Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
  Post removed Sun Sep 18, 2016, 09:25 AM Sep 2016

Post removed

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Post removed (Original Post) Post removed Sep 2016 OP
It's odd Loki Liesmith Sep 2016 #1
It is interesting Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #2
A bunch of guys beeaking into DNC headquarters Ilsa Sep 2016 #3
The fact that trump so quickly said it was a bomb speaks volumes Abouttime Sep 2016 #13
Yes, that does sound insane. Ron Obvious Sep 2016 #4
you can't rule anything out at this point. OKNancy Sep 2016 #5
I wouldn't put it past the GOP Sedona Sep 2016 #6
Maybe it was a trial run?? kentuck Sep 2016 #7
this was my first thought too kentuck bench scientist Sep 2016 #36
My first thought was, as kentuck, wncHillsupport Sep 2016 #8
What are the odds of a real terrorist using a pressure cooker after so many years dixiegrrrrl Sep 2016 #14
I think it's likely. OhZone Sep 2016 #9
Really hard to tell much at this stage, not enough information made public. It RKP5637 Sep 2016 #10
Why should Right Wingers have all the conspiracy fun? librarylu Sep 2016 #11
Putting a bomb in a bin is less conspicuous, but I doubt it'd "muffle" it much muriel_volestrangler Sep 2016 #12
I also heard it floated that the Chelsea neighborhood was chosen as an implied threat . . . . Stinky The Clown Sep 2016 #15
Whenever something bad happens the first thing to do is find a political opponent to blame it on. hughee99 Sep 2016 #16
Many care very much about the birther issue and think the lies need to be challenged. bettyellen Sep 2016 #25
Not in any way that will have an impact on the election. People can pretend that it's an election hughee99 Sep 2016 #33
Well if you want to ignore the votes of POC and their allies- as you said some people were still not bettyellen Sep 2016 #35
Do you believe there are many POC voting for trump now hughee99 Sep 2016 #37
I think there are loads of POC as well as every other demographic that have not been paying bettyellen Sep 2016 #39
Anything is possible with the 'deplorables'. malaise Sep 2016 #17
I agree with you. cwydro Sep 2016 #18
I wouldn't rule out Russian involvement, it fits doc03 Sep 2016 #19
That's what I hear people saying. safeinOhio Sep 2016 #34
My guess is that it is a lone wolf/loser rusty fender Sep 2016 #20
Your friend doesn't know much about bombs. linuxman Sep 2016 #21
That is the same exact scenario WhiteTara Sep 2016 #22
I had another theory. Since it was put in a fairly deserted place (for NYC), maybe Vinca Sep 2016 #23
Well Don the Con has stolen every notion of truth malaise Sep 2016 #43
In any case "who benefits?" is a good question, and ISIS supports Trump bhikkhu Sep 2016 #24
I think it's insane. There's not a shadow of a reason to think this. Yo_Mama Sep 2016 #26
Ok. But why is it wrong? Jim Dandy Sep 2016 #27
It should be obvious, but Timing Location Benefit Analysis Yo_Mama Sep 2016 #38
Eh, no underpants Sep 2016 #28
It finally happened Runningdawg Sep 2016 #29
The thing that struck me was that both bombs failed. napi21 Sep 2016 #30
Years ago it was the mob..for one thing or another - asiliveandbreathe Sep 2016 #31
I think it was aliens but I have no proof. N/t karadax Sep 2016 #32
I thought it was tied to Trump immediately! (EOM) karmaqueen Sep 2016 #40
I would not be surprised SFierro2004 Sep 2016 #41
I'm not entirely sure Trump would do it but radical noodle Sep 2016 #42

Ilsa

(64,345 posts)
3. A bunch of guys beeaking into DNC headquarters
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 09:30 AM
Sep 2016

at The Watergate to control an election they were probably going to win anyway seemed far-fetched. Even the chief editor at WaPo wanted to drop it because it seemed like a "why would they bother?" situation, if memory serves.

 

Abouttime

(675 posts)
13. The fact that trump so quickly said it was a bomb speaks volumes
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 10:45 AM
Sep 2016

Did trump have prior knowledge?
It makes complete sense that trump supporters are behind these bombings, it would further their cause by sowing fear, especially fear against Muslim-Americans.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
4. Yes, that does sound insane.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 09:30 AM
Sep 2016

Or at the very least a ridiculous leap of logic from the limited information we have at present. Why not wait until more information is available?

bench scientist

(1,107 posts)
36. this was my first thought too kentuck
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:56 PM
Sep 2016

Someone perhaps doing a trial for something even more devastating later. Sad that these thoughts are so autonomic now.

wncHillsupport

(112 posts)
8. My first thought was, as kentuck,
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 09:50 AM
Sep 2016

that both bombings (the Marine race) and this one in NYC was a trial run and that we had better be on the lookout for something more sophisticated.

How likely is it that both places were completely unrelated as to planners/implementers?

I hope I am wrong.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,157 posts)
14. What are the odds of a real terrorist using a pressure cooker after so many years
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 10:58 AM
Sep 2016

but the same group using a pipe bomb at the race?

Real bad guys are pretty good at using something more sophisticated, like suicide vests or car bombs.
And they usually take credit soon after.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
10. Really hard to tell much at this stage, not enough information made public. It
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 10:11 AM
Sep 2016

could be anything.

librarylu

(503 posts)
11. Why should Right Wingers have all the conspiracy fun?
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 10:35 AM
Sep 2016

Trump gets caught in another lie, ticks off reporters, a bomb goes off.........coincidence?

For a terrorist attack it was pretty lame. Terrorists tend to kill people, not cause minor injuries.

muriel_volestrangler

(106,161 posts)
12. Putting a bomb in a bin is less conspicuous, but I doubt it'd "muffle" it much
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 10:40 AM
Sep 2016

It'd be more shrapnel to fly through the air. Several places have removed public bins when the is a bombing campaign going on.

Stinky The Clown

(68,952 posts)
15. I also heard it floated that the Chelsea neighborhood was chosen as an implied threat . . . .
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 11:09 AM
Sep 2016

. . . . to the Clinton family.

I think any tie back to the Trump campaign is pure conspiracy theory and woo.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
16. Whenever something bad happens the first thing to do is find a political opponent to blame it on.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 11:19 AM
Sep 2016

If you can't find a good, direct reason they might have done it, then you can always suggest it was to distract from something else.

No one really cares about the birther issue anymore. The people talking about it already weren't going to vote for Trump, the Trump supporters already don't care, and the people that haven't made up their minds between Clinton and Trump aren't paying any attention, which is why they're still undecideds.


 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
25. Many care very much about the birther issue and think the lies need to be challenged.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:26 PM
Sep 2016

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
33. Not in any way that will have an impact on the election. People can pretend that it's an election
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:48 PM
Sep 2016

Issue, but it's really not. It isn't changing anyone's mind about who they should vote for.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
35. Well if you want to ignore the votes of POC and their allies- as you said some people were still not
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:53 PM
Sep 2016

Paying attention. It might not be completely reprehensible to you, but to many of us it's completely appalling. I've met a few people who were unaware of his history with this issue- and now they know and are disgusted.
It might now be of interest to you, and that's probably a lucky thing for you. But for many of us it cuts to the bone.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
37. Do you believe there are many POC voting for trump now
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 02:10 PM
Sep 2016

And this will be the thing that changes their mind? I don't.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
39. I think there are loads of POC as well as every other demographic that have not been paying
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 02:22 PM
Sep 2016

Attention. Many people don't even think about it until Fall.

At any rate, you don't seem to realize what a huge issue this is to many people, must be nice.

doc03

(39,075 posts)
19. I wouldn't rule out Russian involvement, it fits
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 11:39 AM
Sep 2016

the pattern of what Putin is capable of.

safeinOhio

(37,611 posts)
34. That's what I hear people saying.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:52 PM
Sep 2016

A false flag operation by Russian mob/KGB/Putting operatives.

 

rusty fender

(3,428 posts)
20. My guess is that it is a lone wolf/loser
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 11:48 AM
Sep 2016

who is angry at the world; the bombs are how he vents

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
21. Your friend doesn't know much about bombs.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 12:24 PM
Sep 2016

"Bins" are a super common place to place IEDs. In Iraq, the trash bins were removed because they wewre so commonly used as drop sites for IEDs. In NYC, postal boxes on the street are locked closed before major events to keep them from having bombs place inside. Generally speaking, putting the bomb into something doesn't muffle shit. The energy will escape one way or another. When binned, it will just take the container along for the ride.

WhiteTara

(31,258 posts)
22. That is the same exact scenario
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:14 PM
Sep 2016

that my beloved postulated to me this morning the first thing when I woke up...he actually woke me up to tell me that!

Vinca

(53,953 posts)
23. I had another theory. Since it was put in a fairly deserted place (for NYC), maybe
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:20 PM
Sep 2016

it was set off as a diversion by a generic criminal who tunneled into a jewelry store or bank in another area of the city. Guess we'll know tomorrow if a business reports a burglary.

bhikkhu

(10,789 posts)
24. In any case "who benefits?" is a good question, and ISIS supports Trump
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:26 PM
Sep 2016

Its safe to say that every nonsensical bit of mayhem is the US up until the election will benefit Trump's poll numbers, and his supporters (of every ilk) know it.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
26. I think it's insane. There's not a shadow of a reason to think this.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:27 PM
Sep 2016

It is, quite flatly, one of the weirdest CTs I have ever seen floated.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
38. It should be obvious, but Timing Location Benefit Analysis
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 02:15 PM
Sep 2016

Benefit Analysis:
1) There are security cameras all over NYC. LE & FBI will use them. They will ID the perps from that pretty quickly.

2) There are several months until the election. The combination of the timing and the extreme probability of finding the perps means there there is an almost total downside to this. Since Trump began to advertise, he has been gaining in the polls rather steadily, and this sort of action would put him out of the running, even if he didn't wind up behind bars. If it were done a week or two before the election, it might be slightly more plausible that it would benefit him, although,

3) Really it would never benefit him, because the president is not a dictator and although the president controls the federal law, the president has no control whatsoever over NYC and NY state LE. And they'd get him, just like Watergate took down Nixon. The impeachment vote would be unanimous.

4) And in the last analysis, it doesn't benefit Trump because there are already plenty of news stories about terrorism, aka Islamic terrorism incidents, and they won't end because of the US election season. So anyone who thinks along these lines and thinks that Trump is likely to handle it better and thinks that the issue is important enough on which to base his/her vote is already going to be for Trump. There are plenty who think that Trump's approach is precisely the wrong one. Those people are not going to suddenly change their mind because of a few relatively negligible incidents.

5) Location again - no one is saying that NJ/NY is in play for Trump under the wildest, most Trump-favorable projections. Why stage it in NJ/NY, when staging attacks in other states that might be swung would be far safer? Investigators don't have nearly the same resources in NC or some such state. However, NJ/NY does have a large population that fits the profile of those who might be ISIS-swung.

6) Timing - while the timing is terrible for staging a Trump-favorable Reichstag fire, it's close to the hadj, and apparently the Islamic nuts have the theory going on that blowing up people earns you special merit if it happens at sacred Muslim times.
https://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/saudi-arabia/

Note that I wouldn't put it past someone to conduct a false-flag type of attack, except for the location. NYC is not the place to do such a thing. But that someone wouldn't be Trump, because it just doesn't benefit him. For him it would just be a big risk.

As for the theory that the birther stuff is significant, that is logistically ridiculous. That just happened! Assuming that Trump had a crew of useful explosive idiots standing by waiting for the phone call, bombs already prepared, and that he made that call when things already were tilting in his favor, is so ludicrous that I can hardly believe anyone suggested it.

It's the sort of thing that might seem possible when stoned or drunk or just waking up, but that expires in the cold sober light of reality.

Runningdawg

(4,664 posts)
29. It finally happened
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:40 PM
Sep 2016

I just came from reading about the violence yesterday on a RW forum and now I am seeing the same posts I saw there, here. Careful folks, the RWers don't like it when you steal their conspiracy theories.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
30. The thing that struck me was that both bombs failed.
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:40 PM
Sep 2016

One failed to explode at all, and the other not completely. From all we've seen, the "terrorists" are trained better than that! To me this sounds like someone who got their instructions off the net, didn't do any trial runs, and failed to execute completely.

ether it was part of the GOP, The Con's surrogates, or some other dumbass remains to be seen. The imprecise execution seems rookie action to me and most likely will be caught soon because of that.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
31. Years ago it was the mob..for one thing or another -
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:44 PM
Sep 2016

someone might have said somethin', or made a GESTURE (where have I heard this before) or somethin' - and oooompa loompa..there you have it....(no innuendo please)

All who were injured a quick recovery....

 

SFierro2004

(11 posts)
41. I would not be surprised
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 02:30 PM
Sep 2016

It's pretty obvious that Trump is determined to win the Presidency at all costs. I wouldn't put it past him to secretly send an operative to plant that bomb as part of a false-flag operation. It would be a welcome distraction from the ongoing birth certificate issue, and would be shown as proof of how Trump is "right" about terrorism.

radical noodle

(10,589 posts)
42. I'm not entirely sure Trump would do it but
Sun Sep 18, 2016, 02:39 PM
Sep 2016

some of the white supremacists and neo-nazis are certainly capable of it. Didn't someone recently film a white supremacist meeting where one of the speakers said they needed to shake things up (not a direct quote, but something similar).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed