General Discussion

kentuck

(111,076 posts) Thu Dec 1, 2016, 04:35 PM Dec 2016

Should we be talking about 2020?

Does anyone think we can make it to 2020 under Trump and the right-wing coup?

Is it naive to be talking about 2020?

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should we be talking about 2020? (Original Post) kentuck Dec 2016 OP

Yes, 2018 treestar Dec 2016 #1

2018 for Congress and 2020 for Prez. What's past is past, and we will make it to 2020. Hoyt Dec 2016 #2

Are you sure about that? kentuck Dec 2016 #3

Absolutely! get the red out Dec 2016 #4

We should be... Mike Nelson Dec 2016 #5

no reason other than weakness or cowardice would prevent making it through this shitstorm LanternWaste Dec 2016 #6

treestar

(82,383 posts)

1. Yes, 2018

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 04:37 PM

Dec 2016

we need to pay more attention to midterms and lower offices.

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

2. 2018 for Congress and 2020 for Prez. What's past is past, and we will make it to 2020.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 04:40 PM

Dec 2016

Might be tough, but we will make it. We've survived Reagan, Nixon, bushes, and we will survive Trump.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)

3. Are you sure about that?

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 04:41 PM

Dec 2016

get the red out

(13,461 posts)

4. Absolutely!

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 04:55 PM

Dec 2016

We can't give up!

Mike Nelson

(9,951 posts)

5. We should be...

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 05:01 PM

Dec 2016

...thinking about 2018.

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)

6. no reason other than weakness or cowardice would prevent making it through this shitstorm

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Dec 1, 2016, 05:05 PM

Dec 2016

I see nothing preventing forward motion between now and 2020. Nixon, Reagan, the Bushes... we made it through that shitstorm, no reasons other than weakness or cowardice (put the two together and you get "defeatism&quot would prevent us collectively making it through this one.

Reply to this discussion