Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP preps tough perjury case against Clinton
Fuck them. And prosecute any of them who leak the contents of these emails.
GOP lawmakers have claimed that the Democratic presidential nominee broke the law by lying under oath about her private email setup during her marathon appearance in October.
Next month, Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee plan to make the issue a central part of a hearing with senior officials from the FBI, a committee aide said on Thursday. Legally, the GOP faces a tough case. Politically, however, raising the perjury allegations would be a way to keep the issue of Clintons truthfulness in the public eye throughout the fall as she battles Republican nominee for the White House.
Proving that someone committed perjury means overcoming a high hurdle: that the person knowingly told a falsehood under oath.
Convincing lawyers at the Department of Justice to take the case would also be difficult because prosecutors would have to prove that what the former secretary of State said during the 11-hour hearing was directly at odds with the truth.
There is no case, said Stephen Ryan, a former federal prosecutor and general counsel for the Democratic-run Senate Government Affairs Committee, bluntly.
Even if you tried to step back from the politically-laden nature that this was the Democratic presidential nominee and you look at it, theres no way the Department of Justice would touch a case like that.
More:
read:http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/291884-gop-preps-tough-perjury-case-against-clinton
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My Stuff » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My Stuff » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1238 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

GOP preps tough perjury case against Clinton (Original Post)
cali
Aug 2016
OP
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)1. This will backfire into the Republicans losing the House.
cali
(114,904 posts)3. I wish that were true, but that is a very, very steep hill.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)5. Not really. The dumbmander will bite their asses.
To gerrymander the way the Republicans did it, with narrow margins optimizing the number of districts they could gerrymander, placed them at high risk in wave elections while placing no risk on the incumbent Dem candidates
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/04/30/1521826/-45-districts-to-flip-in-a-Democratic-wave-election illustrates this.
cali
(114,904 posts)6. yes, really. Even without the gerrymandering, it would be.
Americans may loath Congress but they like their own reps. I'll be damned happy if dems win 10 seats in the House on November 8.
liberal N proud
(60,106 posts)2. How many more millions will these fucks waste?

All for a publicity stunt aimed at smearing their opponent.
cali
(114,904 posts)4. As much as they can.