General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSurprise, Surprise, Surprise! Andrea Greenspan is downplaying the Bloomberg poll.
.... over samples non-whites (funny, can't recall her looking at internals on other polls and stating they over sample republicans)
... then puts up a stat showing Obama upside down on handling the economy, states Mitt is too, but doesn't put up the numbers, and never puts up a chart showing what the President up by 13 in the poll.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Comcast(Anshutz),Bain Capital,and GE are just following what Frank Lutz and Rove tell them. Their scared I tell you,their Scared. Love it!!!
Andrea Greenspan,oops,isn't her hubby a Willard adviser? No Surprise!!
RDANGELO
(3,433 posts)In 2008, whites totaled 71 percent of the vote. In this poll they total 67. So you are talking maybe 3 percent. That would still be a ten percent margin for Obama. That still doesn't count for the fact that the non white population is growing.
What the poll does is call into question some of the others that show a tight race. Polls with internals showing over sampling of Republicans.
They even had to admit that the pollster has a good track record (must run around the same social circles as Andrea) but that the poll seems to be an outlier.
I am actually O.K. with that discussion as long as they are consistent in questioning the internals.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)I think whites were 74%.
Doesn't change things much and I am not disagreeing with your general comment. (Still works out to only a 3 point swing)
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)doomed.
I changed the station right after she said it.
JitterbugPerfume
(18,183 posts)because I cant stand that hesitant little girl voice,and besides she is MRS GREENSPAN, with all that that implies.
Ayn Rand worshipper
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)moronic, stupid Ayn Rand obsession which all of us, and the rest of the world, have paid a heavy price for.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)in hating her precious little girl act. Glad to know I'm not alone. She reminds me of an ageing, blond Betty Boop.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)sometimes I will sit through Tweety's 6 pm segment but Love Big Ed and Rachel and Lawerence
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)She's been on an Obama search and destroy mission for the last several months. I'd love to see Joy Ann Reid get her spot. Reid is terrific.
JitterbugPerfume
(18,183 posts)the only ones I watch faithfully on MSNBC are Rachel and Lawrence O'Donnel. also have a soft spot in my heart for Reverend Al
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)I'm watching Thom Hartmann right now and he's taking Darrel Issa apart like a cheap suit, explaining how "fast and furious" has become a code word for a Fox News wingnut conspiracy about Obama trying to take away the guns of white people. He's giving the full back story of this insanity. It's 'must see' TV.
JitterbugPerfume
(18,183 posts)if I am not home I tape him.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)because it gets viewers to tune in to see who's winning and losing at the moment.
It's all about the horse race and keeping the excitement going.
Imagine if it were a REAL horse race where the announcer is shouting out "Their neck and neck coming out of the clubhouse turn, it's gonna be close! It's Wallaway with Applebutter coming up fast! Wallaway! Applebutter! and at the finish it's,...Wallaway!,....(then in a low barely audible voice).....by fifty lengths."
malaise
(268,885 posts)Any poll showing Rmoney close to Obama is absolute bullshit
Remember Andrea's husband thought trickle down worked
Iheartliberty
(1 post)This was the same Bloomberg polling org that showed the Wisconsin race a dead heat and Walker wiped the floor with the opposition.
The only poll result that matter is on November 6th.
malaise
(268,885 posts)Enjoy your stay. One day the truth of Wisconsin will out
Avalux
(35,015 posts)And your first post!