General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKeith Ellisons star falling as Clinton, Obama allies seek DNC alternative
Keith Ellisons star falling as Clinton, Obama allies seek DNC alternativeBy ASSOCIATED PRESS December 8, 2016 at 6:29 pm
WASHINGTON Aides and supporters of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are searching for an alternative to Rep. Keith Ellison, the early favorite to become the next leader of the Democratic National Committee, amid resistance to the Minnesota liberals bid from key parts of the partys base.
The contest to replace Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is evolving into a larger fight over the future of the party. Backers of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders are throwing their support behind Ellison while some Clinton supporters are searching for an alternative.
Ellison picked up an powerful endorsement Thursday from the AFL-CIO, which issued a statement calling him a proven leader.
But his candidacy remains under siege. Ellison has faced vocal criticism from prominent Democrats, Jewish groups and some union leaders, who have questioned his comments about Israel, his defense of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and his commitment to his own party.
http://www.twincities.com/2016/12/08/keith-ellisons-star-falling-as-clinton-obama-allies-seek-dnc-alternative/
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)TwilightZone
(25,704 posts)Things I learned on DU this week.
I like Ellison. I think he'd be a good pick. But it's a little disingenuous for some to claim he wouldn't be a controversial pick or that some of his statements couldn't use a little clarification.
I'd probably prefer Perez, but a potential MD governorship might look a little too tempting.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)And just now I learned that people often pretend two wholly different bags, holding completely different contents, are identical if it suits their narrative.
(psss.... everyone on the planet has baggage)
TwilightZone
(25,704 posts)Pointing out the hypocrisy, not doing a comparative analysis of the size of their bags.
What's Tom Perez's baggage? How does it compare to Ellison's?
WhiteTara
(29,789 posts)still_one
(92,783 posts)the DNC chair should be a full time job. As I understand it Keith says he will step down from his seat in the House if he is DNC chair, so that works for me.
The second one was whether the distraction, justified or not will interfere to do the job as the DNC effectively. I simply don't know
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)He made them when he was in college, ffs.
And in regards to his more recent "anti-Israel" smearjob:
http://jstreet.org/press-releases/continuing-attacks-congressman-ellison-seek-silence-legitimate-positions-israel/
We have major democratic party players who rely on big money donors and they are scared Ellison will push them away with progressive populist positions. That's what it comes down to.
No one in the country who is not a political junkie cares who the head of the DNC is.
Demsrule86
(69,115 posts)And some of the statements were made in 2010.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)We could make Jesus Christ the DNC chair and Faux News would be on every night calling him a commie hippy.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,151 posts)Demsrule86
(69,115 posts)it must be considered. We want a chair who can gain votes not lose core groups.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)That's the criticism I was referring to. I feel like we should discuss pros and cons, but "what the GOP will say" shouldn't even be mentioned, in my experience.
Not even boy is it irrelevant (since they'll just rant about his emails or whatever lies they want), but we need to take a page from the GOP playbook. If we DO have something the general public might consider a negative, either ignore it completely or pretend it's the most positive thing in the world.
Demsrule86
(69,115 posts)And we have a tough fight ahead...no point in having a DNC chair who becomes the story instead of telling the story of why our candidates are better than any GOP type.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)They are a lost cause. They've been a lost cause since Gore vs. Bush.
Demsrule86
(69,115 posts)No matter what I want a DNC person who is not controversial and can concentrate on electing Democrats. I do not want an ideologue either. I want someone who can field candidates in all states...we need a 50 state solution. And we need to work on state elections...I just don't think those from the house really understand or care about state elections.
flamingdem
(39,380 posts)![](/emoticons/thumbsup.gif)
brooklynite
(95,678 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)ask the afl-cio why they endorsed him, you know, those working class types?
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/keith-ellison-afl-cio-endorsement-232367
""Representative Ellison meets the high standard working people expect from leaders of our political parties, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said in a statement. He is a proven leader who will focus on year-round grassroots organizing to deliver for working families across America. Under his leadership, the Democratic Party will embody the values that our members stand for every day."
Then again, who gives a damn about unions, right (sarcasm)
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)Some unions are furious at AFL-CIO.
www.politico.com/2016/12/firefighters-union-afl-cio-dnc-chair-232070
Basically the ballot was 1) endorse Ellison, 2) abstain, or 3) "make no endorsement at this time." No other Democrat was included.
brooklynite
(95,678 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)As in, they "progress" from one flip-flop to the next.
Cha
(299,464 posts)![](/emoticons/candle.gif)
![](/emoticons/hi.gif)
gulliver
(13,253 posts)I hit YouTube and looked for things he has written (apart from paying for his book). I haven't found anything impressive yet.
Gothmog
(147,623 posts)sfwriter
(3,032 posts)There are ,ore compelling arguments against him.
Gothmog
(147,623 posts)WhiteTara
(29,789 posts)have not made it to their desired positions, Keith probably won't either. I find that telling.
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #19)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #29)
Post removed
Gothmog
(147,623 posts)No bernie support should be DNC chair
okasha
(11,573 posts)The only thing I don't like about Perez as DNC chair is that it might impede a run for elected office.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)I don't remember where, but one person was actually suggesting Rahm Emmanuel for the job...
We need a real progressive. No more quislings.
Response to workinclasszero (Original post)
Post removed
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)TwilightZone
(25,704 posts)This "sides" bullshit is partly to blame for why we lost.
Besides, Russ Feingold and Zephyr Teachout lost. They're on "your" side. Care to explain?
I think he's a good candidate and would be excellent in the position, though I'd probably prefer Perez. That doesn't mean that I think the concerns about him aren't legitimate. They shouldn't be discounted just because Bernie said so.
Cha
(299,464 posts)Zephyr and Russ lost?
sfwriter
(3,032 posts)I don't think Bernie should dictate any more than Hillary, but I feel your pain in contemplating ANY choice made by the team that lost an election to Donald Trump, even if they did get the most votes. This will be a contest, and Ellison has a lot of negatives, we'll see.
Response to workinclasszero (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Probably some corporate Dem retread who will not do their job like the last one, who managed to lose some 900 seats in state legislatures, many governorships and Congress.
Yet another step on the way to irrelevancy for the Democratic Party.
Cha
(299,464 posts)even if there were those who voted just to stop trump. I think she would have won without the asshole comey, voter suppression in red Governed states, voter purge, the Russians HACKING, the M$M negative manufactured crap on her and giving blowhard Billion$$$$$$ in free air time to make him seem "normal"
Hillary won the Primary by 3.75 Million.. She was the Winner.. it was her message that resonated.
I know it did with me. Thank you, working
katmondoo
(6,459 posts)I thought his answers sounded too canned. Sort of like a rehearsed response to a reporters questions.
She's not the person headed to the whitehouse... It's like even though the batter got the most home runs, the Game That was being played was basketball
Cha
(299,464 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....for obvious reasons.
He may be too extreme for some Democrats, and he definitely would be attacked by many republicans.
WhiteTara
(29,789 posts)He would not have the effect that we are hoping for in 2018.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)votes.
question everything
(47,872 posts)Just as some said, still saying, that Hillary was not the best candidate. And I ask then who? No, not Sanders.
Our problem is the "down ticket" young politicians like, yes, Ellison, who are capable and willing.
My problem is not with Ellison but with the ones who first suggested him as: Muslim, black.
I'd hope that if there is one lesson we should have from these elections was enough with identity politics. Go back to Obama's keynote address in 2004: there is no black America, no white America only America.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)You can't spell crap without AP.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Another example: Malcolm X. Shall we demonize him, too?
dembotoz
(16,915 posts)and a hrc crony will just make it worse
Response to workinclasszero (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JustinL
(722 posts)He just endorsed Ellison today. So did Luis Gutierrez, who said:
retread
(3,776 posts)LAS14
(13,876 posts)LAS14
(13,876 posts)Historic NY
(37,502 posts)his Deputy can be Dean....
tritsofme
(17,632 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)How long before they promote the idea of rounding up all the Muslims & putting them in camps? Will DUrs jump on that bandwagon too?
MurrayDelph
(5,337 posts)for Alison Lundergan Grimes, who was their hand-picked opponent to run against Mitch McConnell, but wouldn't admit to having voted for President Obama.
That turned out well for us, didn't it?