The other shoe drops. Huma Abedin says was NEVER SERVED the warrant
the FBI claims to have gotten -- to dive into her emails on Weiner's computer -- and neither was Weiner.
Karen Dunn, Abedin's lawyer, says the law required Abedin to be served a warrant.
So what happened?
ON EDIT: The only copy of Dunn's letter that I could see was on the public FB page of E. Randol Schoenberg, the attorney.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/15/abedin-claims-never-received-fbi-warrant-for-weiner-emails.html
Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin told a Manhattan federal judge in a court filing Thursday that neither she nor Anthony Weiner ever received FBI search warrants for emails found on her estranged husband’s computer — raising questions about whether FBI warrants for the emails were ever issued, and if so to whom.
In the letter, Abedin’s lawyer said she is unable to comment on a Los Angeles lawyer’s request for FBI warrants tied to her emails, because “the government has never provided her with a copy of the warrant it reportedly obtained to search certain emails.”
“We understand that Mr. Weiner has likewise not been provided with a copy of the material,” said the letter from lawyer Karen Dunn.
Abedin’s letter is tied to a request by E. Randol Schoenberg, a genealogist and lawyer based in LA, who has asked a Manhattan federal judge to help him get to the bottom of FBI Director Jim Comey’s late-October surprise announcement that emails tied to the agency’s probe into Clinton’s email server were found on Anthony Weiner’s computer during the FBI’s probe into his sexting with an underage teen.
http://nypost.com/2016/12/15/huma-says-she-never-received-fbi-warrants-for-email-searches/
Dunn’s letter Thursday cites law that states an officer executing the warrant “must give a copy of the warrant and a receipt or the property taken to the person from whom, or from whose premise, the property was taken.”
Dunn also requests copies of the warrant and warrant application “so Ms. Abedin may formulate her position” on Schoenberg’s request.
The FBI did not immediately return a request for comment.
Reports at the time said the Justice Department was required to obtain separate warrants because Abedin’s emails were not related to the probe into Weiner’s sexting.
Judge Castel suggested at a hearing on Tuesday that he was inclined to release any warrants tied to the investigation, but said he wanted to hear first from the parties that had been served.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Right after he appoints Andrew Napolitano to the Supreme Court.
?itok=j6agBV3N
...for the welcome 
As far as the investigation, there have been no formal charges so far, but I would be willing to bet that they are wanting to prosecute under the 'Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act' to get a heavier sentence. It is a federal crime when a computer is used, as well as the fact that the girl claims that he directed her to perform acts on herself. The DOJ claims it is a crime to; “persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct.”
