General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMan made at least $35,000 by promising to care for people’s pets after the owners were raptured
http://www.getreligion.org/2011/12/about-that-raptured-pet-owners-insurance/Tuesday, December 27, 2011
As reporters often focus on brand new information, follow-up stories sometimes get left by the wayside. Tracking down a source or checking in on the end result of something might not lead to anything worth reporting. Its nice to see NPR do some digging around on a story that was begging to be shared across the Internet.
Remember when Harold Campings prediction that the faithful would be raptured was all the rage for about a week in May? There were plenty of stories about end of the world predictions and what happened to people who believed such predictions. As we noted, NPR was one of the first to highlight the struggles families faced as the date drew nearer.
What happens, though, when media outlets report on a seemingly silly business, one that preys on peoples beliefs? Looks like Bart Centre made out with at least $35,000 by promising to care for peoples pets if the owners were raptured in the next 10 years. Of course, some people wanted a refund, which Centre declined.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)DCKit
(18,541 posts)They deserved to lose their money to a con man, and shouldn't own pets, to begin with.
My dogs are going to Heaven and, if they don't, I wanna go where they're going.
Mac1949
(389 posts)No soul, no rapture. A sad group of people, really.
Nay
(12,051 posts)theoretically was going to fulfill that promise after a 'rapture.' This business is called an "insurance business." When that rapture didn't come, the people who bought the service want their money back? After 10 years or so, do these same people call up their insurance companies and demand all their money back because their house didn't burn down? If not, why not? It's the same thing. Insurance agents know that most of the policies they sell will never be collected upon because the law of averages says that only a few of the insured houses will ever burn down -- the same goes for the possibility of rapture. In my mind, of course, NO ONE is ever going to be raptured, but I seem to be in the minority, and it is certainly not fraudulent of Mr. Centre to offer, for a price, to care for the left-behind pets of rapture believers. The rapture believers put their money where their mouth is for once, and now they think Mr. CENTRE has duped them? How has he duped them? HE didn't go around promising a rapture in May. Seems like the believers need to go after good old Harold Camping.
Another point -- according to Christian beliefs, lots of people get "left behind." If there had been a rapture and some of the people who thought they were going did not go, would they demand their money back from Mr. Centre? See insurance example above.
maggiesfarmer
(297 posts)the rapture did occur -- was he prepared to care for those animals? Conservative estimate of him getting the $135 per animal, $35k income ==> 259 animals. Did he have shelter, food, vet care, etc... for that many?
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)comipinko
(541 posts)That's funny.
quaker bill
(8,264 posts)most of the funds obtained were donated to animal shelters (after paying for the google ads and such). He offered the services of "certified, caring, atheist, animal lovers" who were clearly at no risk of being "raptured".
According to the NPR interview, he considered himself an atheist, and did not charge all that much for the "service". He stated that if he believed that the "rapture" was really going to happen, he would have needed to charge alot more.
slay
(7,670 posts)if the churches can prey on these people's stupidity TAX FREE then others can too. and they got the service they paid for. heheheh.