General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe German Press unloads on ours
My wife told me I messed a great program yesterday, where the German press blasted the American press for doing not only a lousy job of reporting during the General Election season, but actually what seemed like deliberately letting the Republicans lead them around like they were obedient dogs on a leash.
She was in the States for a while earlier this year, and saw it for herself, but never thought they'd be SO complicit in favoring one party over the either during the general election. The German program said the American press neglected facts, repeated innuendo without verification, and generally ignored substance in favor of sensation, whether backed up by facts or not--in short, they all became either greater or lesser versions of Fox "News."
Not that the current American parody that passes for journalism will care, but outside of the USA, they are fooling nobody, and the Germans definitely have them pegged.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)DFW
(54,378 posts)They know what it means to have their press manipulated for propaganda purposes. They experienced it first hand.
Just the truth
DFW
(54,378 posts)How did we ever reach this point?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)It seemed pretty obvious to me that any standard that allowed a Bush presidency would allow other morons the same.
Including stolen elections.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Fairness Doctrine and Deregulating the telecommunications industry = Goebellsvision!
Perseus
(4,341 posts)the case is that too many people in the USA have become to accept lies as a way of life, and no one questions any of the lies politicians continuously throw to the media, everyone seems to be afraid to call a lie a lie, and to question the TV, or the Internet. They want to call them "untruths", "misspoke", "does not match the facts", etc...why not just say "that person is lying", and then explain, with details why the person is lying. Nothing wrong to tell someone in their face "you are lying and I am going to prove it", of course that you have to be able to prove it, but with Trump and many republicans that is very easy.
I think citizens are as guilty as the media, if people stopped watching so much trash on TV that would force the producers to change the themes of their programs. How many comedy shows out there repeat the same jokes over and over, and people react like they have heard the joke for the first time. How many shows glorify bad manners, and luck of ethics? I have seen two movies with Jenniffer Aniston where she plays the role of a cheater, on one she is getting ready to marry this guy, she then has an affair with an older guy who had had sex with her grandmother and everyone in her class, the boyfriend finds her at a party kissing the older guy, and at the end forgives her, and as a joke he makes her promise "no more of this guy"...are you kidding me? How many kid movies use burping as a joke? Just start counting and you will be surprised, even cartoons use burp as something funny.
So, stop supporting the media, stop supporting these kind of movies and the producers will change their shows, the "news" outlets will start demanding the truth from the people they interview, and stop blaming other people. Bad people will try to get away with whatever they can, and if you let them they will, but if you don't they won't.
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)which seem to promote being ignorant. Honey Boo Boo for God's sake. All those wives of wherever. There was one short-lived one in the hills of southern Indiana very near where I used to live. It was full of "isn't ignorance funny" stuff.
What first brought Donald Trump to our attention many years ago? Marla Maples affair with him while married to Ivana. And so it goes.
Media seems to show us what people want to see. That scares me more than anything... people actually enjoy watching this trash.
get the red out
(13,466 posts)I've been known to watch some pretty bad TV for entertainment, but I can't watch the mainstream news, with all their sensationalism and chasing the shiny object, while investigating nothing. Most of TV entertainment has been fairly stupid forever, lots of sit-coms, soap operas...The news media now chooses to push shit as news though, they are probably saving money on actual reporting by doing so, and yes, a lot of people don't even know how they are being manipulated by this.
DK504
(3,847 posts)about monopolies any longer we have 6 companies owning all media outlets. Until we come back to an FDR style country we are finished.
I do place this at the feet of the media, they also have become infotainment and nothing more. Even PBS is tainted by the Bush admin.
We will have to turn everything off to make them hurt financially. Do you think even 10% of Americans would even attempt this?
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)that advertise on those shows? Write letters praising people like Joy Reid, who does a good job of filtering out the BS, while writing letters condemning the ones who don't. Let them know. Not watching may help us but does it change anything? I don't know.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Missn-Hitch
(1,383 posts)The orange menace said, on television, that he "could go out on 5th avenue, shoot someone in the head and not lose any votes".
What "proof" are you going to provide?
2+2 = 5, don't ya know?
bdamomma
(63,849 posts)correct, they (M$M) is just feeding the people with crap, and it's rotting out their minds. Also no one reads anymore, look at Trump tweeting what crap is that. But leave him, better leave him with that then to give him the "codes" I hope he never gets them.
You can see we are going by the Soviet hand book and Putin is in his glory. Dumb down the citizenry and they will fall into place.
We can beat this it will get ugly but we can beat them.
cab67
(2,993 posts)Many things are presented as legitimate "debates," even though from a scientific perspective, they're not - evolution (it's real), anthropogenic global warming (it's happening), vaccines (they don't cause autism), etc. Because the media are compelled to present "both sides," they make a group of crackpots look like a legitimate "side."
That Republicans use this to their advantage goes without saying.
Mr. Evil
(2,844 posts)Focksnooze should be known as The Joseph Goebbels Memorial Network.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)DFW
(54,378 posts)I'm glad I don't have to rely on it over here.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I have just been shocked into silence by this travesty.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)Well, just remember what the head of CBS, Les Moonves, said..."Trump ain't good for the country, but he sure is good for ratings!" Hate what our media did to us!!
barbtries
(28,793 posts)i'm glad the rest of the world sees through the joke our country has become. the presidency is a reality tv show. it's all bullshit, but the consequences will be real, and dire.
Missn-Hitch
(1,383 posts)That is what MUST happen.
progressoid
(49,990 posts)salster
(15 posts)Never mind our media, what did voters learn from this? Protest vote? Write-in candidates? If Gore had won, no Iraq war. Think of all those lives saved, all those dollars saved. This election, everyone saw this train wreck headed our way and yet, here we are and everyone is looking for someone to blame. The Russians, the media, ...It was everyone who voted for Trump, everyone who didn't vote, and all those who voted for someone other than HRC that helped to get us here. WTF did everyone think was going to happen if you wrote in Bernie Sanders or voted for Jill Stein? Broken record, perhaps, but the simple truth. Florida, all over again.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)same with the press and friends of mine in Finland, Norway. Netherlands, UK, Georgia, Spain, Portugal, just to cover Europe...
DFW
(54,378 posts)The German press should not be some isolated island of sanity in Europe, but rather one group out of many who saw what our so-called "free" press was doing and was appalled as we were..
Paladin
(28,257 posts)A responsible mainstream media failed to show up for the campaign process, this time around. They gave Trump a hands-off walk, because his excesses were easy to report on, and the media, in their infinite wisdom, never figured he had a chance at winning. Fuck them all.
Missn-Hitch
(1,383 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)And I used to be a news junkie.
I can't stand how complicit they were in this debacle.
And I can't tolerate that orange face.
spooky3
(34,452 posts)And I record Samantha Bee, now playing the role established by Jon Stewart of being a better informed truth teller than the news media. She has been incredible from the beginning.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)What I've seen, I like.
Wounded Bear
(58,654 posts)10 am Eastern, I guess.
Called AM Joy on MSNBC
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)maxrandb
(15,330 posts)The only way the MSM will get the message is if they start losing viewers and money. Sorry, but that's it! They don't give a fuck that we have Russia influencing our elections. They don't give a flying fuck about science or climate change.
They throw out Reid, Maddow and O'Donnel, in the hopes that we will forget the fact that
- For every one Reid, there are a dozen Chucky Todds
- For every one Maddow, there are a dozen Bill Halperins
- For every one O'Donnel, there are a dozen Andrea "Crypt Keeper" Mitchels
The only way to fix this shit is to hurt them in their wallet. I mean, I guess the protesters could get smart and realize it's not that far from Trump Tower to Rockefeller Plaza and storm the MSNBC Studio, but short of that...it's all "bread and circuses"
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the next year's installments.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)BBC World News, France 24, DW, Euronews, NHK World, CCTV, RT, NDTV, Al Jazeera... and each of them will have coverage of major US events and a different slant. Which one is most impartial? Which one is closer to the truth? Many of this is on cable/satellite subscriptions, those that are missing can be easily got online. Being who I am, I prefer my news in English without commercials and with a healthy dose of impartiality. Even if it is uncomfortable.
madokie
(51,076 posts)spooky3
(34,452 posts)Is that Fox's demographics skew older, over 65. In no other realm of TV do you see networks competing for this demographic, which tends to buy less stuff that advertisers are pushing. And certainly it was not necessary (and definitely was not ethical) to attract viewers to be so anti Clinton. So I have a very hard time accepting that only attracting viewers is driving this.
I think that the owners' and top managers' own political views lean right and that factor influenced their actions as much as the economics did.
DFW
(54,378 posts)That filtered directly down to the editorial level, and from there to those who appeared on screen.
We weren't seeing a story. We were watching a script.
crosinski
(411 posts)Just as the right wing took over most am radio, now we're seeing people with VASTS amounts of money take over TV news too. The right wing bias was just so damned blatant this year that we stopped watching at our house. We get our news from online/print journalists, and here at DU, now.
I feel unexpectedly sad writing this. A part of American Culture is dead.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)..they don't even have commercials. When the greedy geriatrics in the States see a break in the propagantanistas, they go to boner medicine, disease pharmacy advertisers...play directly to their viewing audience. And I should say, as we saw at the dRumpf rallies, there are plenty of brain dead, butt-ignorant, shit scared haters of ALL ages who are played to by the advertizers on fox.
But outside the country, at commercial times, it goes to some bull shit called "fox extra", and they have hillbillies singing in front of the fox studeos, or health tips, or some other interesting tidbits that keep their audience glued to the tube until the get back with more distorted information to stuff in to our empty heads.
It's a masterful scheme to " not lose the lazy ass audience", and IT WORKS! So we get ZERO commercials down here in Mexico, and the fox lemmings LOVE IT! I even had one total stranger in a US airport share with me how much she loves watching fox down here in Mexico, because she learns so much (bull shit) from the "fox extra" tricks.
Fox is NOT stupid. They saceifice advertising revenue outside the country to keep their viewers "glued".
There is NO MSNBC here. Only fox and CNN, and there is often little difference between the two. We have LOST the media war....long ago. Take a drive across AmeriKKA sometime and listen to talk radio. If you can survive that without becoming a right wing fruit cake, you are a stronger person than me.
Martin Eden
(12,867 posts)Notwithstanding his condemnation of the media as being unfair to him.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)shit. They never pulled it all together to recap it all, just reacted to each event and then forgot about it. Trump counted on this - since he knows how to manipulate the media and he knows, his base, the low-information people would never research and follow-up on the truth.
Trump is continuing this pattern today - bombardment of incremental idiocy.
It is up to the press to learn from their mistakes during the election and pull this all together and recap it all.
Start with the crazy hypocrisy of him calling foreign leaders on an unsecure cell phone and considering Petraeus for SOS....both demonstrate the topic he continually bashed Hillary for as a danger to the world.
Add in the idiocy of appointing Rick Perry to the department he can't remember he wanted to get rid of. Appointing a woman who knows zero about foreign policy to the UN.
And many more
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)all the way around.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)Germany as an exemplary European democracy with competent and focused leadership now laments an emerging Fascist state and the enabling media that willingly abetted it.
niyad
(113,302 posts)about the election.
pity that people in this country are so damned stupid.
DFW
(54,378 posts)They find the gullibility of the American voter to be so great as to defy all belief.
niyad
(113,302 posts)mopinko
(70,103 posts)what is going to happen?
we worried for our standing under w, but jeebus. this is whole nuther ball of wax.
suppose they just refuse to deal w him? i know i f'ing would. i'd call em up and ask him if he has hillary's cell if i had a problem.
i'd sooner talk to mitch mc connell.
if they get away w this, democracy dies not just here, but in the modern world. hopefully to be resurrected one day as we did athens'.
the whole world is watching.
what are we going to do?
niyad
(113,302 posts)bdamomma
(63,849 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)bdamomma
(63,849 posts)the MSM is doing this filthy man's binding. All for money and greed, hit them in the pocketbook and stop your cable subscriptions and get your news somewhere else. Give donations to Free speech TV and Democracy Now, Media Matters.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world
here is another article it is starting already there are people out who disagree.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world
Silent3
(15,211 posts)Preferably a story written in English? That would be much appreciated if such an article about the program you mention exists.
DFW
(54,378 posts)The German electronic media, unlike their print media, does not often provide English (or any other) translations for its programs, even when they do archive them. Yesterday, I had to work down in Bavaria, and so did not hear the story. It was on the ZDF, which is one of the two national TV stations, on Monday morning.
Here is the original: https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/heute-journal
*My wife also noted that our two daughters, one living in New York, one in Frankfurt, don't even read newspapers. They get everything they know from the internet. Case in point--I got the same fake post about the childhood of Thomas Edison from my dentist in Dallas and a Hillary Hater in the north. They both believed it lock, stock and barrel, although a quick look in Snopes would have disproved it in ten seconds.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)It's horrible here.
KatyBR
(183 posts)Trump has promised to remove net neutrality and put Jeff Eisenbach (well known Verizon federal lobbyist) in control of the FCC transition team. JE has for years ranted against Net Neutrality for the industry. With those FCC protections removed, the big telcos and cable cos are going to have enormous economic and political power to control what we see, learn, buy (no one puts up with buffering these days). They'll throttle our usage to only the websites they support (commercial & political); they'll data cap even more.
https://www.benton.org/headlines/trump-fcc-adviser-says-net-neutrality-target-next-administration
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)And it's automatically a given in that world that Republicans are good for business.
Michael Moore was right in his book "Stupid White Men".
C Moon
(12,213 posts)Maybe DU will still be here, but it will load a slug's pace.
moondust
(19,981 posts)showed a hard-hitting documentary last month on Putin and the Litvinenko polonium poisoning, bringing up Putin's background with organized crime in St. Petersburg. I'm not sure U.S. media would even show something like that, much less produce it. Recommended viewing if available.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)That's our press in a nutshell.
tblue37
(65,342 posts)War Horse
(931 posts)We on this side of the pond do *not* want the U.S. to fail. Quite the contracy, where would we be without you?
DFW
(54,378 posts)All Germans know whose ideals replaced those of the Nazis, and press freedom (with the exception of forbidding Nazi propaganda) was an American concept they embraced here as one of the greatest gifts we ever gave them. They looked up to us and our press with nothing but glowing admiration.
They are confused and dismayed that their former role model is regressing into a sort of hybrid Soviet mode, where they all conform to varying degrees of self-repression, denial, and refusal to confront the bad guys for fear of getting on their bad side. They used to admire our press because they saw it as WILLING to get on the bad guys' bad side (think Woodward and Bernstein, 1972-74), and can't figure out why our "free" press would slink off into cowardice without even being threatened by a repressive political police.
War Horse
(931 posts)raging moderate
(4,305 posts)We are in such danger.
DFW
(54,378 posts)Frequently and in quantity. They must be made to understand that a return to the old ideals is not the wish of a lone crackpot but the wish of their viewers. Walter Cronkite was not an example of what should be rejected, but rather of what should be emulated. Remain silent, and they'll think they're doing everything right.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)He's been doing this false equivalency BS since the Raygun administration.
DFW
(54,378 posts)Not even during the Watergate investigation. What he discovered during Watergate, and the results of his reporting with Bernstein, must have disturbed him greatly. He certainly seems to have been trying to make amends with the Republican party ever since, but it is still undeniable that he, along with Bernstein, showed courage and daring in helping bring Nixon down. Even if he adopted a more cowardly stance since then, his actions during the Nixon era were exemplary of what the press should have been doing all along.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)He knew better but still gave them a pass letting them get away with worse than anything Nixon has done.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)from our news media (in addition to the electoral college) is the only thing that is keeping the GOP relevant. In any other country, that toxic, good-for-nothing party would be dead by now.
DFW
(54,378 posts)Their party is nowhere without false reporting to convince them that the detrimental actions undertaken by their party are "good for them (about as good a potassium cyanide, but they don't realize that until it's too late)". Fox Noise and National Hate Radio, along with the internet echo chambers keep telling them "libbruls" are responsible for their poor educations, toxic drinking water and Oklahoma earthquakes. They believe it and vote accordingly.
When Fox "News" was created, Roger Ailes, in a rare moment of truth, responded with a question about whether they intended to report news objectively or not. His answer was "we have an agenda." Coming from the guy who proposed (then unsuccessfully) that the Nixon White House have their own news service in order to counter truthful news reports about their actions, his comment should not have been taken lightly.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)In the rank and file. I feel like I shouldn't have to go to turn to "alternative" news for basic facts.
Plus, facts don't have opposing viewpoints at all, and not all "opposing views" are valid, especially if one opinion is based on demonstrable facts and the "let's hear from the other side's" opinion is based on emotion. Not even morality or ethics or reason, but pure emotion.
Of course, it looks like forty percent of Americans are primarily getting their news from Facebook, the same place I go to look at pictures of my coworker's appetizer and read the every-ten-minute updates my aunt gives us about her constipation.
Sometimes I feel like we've become a nation largely comprised of cowards and idiots, except we're generally to cowardly to say so or to stupid to understand it.
DFW
(54,378 posts)Now people can carry their lives around with them. Pay bills, order meals, make travel arrangements, even make phone calls. We see whole cities walking around, not talking to each other, but with their noses buried in those things. That's why I refuse to get one. I am not yet interested in ceasing to interact with the world around me. I can sift through reports about appetizers in Nepal later. I have also seen people almost literally fall apart if their smart phone is damaged or lost. I get the feeling many of them would rather lose an eye or a leg if they had to make the choice. My outfit made me get one for use when I'm in the States. Fortunately, that is relatively seldom these days, and I usually only use it for something it apparently was only marginally intended for (i.e. a telephone).
Our daughters, both university graduates, are always using those things, although they both have jobs that require reading and math skills. They never read newspapers, which drives my wife nuts. As the son of a man who was a prominent Washington print journalist for fifty years and a past president of the Gridiron Club, I find it blasphemy, but not a process I am capable of reversing.
There are print newspapers with slanted agendas, too, of course, but these are easy to spot. No one reads "The Washington Times" who doesn't already know the rag is practically Fox Noise in print.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)That is owned by the right. This is the real issue facing the democratic partyand the future of democracy.