Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

boston bean

(36,221 posts) Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:20 AM Dec 2016

Flynn, Friendly with the Ruskies too

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Flynn, Friendly with the Ruskies too (Original Post) boston bean Dec 2016 OP

What about Tillerson, the Con's SoS possible pick KewlKat Dec 2016 #1

and he had forbidden private internet at the Pentagon DURHAM D Dec 2016 #2

This shit is surreal... The depth of this conspiracy is almost unfathomable. boston bean Dec 2016 #3

Has to be in order to steamroll 2naSalit Dec 2016 #4

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)

1. What about Tillerson, the Con's SoS possible pick

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:22 AM

Dec 2016

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)

2. and he had forbidden private internet at the Pentagon

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:23 AM

Dec 2016

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512650967

Guess that is why he was forced out early but he should be in jail.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)

3. This shit is surreal... The depth of this conspiracy is almost unfathomable.

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:24 AM

Dec 2016

I suppose it was meant to be that way.

2naSalit

(86,537 posts)

4. Has to be in order to steamroll

Reply to boston bean (Reply #3)

Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:44 AM

Dec 2016

this many. Regardless of whether clear evidence is revealed, there are so many stupid people that it will be hard to convince them of the truth since they've been spoon-fed lies for decades that they inhaled with glee so long as they didn't have to go looking for the truth themselves.

Reply to this discussion