Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 10:07 AM Sep 2016

Attorney: Betty Shelby had ‘temporary loss of hearing’ during Terence Cruthcher shooting

How many other excuses will they come up with?

http://thegrio.com/2016/09/29/betty-shelby-had-temporary-loss-of-hearing/


Attorney: Betty Shelby had ‘temporary loss of hearing’ during Terence Cruthcher shooting
by thegrio | September 29, 2016 at 8:41 AM Filed in: News


The attorney for Tulsa Police Officer Betty Shelby said that she had a temporary loss of hearing during the confrontation with Terence Crutcher that prevented her from hearing another officer say that he had his Taser ready.

Attorney Scott Wood said that Shelby had experienced “auditory exclusion,” a phenomenon that sometimes occurs in stressful situations because the person experiencing it is so focused on the critical incident.

Because of this phenomenon, Wood claimed, she did not hear the sirens of the other police car, nor did she hear Officer Tyler Turnbough announce his presence and say that he had his Taser ready.

“She doesn’t have any recollection of that at all,” Wood said.

Wood went on to say that Shelby’s actions in shooting Crutcher were justified because she believed he had a gun. “If you think someone has a gun, you don’t get your Taser out,” he said.

However, the probably cause affidavit stated that “Shelby reacted unreasonably by escalating the situation from a confrontation with Mr. Crutcher, who was not responding to verbal commands and was walking away from her with his hands held up, becoming emotionally involved to the point that she overreacted.”

“The video … clearly showed that Terence Crutcher did not have a weapon, that Terence was not belligerent, that Terence had his hands up, that Terence was not a threat,” said attorney Damario Solomon-Simmons. “When we saw that video, we knew there was no reason for Terence to be shot down in the street.”

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Attorney: Betty Shelby had ‘temporary loss of hearing’ during Terence Cruthcher shooting (Original Post) babylonsister Sep 2016 OP
THIS was murder of an innocent man. tonyt53 Sep 2016 #1
Yes it was. nt babylonsister Sep 2016 #2
Murder implies intent Egnever Sep 2016 #8
And that excuses a manslaughter charge how? She still killed the poor guy for NO justifiable reason. jmg257 Sep 2016 #3
My thoughts exactly. Egnever Sep 2016 #7
Which begs the question; did she think he had a gun because they are so common and easy to get? world wide wally Sep 2016 #4
Begs no such question. She panicked and killed an innocent, unarmed man. brush Sep 2016 #5
Something like 25% of the people own one, so that is possible. No excuse since he did NOT have one jmg257 Sep 2016 #9
You don't hear threatening behavior Egnever Sep 2016 #6
 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
8. Murder implies intent
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 12:39 PM
Sep 2016

I think it would be hard to prove she intended to kill him.

Manslaughter for sure.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
3. And that excuses a manslaughter charge how? She still killed the poor guy for NO justifiable reason.
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 10:40 AM
Sep 2016

Despite what she says.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
7. My thoughts exactly.
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 12:37 PM
Sep 2016

What in the world does hearing have to do with a man that clearly had his hands up. Was she listening for him to put his hands down?

This makes no sense to me at all.

brush

(53,778 posts)
5. Begs no such question. She panicked and killed an innocent, unarmed man.
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 12:30 PM
Sep 2016

We need smarter, cool-headed, non-panicky cops — not to mention cops who can identify with POCs and not fea/hater them as enemies and expendables.

Black lives matter.

Panicky cops who kill unarmed, innocent people need to go to jail.

No questions at all about that.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
9. Something like 25% of the people own one, so that is possible. No excuse since he did NOT have one
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 12:53 PM
Sep 2016

and his empty hands were up over his head.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Attorney: Betty Shelby ha...