Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 05:20 PM Dec 2016

Merkel supports partial ban on burkas and niqabs in Germany

German Chancellor Angela Merkel threw support behind a partial ban on burkas and niqabs in Germany on Tuesday, drawing applause from the audience.

“The full-face veil is not acceptable in our country,” she told crowds at a conference of her Christian Democratic Union party in Essen, Germany. “It should be banned, wherever it is legally possible. Our law takes precedence over codes of honor, tribal or family rules, and over sharia law – that has to be spelled out clearly. This also means that it is important to show face when people communicate.”

On Tuesday, Merkel won reelection as chairwoman of the CDU party, a position she has held since 2000. She is gearing up to run for a fourth term as chancellor in 2017

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/angela-merkel-burka-niqab-ban_us_5846dcf0e4b08487410ffc9e

--------------------

So can I walk into a bank with full face and body covered, no.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Merkel supports partial ban on burkas and niqabs in Germany (Original Post) pbmus Dec 2016 OP
Campaign mode has begun malaise Dec 2016 #1
Good, the erasing of women as persons needs to be stopped. Coventina Dec 2016 #2
Good Calculating Dec 2016 #3
Good eom eissa Dec 2016 #4
She fucked up and she knows it LittleBlue Dec 2016 #5
So your answer is to build more walls ?? pbmus Dec 2016 #9
That's a straw man. The walls will go up regardless LittleBlue Dec 2016 #18
They are exactly nations of immigrants..they have not only tolerated pbmus Dec 2016 #19
That's just jargon and terminology LittleBlue Dec 2016 #21
Facts are difficult for some...apparently for you. pbmus Dec 2016 #22
They interfere with facial recognition and tracking systems jberryhill Dec 2016 #6
Coersion is coersion loyalsister Dec 2016 #7
I'm curious - how far can one take that? Should any person - male or female be jonno99 Dec 2016 #10
So you think that it is ok for you to walk into a bank pbmus Dec 2016 #11
Do you really think that's what I was referring to? loyalsister Dec 2016 #15
I am not sure that most women who wear a burka or niqabs pbmus Dec 2016 #16
How exactly does that justify coersion to not wear them? loyalsister Dec 2016 #17
Frankly, I don't give a shit what you wear.. pbmus Dec 2016 #20
good, lets hope this becomes universal in the West Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #8
she's catering to Islamophobes because they are polling well samir.g Dec 2016 #12
A lame rationale to cover a political capitulation. rug Dec 2016 #13
are all those men who have to wear them complaining too? nt msongs Dec 2016 #14

Calculating

(2,955 posts)
3. Good
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 05:30 PM
Dec 2016

Such things are constructs of a patriarchal religion which seeks to oppress women and force them to hide their 'inherently sinful' beauty.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
5. She fucked up and she knows it
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 05:33 PM
Dec 2016

Now she's trying to repair the damage so that her country isn't taken over by the far-right.

Many said it last year: immigration would turn Europe from left/center to right/far-right. Already Hollande and the French left are toast, and are being replaced by either Fillon or Le Pen (both right and pro-Russian). Renzi resigned in Italy and will probably be replaced by a populist, anti-Eurozone party led by Grillo (a comedian). A far-right, anti-immigrant party leads in polls in the Netherlands, and an EU referendum is probably inevitable at this point. Britain already has a right-wing party in the Tories.

The European left/centrists staked their reputations on the immigration issue and now they're going down with the ship. Populists from all over the spectrum are taking over as the moderate left struggles to find a message. It will be seen if merely banning head coverings will pacify populaces who are fed up with immigration from third world countries.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
18. That's a straw man. The walls will go up regardless
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 08:31 PM
Dec 2016

Europe =/= United States. Their countries are not nations of immigrants. They have populations with origins that go back to the Roman Empire, they will absolutely not tolerate large scale immigration.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
19. They are exactly nations of immigrants..they have not only tolerated
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 09:51 PM
Dec 2016

But are now the most welcome countries in the world for an immigrant ..

I suspect you have been reading too much alt right bullshit...

Ethnic groups in Europe

The ethnic groups in Europe are the focus of European ethnology, the field of anthropology related to the various ethnic groups that reside in the nations of Europe. According to German monograph Minderheitenrechte in Europa co-edited by Pan and Pfeil (2002) there are 87 distinct peoples of Europe, of which 33 form the majority population in at least one sovereign state, while the remaining 54 constitute ethnic minorities. The total number of national minority populations in Europe is estimated at 105 million people, or 14% of 770 million Europeans.[1]

There is no precise or universally accepted definition of the terms "ethnic group" or "nationality". In the context of European ethnography in particular, the terms ethnic group, people (without nation state), nationality, national minority, ethnic minority, linguistic community, linguistic group, linguistic minority and genetic haplogroup are used as mostly synonymous, although preference may vary in usage with respect to the situation specific to the individual countries of Europe.[2]

http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/08/02/number-of-refugees-to-europe-surges-to-record-1-3-million-in-2015/

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
21. That's just jargon and terminology
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 05:15 AM
Dec 2016

Europeans don't see themselves as some fluid social classification defined by academics trapped in academia. No amount of articles written by Pew will change their minds.

Merkel can bow to the popular will or be removed and replaced by AfD, which will be quite extreme. Europe's centre-left/right needs to decide whether it wants to exist going forward, or turn their countries over to the far right. Austria came within 3% of electing a president from a party formed by former Nazis.

In Europe, the immigration flood will end one way or another. The only question is who will end it first, and whether the solution will be humane by mainstream parties or inhumane by AfD (Frauke Petry, their leader, has joked about shooting refugees on sight).

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
22. Facts are difficult for some...apparently for you.
Wed Dec 7, 2016, 01:54 PM
Dec 2016

You seem to like the exclusionary populist theme...I am not sure that DU is really the place for you...maybe brietbarts anti immigrant racist website ... That shooting refugees on sight comment fits right in at brietbarts ..

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
6. They interfere with facial recognition and tracking systems
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 05:33 PM
Dec 2016

Given the use of cameras by law enforcement, which has been enhanced by automated facial recognition systems, people should not be allowed to cover their face in public.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
7. Coersion is coersion
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 05:35 PM
Dec 2016

Whether it is ripping a woman's close off, foring them to wear particular garmets, or forcing them not to wear clothes they choose.

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
10. I'm curious - how far can one take that? Should any person - male or female be
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 05:50 PM
Dec 2016

allowed to wear a veil when having their ID photo taken?

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
15. Do you really think that's what I was referring to?
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 07:20 PM
Dec 2016

I'm talking about creating a law forcing women not to wear the clothing they choose everywhere they go. We are talking about a targeted policy rather than one that applies to everyone. No hats or sunglasses applied to everyone that allows people to put them back on after they leave the bank is good enough.
It is the same Islamophibia USAers have grown to love.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
17. How exactly does that justify coersion to not wear them?
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 08:16 PM
Dec 2016

It is a violation of her autonomy a woman by FORCING her to wear something different? As I said coersion is coersion. One form does not cancel out the other- it just replaces it.

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
20. Frankly, I don't give a shit what you wear..
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 10:15 PM
Dec 2016

It only concerns me when I cannot see someones face while they are robbing or murdering someone.!

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
13. A lame rationale to cover a political capitulation.
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 07:17 PM
Dec 2016

"This also means that it is important to show face when people communicate.”

No more texts. Skype only. Or else.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Merkel supports partial b...