General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLaw prof on Olympic coverage: "This headline is a metaphor for basically the entire world"
Why should the AP give Phelps more attention for his silver medal than Ledecky got for her gold?
http://www.aol.com/article/2016/08/15/one-headline-about-phelps-and-ledecky-sparks-outrage/21451868/
niyad
(113,253 posts)and racism are so blatant it is beyond painful.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Accomplishment always wins especially world medal counts.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)did he get wearing the kind of high-tech swimsuits they're now banned from competition?
In 2008 alone, he got 8 medals wearing a high-tech swimsuit that is no longer allowed under the rules.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)All this explaining that his silver is bigger than her gold is so lame.
niyad
(113,253 posts)GaYellowDawg
(4,446 posts)Maybe because he's the GREATEST OLYMPIAN OF ALL TIME?? Including the ancient Greeks? I guarantee you that no one living today will ever see Phelps' medal count broken. EVER. Every time that Phelps adds a medal, he adds to the largest medal count by one individual in all history, and that's bigger news than Ledecky's gold. No one comes close to Phelps. Not Ledecky, not Bolt, not Jessie Owens, not Carl Lewis, no one. NO ONE. So if he glances sideways at the pool, he's bigger news than most, and he's bigger news than anyone when he medals.
Some people are flat out of their fucking heads to get poutraged about this. If a headline for Ryan Lochte was in bigger font than Ledecky, you'd have a point, but Jesus H. Christ eating brownies on a Ferris wheel, this is some stupid bullshit.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)How do you know she won't equal or surpass his record? Or that no one else will?
But maybe you're right. Phelps won at least 8 of his Olympic medals wearing the kind of high-tech swimsuit they're not allowing anymore, after 43 world records were set at a meet in 2009. New swimsuit rules mandate "only textile fabrics, banned zippers and restricted the amount of coverage from the waist to the top of the knees for men so-called 'jammers' and to the upper body and upper legs for women."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-olympics-swimsuits-20160805-story.html
Speedo was on the cutting edge of the swimsuit wars with its revolutionary LZR Racer, which was developed with help from NASA's wind tunnel testing facilities and became the go-to attire heading into the 2008 Beijing Olympics.
With polyurethane incorporated into the fabric and strategically placed panels that compressed the body in key spots, the suit helped a swimmer stay higher in the water and minimize resistance essentially mimicking the effect of a dolphin gliding through the ocean.
Phelps was wearing the LZR when he won a record eight gold medals in China, famously capturing a $1 million bonus from Speedo. But by the following summer, the suit was basically rendered obsolete by the fully rubberized models that led the assault on the record books in Rome.
"Pretty much anybody could swim fast in those suits," Beisel said. "Now, you definitely need to be a hard worker and have some yardage and stuff under your belt. You can't just rely on the suits to make you fast anymore."
jmg257
(11,996 posts)pnwmom
(108,974 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 17, 2016, 01:00 AM - Edit history (1)
In 2008, while US swimmers wore the high-tech Speedo swimsuits that they'd signed contracts to wear, swimmers from other countries were wearing non-high tech suits from other manufacturers -- because they'd also signed contracts.
And then everyone saw the results in 2008 and wanted to wear Speedo.
In 2009, almost everyone wore Speedo at the World's, and 43 world records were set in swimming events. That's when the swimming association realized there was a problem in the escalating swimsuit wars.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)Speedo gave away 3,000 of them to competitors at the games in Beijing.
Response to Skeeter Barnes (Reply #45)
Post removed
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)I didn't say that the Phelps won his medals solely because of the suit. But he himself acknowledged that the suit was affecting the times of all the swimmers who wore them.
Were you aware that American swimmers wore Speedo suits because the team had a contract with Speedo? And the swimmers of other countries had signed contracts with other manufacturers. So they weren't all free to wear Speedo, even if the suits were provided to them.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)competing companies, like the US swimmers had signed with Speedo. They couldn't wear the Speedo suits without breaking their contracts.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)That way its fair to all past records.
Response to pnwmom (Reply #26)
Post removed
GaYellowDawg
(4,446 posts)It was the swimsuit?
His career has been built by sustained excellence over four Olympic games, not just one. Phelps is the only swimmer in history to qualify for any event in 5 Olympics. He's the only swimmer in history to win an individual event four times running. But hey, if someone wanted to put forth a completely spurious argument and put an asterisk beside the 2008 Olympics, then fine, let's do that. Without the 2008 Olympics:
- Phelps has 20 medals. More than anyone else in history.
- Phelps has 18 gold medals. More than anyone else in history. Double the next best.
- Phelps has 16 individual medals. More than anyone in history.
- Phelps has 8 individual golds. More than anyone else in history.
So you can pretty much stop it with the swimsuit argument. Phelps was at his prime in the 2008 Olympics. And, because you wanted to pose a deceptive argument, you neglected to mention that all the other medal contenders had the suit, too. If they'd all been swimming in the suits they wore this year, Phelps would still have walked away with 8 golds. Oh, and by the way, Phelps set the world record in the 100m butterfly without the suit in 2009, set the world record in the 200m without the suit in 2009, and holds the eight fastest times ever recorded in the 400m individual medley. There has never been a greater swimmer, and never a greater Olympian.
The fact that you want to put an asterisk by his name because you're whiny about a headline is simply pathetic.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... And I mean that in an admiring way.
Saw an info graphic on it the other day. Short of gills, he was built to swim.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)She won her first gold at age 15 and he didn't win any medals at the same age at his first Olympics.
She has plenty of time to catch up, and she won't win any medals with the assistance of a high-tech suit, as he did in 2008.
With regard to the 2008 Olympics, many swimmers couldn't wear the Speedo suits -- even though Speedo provided them -- because they were bound by contract to wear suits from other manufacturers -- just as US swimmers had agreed to wear Speedos. So the US won the swimsuit war of 2008 because they'd signed a contract with the best company.
brush
(53,764 posts)to win medals than any other sport.
My hat is off to Phelps for his medal count but with so many races in freestyle, fly, breast stroke and all the rest of the myriad of strokes and distances, how could he not amass more medals than anyone?
IMO it got a little monotonous watching the same, unvarying back and forth, back and forth, back and forth visual of pool lanes with swimmers you can hardly see, day after day after day.
I got water-logged.
Thank God for the visual spectacle of gymnastics and track and field where you actually see and appreciated the athletes' skill and efforts.
lame54
(35,283 posts)by not swimming fast
brush
(53,764 posts)the medals' worth imo.
Usain Bolt's "fastest man in the world" title three Olympics in a row is much more impressive.
lame54
(35,283 posts)Phelps kicks ass
lame54
(35,283 posts)that he is a kick as swimmer regardless?
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)would have been if he hadn't been wearing the suit and competing against some swimmers who were required (by commercial contract) to wear other suits. All the US team members benefited from the US contract that year with Speedo.
lame54
(35,283 posts)niyad
(113,253 posts)deathrind
(1,786 posts)Some of the "poutrage" (as you put) about this stuff is really over the top.
There was a post the other day about how horrible and sexist and selfish it was that a young man got on stage an proposed to his teammate/girlfriend who got a medal for diving right after the medal ceremony.
Stubborn
(116 posts)Orrex
(63,199 posts)I'd better fire up my Netscape and log into my Geocities account.
kick
niyad
(113,253 posts)still have, and use, ao-hell.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Phelps has more medals, phelps is probably the greatest swimmer of all time.
niyad
(113,253 posts)and continuous.
see this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016165409
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028100005
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)niyad
(113,253 posts)lame54
(35,283 posts)Phelps was a bad example to choose for your argument
treestar
(82,383 posts)That should make her a bit more famous. It should have been the bigger headline. Who cares if she was known before? She should be now
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)That he's so damn important no one else matters even when they got a gold. Forget sexism. She should be of greater interest because she is the one on the rise. Him getting yet another medal is boring.
And as to the ancient Olympian he likely competed in many different event so mere number doesn't change the fact he was the greatest.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)As well as Bolt's so you can rejoice if that makes you feel something.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Newspapers aren't in the business of being fair. They are in the business of selling headlines. Phelps is far more popular around the world and is the most decorated Olympian of all-time. He's going to get the headlines and overshadow every other athlete, male and female. Is it fair? It depends on how you look at it. We will likely never see another athlete like Phelps again in our lives. He's got more than twice the gold medals than the best Olympians in history.
niyad
(113,253 posts)that does not excuse the sexism displayed against the women athletes.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)If Ledecky had 23 gold and wasn't getting the same attention, then you would have an argument.
Ledecky has 5 gold and is only 20. She's got time to rack up a bunch more. Her time will come.
niyad
(113,253 posts)but, honestly, we can tell all by ourselves. see some of the quotes in the article in the OP
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Unless of course you don't favor an equal world.
niyad
(113,253 posts)can all use the laughs.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)I don't remember anyone here complaining about sexism when the women's gymnastics team was getting more attention then the men's. Heck, for most of the games, the mens were on TV late at night while the women were in prime time. Why was that? Maybe because the women were winning and getting better ratings? Probably. But you don't see men whining about every frickin' headline evaluating it under a magnifying glass for any semblance of sexism.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)Simone Manuel didn't even merit having her name in the title.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/aug/12/simone-manuel-headline-apology-san-jose-mercury-news
GaYellowDawg
(4,446 posts)Especially when you're wrong.
niyad
(113,253 posts)matter how much those doing it try to deny it. but, as I said before, keep trying. we need the laughs.
treestar
(82,383 posts)So that does not explain it at all.
Hell normally the media thinks of a silver medal as a "loss."
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... And there will never be as much interest in women's sports as men's.
Short of non sustainable bursts of flavor of the month of course.
Plus the whole 23 medal thing...
snooper2
(30,151 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)And she a gold, she should have led. These excuses a e ridiculous. I don't care how great he is. Others count too.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)And good for him, he argued for a ban on these suits. But they did confer an advantage on the wearers.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)pnwmom
(108,974 posts)because they were believed to give the wearers unfair advantage. In 2009 43 world records were broken when everyone started wearing suits like this -- but they weren't in 2008.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)pnwmom
(108,974 posts)She's only 19 now and has a real chance to equal or even surpass his record -- without the help of any high tech swim suits.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/rio-2016/2016/08/07/michael-phelps-medals/88361712/
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)pnwmom
(108,974 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)On that day, Katie Ledecky won just 1 of 35 gold medals handed out at the 2016 Summer Olympics. And she won a total of 3 golds and 1 silver, in one of the best performances at these Olympics. She was also sharing the limelight with dozens of other athletes at the pinnacle of their career.
To date, Michael Phelps is the greatest swimmer in the modern era, be it male, female, American or whatever. Phelps' shadow will be cast over the Olympic pool for decades, and announcers will be talking about him and his performances in the pool in 100 years.
Katie Ledecky is a great swimmer. If she continues her work, commitment and training, she has every chance to surpass Phelps in his achievements. On that day, I will cheer just as loud as everyone else, and her legacy will be just as prominent as Michael Phelps.
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)They gave away over 3,000 of them. So much for your idea that Phelps had an unfair advantage. Your attempt to put an asterisk next to some of his accomplishments is laughable.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)next to all the records set by wearers of high tech suits.
And Phelps himself argued that the suits should be banned. Otherwise, it wouldn't be the best swimmer winning, but the best swimsuit technology developed for each Olympics.
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)advantage but he didn't have an unfair advantage. Anyone who wanted those suits had access to them for free. The only ones who didn't use them chose not to. Most did use them. They gave away over 3,000 of them at the Olympics in 2008.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)....just a feeling.
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)The fact is, anyone that wanted them got them for free. Phelps enjoyed no unfair advantage and his performance will set the standard for generations. Even Katie Ledecky herself acknowledges he is the GOAT.
Time for me to go. Beach volleyball is on.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)In 2009 43 new world records were set and the swimming association finally decided to ban the suits -- with Phelps's blessing. He didn't want any part of his records to be affected by the swimsuit he wore.
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)contenders did. But you can have the last word. I have to be up at 1:30 am for work. Good night.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)swimmers realized how well the suits had worked. Till then there was good reason for thinking the Speedo hype was just hype.
There was also a Customs glitch that slowed the suits getting to the Olympics -- I've read about the glitch but not whether it affected any of the races.
Anyway, after the event there was data showing the swimsuit effect. And they decided not to allow the Olympic teams to get into escalating swimsuit wars over very expensive, high-tech swimsuits.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)GaYellowDawg
(4,446 posts)It's pathetic.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I don't think, therefore, that he is necessarily the best of all times just because he has the most medals.
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)GaYellowDawg
(4,446 posts)Team, all-around, and several different individual events. And yet Phelps is ten medals beyond the greatest gymnast in Olympics history.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)where swimmers in some other countries couldn't wear them.
US swimmers were bound by contract to wear Speedo suits. They lucked out because the Speedo suits made the swimmers more buoyant. 98% of the medals in 2008 went to Speedo wearers.
Some other countries had signed contracts with different manufacturers. They were out of luck. Even though Speedo gave them the buoyant suits, they weren't allowed to wear them.
After 2009 when swimmers wearing high tech suits broke 43 records, the swimming association banned them. But those records remain on the books, because they were legal then.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I wish Ledecky the best, but at this moment Phelps is the greater swimmer, so greater coverage is not suprising.
If I saw the article my fist question would have been "who os Ledecky"
GaYellowDawg
(4,446 posts)Phelps is the best of all time, but Ledecky is completely dominant right now and I would consider her the best swimmer on this Olympics team, male or female. She set two world records this Olympics and in the process beat the silver medalist in the 800m freestyle by 11 seconds. I've never seen a victory like that. She beat the other swimmers like the Bird-Magic-Jordan Dream Team beat other basketball teams. That kind of dominance. She is an incredible athlete and an incredible Olympian, and it's a shame that some turds on this board think they have to run down Phelps to support her.
brush
(53,764 posts)is quite a calling card.
That makes Usain Bolt as great if not greater than Phelps as far as Olympic athletes go.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)Ledecky hasn't gotten there yet.
niyad
(113,253 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)Because of "blatant sexism" of course. You're asking for Ledecky to receive unequal treatment because of her gender, not her accomplishments.
niyad
(113,253 posts)Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)There's really no shortage of coverage. He's still the bigger name at this point though, simple as that.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Seriously. People need to chill.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Taitertots
(7,745 posts)It's grievance culture run amok.