Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 01:45 PM Sep 2016

Oahe dam and DAPL pipeline


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/09/us/dakota-access-pipeline-protests.html?_r=0

Fifty years ago, hers was one of hundreds of Native American families whose homes and land were inundated by rising waters after the Army Corps of Engineers built the Oahe Dam along the Missouri River, part of a huge midcentury public-works project approved by Congress to provide electricity and tame the river’s floods.

To Ms. Bailey, 76, and thousands of other tribal members who lived along the river’s length, the project was a cultural catastrophe, residents and historians say. It displaced families, uprooted cemeteries and swamped lands where tribes grazed cattle, drove wagons and gathered wild grapes and medicinal tea.

~~~

“Even though it’s been more than half a century, they still feel this loss,” said Michael L. Lawson, the author of “Dammed Indians,” a history of the government’s dam projects along the Missouri. He said about 56,000 acres of Standing Rock Sioux land had been condemned for the dams and 190 families relocated. Theirs was one of 23 reservations affected by the project.

“Just about every part of their economy and living situation was impacted,” Mr. Lawson said. “They lost their most important resources in the bottom lands.”



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oahe_Dam
As a result of the dam's construction the Cheyenne River Indian Reservation lost 150,000 acres (61,000 hectares) bringing it down to 2,850,000 acres (1,150,000 ha) today. Standing Rock Reservation lost 55,993 acres (22,660 ha) leaving it with 2,300,000 acres (930,000 ha). Much of the land was taken by eminent domain claims made by the Bureau of Reclamation. Over and above the land loss, most of the reservations' prime agricultural land was included in the loss. The loss of this land had a dramatic effect on the Indians who lived on the reservations. Most of the land was unable to be harvested (to allow the trees to be cut down for wood, etc.) before the land was flooded over with water.[4] One visitor to the reservations later asked why there were so few older Indians on the reservations, and was told that "the old people had died of heartache" after the construction of the dam and the loss of the reservations' land.[5] As of 2015, poverty remains a problem for the displaced populations in the Dakotas, who are still seeking compensation for the loss of the towns submerged under Lake Oahe, and the loss of their traditional ways of life.[6]



http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/08/15/dakota-access-pipeline-standoff-mni-wiconi-water-life-165470

On July 26, 2016 the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe was stunned to learn that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers had given its approval for the pipeline to run within a half-mile of the reservation without proper consultation or consent. Also, the new 1,172 mile Dakota Access Pipeline will cross Lake Oahe (formed by Oahe Dam on the Missouri) and the Missouri River as well, and disturb burial grounds and sacred sites on the tribe’s ancestral Treaty lands, according to Dakota Access, LLC.

Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners will build, own and operate the proposed $3.78 billion Dakota Access Pipeline and plans to transport up to 570,000 barrels of crude oil fracked from the Bakken oil fields across four states to a market hub in Illinois. The pipeline—already facing widespread opposition by a coalition of farmers, ranchers and environmental groups—will cross 209 rivers, creeks and tributaries, according to Dakota Access, LLC.

Standing Rock Sioux leaders say the pipeline will threaten the Missouri River, the tribe’s main source of drinking and irrigation water, and forever destroy burial grounds and sacred sites.


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
1. The current market bet
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 01:59 PM
Sep 2016

is on the price of "clean" water for third world countries. Should we add both North and South America to the list? You decide.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
3. Interesting. Citibank has been leading banks to fund this and has been at the forefront
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 02:27 PM
Sep 2016

of "water investment."

They probably regard this as a win/win for them.

http://www.democracynow.org/2016/9/9/who_is_funding_the_dakota_access

HUGH MACMILLAN: Well, I’ve got a list of the 17 banks that are specifically providing financing for this project. And it’s also coupled together with a Energy Transfer—Energy Transfer Partner project to convert an existing pipeline that would connect to the south end of the Dakota Access pipeline and run oil all the way down to the Gulf Coast, where there are refineries and also export infrastructure.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you tell us that list of 17 banks?

HUGH MACMILLAN: I can. Citibank is the bank that’s been running the books on the project, and that’s the bank that beat the bushes and got other banks to join in. So, we have Wells Fargo, BNP Paribas, SunTrust, Royal Bank of Scotland, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Mizuho Bank, TD Securities, ABN AMRO Capital, DNB First Bank—and that’s actually a bank based in Philly; it’s not the DNB Bank based in Norway, which is actually provided several hundred million to the Energy Transfer family separately—and ICBC London, SMBC Nikko Securities and Société Générale.


http://www.businessinsider.com/water-investing-2012-7
The discussion surrounding water investing is growing as the global population swells and water becomes an increasingly scarcer commodity.

Citi recently held a Water Investment Conference with several panel discussions featuring industry executives and portfolio managers investing in the water space. They released a report with the key takeaways from the panels.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
7. Thank you for bring up water rights issues and fights. It's so important and an essential part
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:22 PM
Sep 2016

Of what is going on here.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
2. The Judge's decision comes down today, correct? Sept 9th.
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 02:19 PM
Sep 2016

Anyone know the latest hour that decision can be made?

I do fear for the Tribe either way this is decided, however.


misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
6. Agree. It will not end. I have family in that part of the country.
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:05 PM
Sep 2016

Sadly it such a racist area that all I heard when I asked about the ordeal was.." There's two sides to this story." And the concensus is that the Pipeline is necessary & "the "indians" have nothing to say about it going through". The Red State also thinks Trump is exactly what this country needs.
I could cry everytime I talk to them. Their kids talk the same way. They hate the KKK but don't realize they talk the same as the Supremacists do.
I have learned to stay far away.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oahe dam and DAPL pipelin...