What did the Donald mean when he tweeted

[lapucelle]

that he could have won "more convincingly"?

That's an odd choice of words. What makes him think that Americans need to be convinced that he actually won?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/802975667197386752

[TheBlackAdder]

1. Little tweaks to the voting machine's randomizing algorithms could have yielded better results.

[lapucelle]

3. Something tells me that phrases like

"tweaks to the randomizing algorithms" are outside of the scope of the Donald's lexicon.

[TheBlackAdder]

6. That's why his handlers have to dumb down his sentences. Can't dumb down intel briefings though.

[Hoyt]

2. It means it will be a long 4 years if we microanalyze every stupid Tweet he makes.

[RKP5637]

5. Yeah, we'll all end up dumbed down. One has to regress to an infantile level to try to

comprehend WTF we think he's trying to say. God, this man is a damn fool idiot!

[Hoyt]

7. We really are going to miss GOPers like george war bush. Ain't that a kick in the head?

[RKP5637]

8. Definitely! The Bush years will seem tame compared to what this asshole is likely to unleash. n/t

[shraby]

4. Read my post about his tweet

It got posted about the same time as yours did.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028310570

He was changing the subject from this:
Trump’s latest Twitter outrage comes on the heels of the New York Times’ deep investigation into his business conflicts around the world as he prepares to take office.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/politics/donald-trump-international-business.html