General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, tell me again why I should hunt with a rock, a long bow ...or a spear.
Am I not up to the manly challenge? What are you afraid of? Why don't you play fair? Where is the skill, the challenge?
Discuss.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Whatever it takes to receive maximum entertainment from killing a bear, have at it.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)underpants
(182,788 posts)You can eat it right there.
Fla_Democrat
(2,547 posts)There's no place to attach the bayonet.
IADEMO2004
(5,554 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Xolodno
(6,390 posts)...who supplement their protein intake via hunting. If they didn't, they would be eating a lot more ramen. Don't make enough to each much meat, but make too much to qualify for assistance.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)In fact, I don't believe it for one second.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)ronnie624
(5,764 posts)That someone in the US has to hunt to eat.
And I don't object to the claim, I simply don't believe it.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)I do know people for whom deer season is the difference between a pleasant winter and an unpleasant one, though.
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)They always try to reduce the number of people getting assistance, but not the conditions that lead to people requiring assistance. I imagine the people supplementing their meat intake either have reasonably priced hunting permits or poach. I suppose if you have the skills necessary it's an alternative to going vegan.
underahedgerow
(1,232 posts)readily available in shops and markets is just, well, counter-evolutionary.
Find another amusement that doesn't involve the torture and slaughter of animals. Just sayin'.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)1) one reason people hunt is becuase it is for a source of inexpnsive food. If my sisters family doesn't get a deer or two, they don't get much in the way of meat.
2) with the destruction of most natural predators, hunting is necessary to ensure ecological balance. If deer become overpopulated, they destroy local food sources and the deer population starves, the destruction of food sources further impacts the local food chain.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)... unless I REALLY need the food.
If I hunt, I'm certainly going to take advantage of the fruits of human intellect when I do it. It's the only trait that gives humanity an advantage.
That's also why most athletics mean so little to me. Give me the strongest man in the world and place him naked against an adult Bengal tiger or grizzly bear. A lot of good those muscles will do him!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Me ... I hunt cows ... in their natural habitat ... at the supermarket.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)that the land they are on is often paid for by hunters & fishers through various special permits, taxes and fees. Some even pay for the federal "duck stamp," though they do not hunt (birders are esp. prone to taking an extra responsible step). Good habitat for game is good habitat for all flora and fauna.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)I do own an A7, but the 70-200mm F/4 is still on my Christmas list.
Wildlife photographers have a lot in common with hunters, though. Hunting isn't my bag of tricks, but I understand why people do it.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)have similar equipment to go on an African "safari" with.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I'm a private eye. I'm working a guy right now. He's embezzled quite a sum and has multiple firearms. He's running from me while staying in town to make a deal. I'm not supposed to do anything but video the players in the deal, send it to a lawyer, and get out of town.
Hunt bad people. It's way more fun than a dumb animal that hasn't done anything to you.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)in some working order. BTW, animals (last I heard) have not bought into humans' need for justice and retribution. Thank god, no? Who wants to burden them with that?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)"There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter."
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)just before he was murdered, throwing into the mob's faces the old backwoods credo.
Lance Bass esquire
(671 posts)I have state of art gear.
A worm on a hook.
Checkpoint advantage goes to the fish.
Most of the time i just drown worms all day .
Why it's called fishing and not catching.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)PJMcK
(22,035 posts)The OP was about hunting without a gun. Please explain your leap to "carrying an AR-15 to a political rally."
Thanks, in advance.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I really don't get people who do primitive hunting on bears.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)I don't know if those states have bear seasons, but there are plenty of deer a feral hogs. Much of the distaste for hunting comes, I believe, from the hoopin' and hollerin' and the high-five stuff that some feel compelled to engage in when a kill is made. I certainly am gratified when a deer I shoot goes down quickly with no need for a search, but why the Daytona beach party stuff has to infect the woods is beyond me. I do have reservations about spears, but much of the decision-making around legal means will probably come from one side's data on recovered game vs another's. Pretty murky area.
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)Hunt with a hammer. Lots of gunners tell me that hammers kill more people than rifles so surely they are equally devastating against game animals.
Of course if your are too afraid to leave your house without a gun on your person perhaps you might want to man up and get a black belt so you can use your fists against the game you seek---gunners tell me that fists kill as many people as rifles so they must be equally dangerous to animals, right?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)sarisataka
(18,633 posts)On hunting with a can of beans?
linuxman
(2,337 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Cans of beans are a very effective weapon and delicious too.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Sometimes, when I'm feeling cooperative, I like to join in with friends and drive a herd off a cliff using fire. Then we drink some light beers, to stay in manly shape.
linuxman
(2,337 posts)Seems primitive hunting gives too much of a margin for error in making a quick, clean kill. Can you make a bad shot with a rifle and maim an animal? Sure. Is your chance of doing so with a knife/spear/atlatl a good deal greater? You bet. I'm not going to begrudge someone who does it, but if I were a hunter, I'd stick to modern firearms.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)in your user name. So don't use the "hunting" excuse to rationalize what gunners have done to society, directly or indirectly.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)EDIT: I don't promote guns for you.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)when the go out to the store
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)safeinOhio
(32,674 posts)road kill. Cook it right and it taste like chicken.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)He was shot by another hunter so I stopped hunting for about 10 years, to many drunks tromping around the forest for my liking. I later took up hunting with a compound bow and never looked back, bow hunting is way safer. Anyways hunt with whatever you want, it's your life.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)In the year 2015 only two hunters were killed by a firearm while hunting. One by shotgun; the other by accidental discharge of her own rifle. Most researchers credit mandatory hunter ed courses for the incredible drop in hunter death/accidents nation-wide.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)And I wish the deer had weapons and could use them against hunters,
Rex
(65,616 posts)What a strange OP.
EX500rider
(10,842 posts)Many hunters noticed that many vegans/etc have said hunting with rifles is too easy and they should try it the old fashioned way with a spear....somebody does it and the non-hunters screamed foul...
Rex
(65,616 posts)Dammed if you do, dammed if you don't. Personally, I am impressed at the stupidity of anyone taking on a bear with a spear.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)with a spear. Lots of anti-hunting posts.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Now, how about that guy that knifed a deer? Hiding in plain site next to the feeding trough! That takes skill!
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)It's legal in several states, but usually involves hog dogs, both strikers and grabbers who can bay the animal. There is a video on Youtub of an Hawai'ian hog hunt where the animal is bayed, and the coup de gras is ceremonially delivered by a man with a large knife (matador-style), all to the soundtrack of an operatic "Ave Maria." The Alabama hunt was a little more boisterous.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Rip your leg up in seconds. I respect anyone that will take on a wild animal with primitive tools.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)But yeah...gun...bear...gun...tiger...gun...anything that can kill me in an instant...gun.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)No?
Then why the fuck kill it? Honest question.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)I do not know the answer re: meat used. The last scandal over bear hunting featured a veteran hunter (over 20 bears) who kicked critics back hard, telling them she ate the bear meat. It would be foolish for anyone to post a pic of a kill and NOT saved the meat, either for herself & family or for donation.
Speaking for myself, I don't kill for SD. I hunt and kill animals for the adventure and the food. It is how we once were regarding what we eat: HONEST.
I will unashamedly hunt, kill, and eat this season as well.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Warpy
(111,255 posts)Yes, 80-90% of their diet was from gathering plant foods and snaring small game, both provided by women. However, for manly men justifying a diet of meat, meat, and more meat, the paleo hunting methods using a spear, bow and arrow, or large rock dropped off a cliff would be wholly authentic. Never mind that when hunting was lousy, grubs and termites were on the menu. With supermarkets around there is no reason for that nonsense.
This is the way to do it, up in the Rockies, flint tipped spear in hand. Authentic to the last.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I mean, assuming you're not doing it for food, isn't that what it's all about?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)and check-mating it (killing) for the purposes of eating it (this is challenging enough to put me on auto pilot, so to speak). Though I am old enough to get exhausted field dressing a deer, the activity is enjoyable as well, challenging you to remove non-edibles without spilling fecal matter and urine into the body cavity (I am prepared for that eventuality as well). There is pride in a clean, dressed carcass, all the way through the skinning, separation of lower leg joints, the head and the tail, then washing the animal, quartering, and packing it in ice as meat for the trip home. I have not purchased beef under celophane for over 10 years.
Sport is a debatable term, whose derivation is unclear. It has been laden with many meanings, often negative ones. Currently, it is used to separate modern hunting from "market" hunting (outlawed) and straight "subsistence" hunting (even here, hunters celebrate and enjoy the activity as well). Our culture has a long history of aligning enjoyment, sport, pleasure, etc., with a vulgar puritanism and thereby immorality. But we ALL kill to eat: Directly (hunting/fishing), indirectly (feedlot & factory slaughter), or by abstraction (agriculture, which displaces vast ecosystems which disrupt massive numbers of flora and fauna, most non-game). Which is your means?
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)The idea that people should participate in the hunt with only a heavy heart, after all other possibilities of feeding their starving children have been exhausted, and without any enjoyment or pride in the process whatsoever, is bizarre to me.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)pick the means most enjoyable.
I'm not a vegan, ethical or otherwise, so I don't take issue with people who hunt and then eat or otherwise have some utilitarian use for the animal which they kill. I suppose I do question the value in killing "just for the fun of it"- my issue isn't with enjoyment per se (far from it) but rather my take is what is inherently fun about killing something.
I acknowledge it's a subjective distinction and a rather arbitrary ethical standard, but I kind of feel it's better to actually hunt for the purpose of using the animal in some fashion other than just killing it for pure 'enjoyment' of the act.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And people say MY hobbies are creepy!
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)1) Hunting
2) Meat counter (proxy killing)
3) Agriculture (millions of acres of ecosystem torn up for soy beans, kale and spinach)
What is your favorite method?
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)try berry picking.
Or, if you want to get more risky, try collecting mushrooms.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)If you are vegetarian, then you have resting on a sufficiently numbed urban conscience the death of vast ecosystems which were inhabited by many species of flora and fauna -- including at one time my deer or two each year.
Agriculture is an ancient abstract technology, but it hasn't lost a bit of its power to kill the pain of knowing humans kill.
ileus
(15,396 posts)But as for me and my family we'll stick to the inline muzzle loader, 308/270/243/223/7mm-08/300winmag, Compound bow, and last but not least Crossbow.
I'm not concerned about playing fair, I want to get this crap over with and get back to fishing. Hunting season is a freezer filler, fishing is entertainment.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)presumably non-threatening animals, but hunting for most (including me) is not Coliseum "sport." It is work, and it is enjoyable.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Rock and spears, not so much (although spear-fishing is fun - though so is bow fishing).
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)The book, Casting Her Own Shadow: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Shaping of Postwar Liberalism, quotes the Washington Heralds Earl Miller as saying:
When ER became first lady, she refused Secret Service protection, insisting that she be able to travel as freely as possible. The agents complied with her wishes only after they discovered she knew how to shoot, and convincing her to carry a pistol when she drove alone. Intrigued by yet another example of ERs independence, the press treated ERs packing as front page newsespecially after she nonchalantly remarked: I carry a pistol, and Im a fairly good shot.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Be satisfactory to the anti-hunting / animal rights tribe. You could kill the animal with you bare hands and teeth, and they would still be criticizing you. Go ahead and fill up your freezer and enjoy that good organic meat.