are then heard
Trump then says, "Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

Was he reacting to what he heard from the audience?
I'd certainly like to know what was shouted out from the audience.
It might clarify that Trump was reflecting (encouraging) the continuance of the trump-pets' "kill her" meme.

[joshcryer]

12. Holy shit, how is this cut out of all the clips I've seen?

[tblue37]

19. He said, "That WILL be a horrible day"--i.e., it was presented as an inevitable outcome that

the event would occur.

[Lars39]

28. Yes! "will" gives it a different meaning than "would".

[Buckeye_Democrat]

22. That's what he said, and it totally debunks the later Trump spin.

Trump would not call it a "horrible day" if gun nuts stopped 2nd Amendment regulations through legal means. He was clearly implying that it would be "horrible" if gun nuts assassinated her.

The MSM? They're often cowards and downright stupid.

I still remember Katie Couric (on some morning show) repeatedly asking people if the second plane crash into a WTC building could have been another accident. Peter Jennings (may he rest in peace) also made some dumb remarks that day. In addition to being stressed by the attacks, some of the commentary that I heard that day made me strongly question the intelligence of some of our reporters.

I assume that someone like Jon Stewart would pounce upon and stay focused on the "horrible day" part of Trump's remarks.

[safeinOhio]

25. The guy comes up with more excusses

Than Carter has pills

[riversedge]

26. yet seems the repug core will vote for the slimeball no matter what he says.

[True Dough]

31. I think the "horrible day" reference

refers to Hillary picking SC judges. Even though "horrible day" precedes Drumpf making referee to Clinton's appointees to the court, Drumpf is a disjointed speaker.

[Demsrule86]

32. I don't know why they ignore that which makes it perfectly clear he meant

assassinate. Start at about 5700 and it ends somewhere around 5730

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>