Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichigan attorney general files suit to stop recount
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Washington (CNN)Michigan's attorney general announced Friday he would file suit to stop a recount requested by Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein.
"Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request," Bill Schuette, a Republican, wrote on Twitter.
The state's top law enforcement official said that he had "filed an emergency motion with the Mich Supreme Court to bypass the Court of Appeals to ensure a timely process."
Schuette's office later put out a statement explaining the motion.
"Michigan voters rejected Stein's candidacy by massive margins but her refusal to accept that state-verified result poses an expensive and risky threat to hard-working taxpayers and abuses the intent of Michigan law," Schuette said. "We have asked the court to end the recount which Stein is pursuing in violation of Michigan laws that protect the integrity of our elections. It is inexcusable for Stein to put Michigan voters at risk of paying millions and potentially losing their voice in the Electoral College in the process."
"Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request," Bill Schuette, a Republican, wrote on Twitter.
The state's top law enforcement official said that he had "filed an emergency motion with the Mich Supreme Court to bypass the Court of Appeals to ensure a timely process."
Schuette's office later put out a statement explaining the motion.
"Michigan voters rejected Stein's candidacy by massive margins but her refusal to accept that state-verified result poses an expensive and risky threat to hard-working taxpayers and abuses the intent of Michigan law," Schuette said. "We have asked the court to end the recount which Stein is pursuing in violation of Michigan laws that protect the integrity of our elections. It is inexcusable for Stein to put Michigan voters at risk of paying millions and potentially losing their voice in the Electoral College in the process."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/02/politics/michigan-attorney-general-files-suit-to-stop-recount/index.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 970 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michigan attorney general files suit to stop recount (Original Post)
spanone
Dec 2016
OP
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)1. That settles it. Michigan has something to hide.
spanone
(135,816 posts)2. what are they so afraid of????? expensive? she's paying for it!
..and they will only lose their voice if the state cheated.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)10. The Republicans are definitely hiding Big Electoral Shit
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)3. OMG,another Bush 2000
John Roberts ram job.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)9. John Roberts was not on the Supreme Court in 2000
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)11. OOPS,meant to say another Supreme Court Appointed King.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)13. All the repug Supreme Court members are awful
Every last one of them.
shraby
(21,946 posts)4. I smell the stench of rotten eggs.
dhill926
(16,336 posts)5. um, isn't Stein paying for it?
which would of course call bullshit on the Att. General (repub, of course)....
spanone
(135,816 posts)6. me thinks they doth protest too much....
to quote billy shakespeare.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)7. Hey she cost us the election in those states, least she can do is verify the votes (w/o her money).
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)8. On one hand, this may be a massive waste of time
BUT on the other, the recount in 2000 was what gave us something more than conspiracy theories to challenge the legitimacy of Bush the Lesser.
That being the case, I have to question why they can still claim this:
Michigan voters rejected Stein's candidacy by massive margins but her refusal to accept that state-verified result poses an expensive and risky threat to hard-working taxpayers and abuses the intent of Michigan law," Schuette said.
I mean, isn't the candidate who won Michigan handily according to the exit polls ALSO fighting?
When did the residents of Flint, Detroit, and Lansing whose voices will not be heard when the electoral college meets cease to matter?
FIGHT
lpbk2713
(42,751 posts)12. Denying the right to seek the truth.
This is a denial of basic human rights.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)14. Stein never had a leg to stand on.
Michigan law will only allow a recount if the filing party was personally aggrieved by the election result, and Stein never stood a snowball's chance in hell of winning Michigan. Since she can't file a recount on the behalf of Hillary Clinton, her demand is going nowhere fast.
spanone
(135,816 posts)15. we'll see. the courts will rule.